Suppr超能文献

在加利福尼亚一家三级医疗中心,头孢唑林与萘夫西林治疗甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的比较

Cefazolin versus Nafcillin for Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection in a California Tertiary Medical Center.

作者信息

Pollett S, Baxi S M, Rutherford G W, Doernberg S B, Bacchetti P, Chambers H F

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases & Biosecurity, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA Epidemiology Division, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jul 22;60(8):4684-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00243-16. Print 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Recent observational studies have suggested possible reductions in mortality in patients receiving cefazolin versus antistaphylococcal penicillins. We examined 90-day mortality in patients receiving cefazolin compared to nafcillin for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infection (BSI). We identified persons with MSSA BSI admitted to San Francisco General Hospital from January 2008 to July 2013 through a hospital-wide infection surveillance system and confirmed 90-day mortality using U.S. national vital registries. We included persons receiving cefazolin or nafcillin as the predominant intravenous antimicrobial agent; all participants received inpatient Infectious Diseases service consultation. We estimated the association between receipt of cefazolin and 90-day risk of death by multivariate logistic regression, including a propensity score for receiving cefazolin as the second predictor. Of 230 MSSA BSI cases, 30 received nafcillin and 70 received cefazolin as the predominant antimicrobial; 10 died within 90 days, 5 from each group. Unadjusted analysis showed substantial but not statistically significant reduced odds of death in those receiving cefazolin (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10 to 1.44). Multivariate analysis with propensity scores found a similar adjusted odds ratio (0.40; 95% CI, 0.09 to 1.74; P = 0.22). We found a large reduction in 90-day mortality in those receiving cefazolin compared to nafcillin for MSSA BSI, but this finding was not statistically significant. The magnitude of effect seen in this and other studies justifies further study.

摘要

近期的观察性研究表明,与抗葡萄球菌青霉素相比,接受头孢唑林治疗的患者死亡率可能会降低。我们研究了接受头孢唑林治疗的患者与接受萘夫西林治疗的甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)血流感染(BSI)患者的90天死亡率。我们通过全院感染监测系统确定了2008年1月至2013年7月入住旧金山总医院的MSSA BSI患者,并使用美国国家生命登记系统确认了90天死亡率。我们纳入了以头孢唑林或萘夫西林作为主要静脉抗菌药物的患者;所有参与者均接受了感染性疾病科的住院会诊。我们通过多因素逻辑回归估计接受头孢唑林治疗与90天死亡风险之间的关联,将接受头孢唑林的倾向评分作为第二个预测因素。在230例MSSA BSI病例中,30例接受萘夫西林作为主要抗菌药物,70例接受头孢唑林作为主要抗菌药物;10例在90天内死亡,每组各5例。未调整分析显示,接受头孢唑林治疗的患者死亡几率大幅降低,但无统计学意义(比值比,0.38;95%置信区间[CI],0.10至1.44)。倾向评分的多因素分析发现了类似的调整后比值比(0.40;95%CI,0.09至1.74;P = 0.22)。我们发现,与萘夫西林相比,接受头孢唑林治疗的MSSA BSI患者90天死亡率大幅降低,但这一发现无统计学意义。本研究及其他研究中观察到的效应大小值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Cefazolin versus Nafcillin for Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection in a California Tertiary Medical Center.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jul 22;60(8):4684-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00243-16. Print 2016 Aug.
3
Comparison of Nafcillin and Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.
Am J Med Sci. 2020 Jul;360(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
4
A comparison of safety and outcomes with cefazolin versus nafcillin for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020 Apr;53(2):321-327. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
6
Nafcillin versus cefazolin for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.
J Infect Public Health. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):727-731. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
9
Is cefazolin inferior to nafcillin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia?
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Nov;55(11):5122-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00485-11. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
10
Treatment outcomes with cefazolin versus oxacillin for deep-seated methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Sep;59(9):5232-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04677-14. Epub 2015 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

2
Contemporary Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia-Controversies in Clinical Practice.
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 30;77(11):e57-e68. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad500.
5
The Cost-effectiveness of Cefazolin Compared With Antistaphylococcal Penicillins for the Treatment of Methicillin-Sensitive Bacteremia.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 4;8(11):ofab476. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab476. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Antistaphylococcal Penicillin vs Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Spinal Epidural Abscesses.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 16;8(3):ofab071. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab071. eCollection 2021 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
4
Comparison of cefazolin versus oxacillin for treatment of complicated bacteremia caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Sep;58(9):5117-24. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02800-14. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
7
Incidence of bloodstream infection: a review of population-based studies.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Jun;19(6):492-500. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12144. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
8
Predictors of mortality in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012 Apr;25(2):362-86. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05022-11.
9
Formal infectious diseases consultation is associated with decreased mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;31(9):2421-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1585-y. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
10
Is cefazolin inferior to nafcillin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia?
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Nov;55(11):5122-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00485-11. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验