Arbel Reout, Latzer Yael, Koren Danny
ARBEL: Haifa University, Haifa, Israel; LATZER and KOREN: Haifa University and Rambam Medical Center, Haifa.
J Psychiatr Pract. 2014 Mar;20(2):85-93. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000445243.00683.30.
To investigate and validate a novel approach to distinguishing between two possible sources of poor insight in anorexia nervosa: true unawareness, in which a patient is not aware that other people think there is a problem, and disagreement, in which a patient does recognize that others think there is a problem.
Thirty-nine patients with anorexia nervosa or eating disorder not otherwise specified-anorexia nervosa were given two versions of the Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD), one in which they were asked about their own opinion and one in which they were asked about their clinicians' opinion. Clinicians also completed the SUMD with their opinion about the patient's illness. Patients and clinicians both also completed a Visual Analog Scale assessing treatment acceptance.
About 57% of the overall level of poor insight was explained by disagreement. Prediction of treatment acceptance was significantly improved when poor insight was broken down into true unawareness and disagreement.
These data suggest that impaired insight in anorexia nervosa is an additive outcome of true unawareness and disagreement.
探讨并验证一种区分神经性厌食症中两种可能导致自知力差的原因的新方法:真正的无自知力,即患者未意识到其他人认为其存在问题;以及意见分歧,即患者确实认识到其他人认为其存在问题。
对39例神经性厌食症或未另行规定的进食障碍——神经性厌食症患者进行了两个版本的精神障碍自知力量表(SUMD)测试,一个版本询问他们自己的看法,另一个版本询问他们临床医生的看法。临床医生也完成了SUMD,表明他们对患者病情的看法。患者和临床医生还均完成了一个视觉模拟量表,以评估对治疗的接受程度。
约57%的自知力差总体水平可由意见分歧来解释。当将自知力差细分为真正的无自知力和意见分歧时,对治疗接受程度的预测有显著改善。
这些数据表明,神经性厌食症患者的自知力受损是真正的无自知力和意见分歧共同作用的结果。