Tsang Julia Y S, Ni Yun-Bi, Chan Siu-Ki, Shao Mu-Min, Law Bonita K B, Tan Puay Hoon, Tse Gary M
Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;21(7):2218-28. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3629-2. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
Androgen receptor (AR), a nuclear steroid hormone receptor, is differentially expressed in breast cancer subgroups with distinct clinical implications.
To investigate the clinical significance of AR in breast cancers more precisely, the expression of AR in a large cohort of breast cancer was correlated with clinicopathological features, biomarker expression, and patients' survival according to different molecular groupings in this study.
Higher AR expression was found in ER+ (57.8 %) than in ER- (24.7 %) cancers. In the ER+ cancers, AR expression was associated with favorable clinicopathological features, including lower grade (p < .001), lower pT stage (p < .001), and positivity for PR (p < .001). It was an independent prognostic factor for longer disease-free survival, mainly in the HER2+ luminal B cancers (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.251, 95 % CI 0.065-0.972, p = .045). In ER- cancers, AR expression was associated with features distinct from basal-like breast cancer, and such features were found in molecular apocrine (MA) cancers. AR correlated with presence of extensive in situ component (p = .006) and apocrine phenotype (p < .001), HER2 (p = .026), and EGFR (p = .048), but negatively with c-kit (p = .041), CK5/6 (p < .001), CK14 (p = .002), and αB-crystallin (p = .038). However, AR expression was found only in 37.8 % of immunohistochemically defined MA. Of note, AR-MA appeared to have a trend of worse overall survival than AR+MA.
AR expression was different in ER+ and ER- cancers and had different clinical implications. AR alone may not be a good marker for MA subtype. Its expression in MA may have substantial prognostic implication and as such warrants further validation.
雄激素受体(AR)是一种核类固醇激素受体,在具有不同临床意义的乳腺癌亚组中差异表达。
为更精确地研究AR在乳腺癌中的临床意义,本研究根据不同分子分组,将一大组乳腺癌中AR的表达与临床病理特征、生物标志物表达及患者生存情况进行关联分析。
雌激素受体阳性(ER+)乳腺癌中AR的高表达率(57.8%)高于雌激素受体阴性(ER-)乳腺癌(24.7%)。在ER+乳腺癌中,AR表达与良好的临床病理特征相关,包括低分级(p <.001)、低pT分期(p <.001)和孕激素受体(PR)阳性(p <.001)。它是无病生存期延长的独立预后因素,主要见于人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性的管腔B型乳腺癌(风险比[HR]=0.251,95%可信区间0.065 - 0.972,p =.045)。在ER-乳腺癌中,AR表达与不同于基底样乳腺癌的特征相关,这些特征见于分子大汗腺癌(MA)。AR与广泛原位成分的存在(p =.006)、大汗腺表型(p <.001)、HER2(p =.026)和表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)(p =.048)相关,但与干细胞因子受体(c-kit)(p =.041)、细胞角蛋白5/6(CK5/6)(p <.001)、细胞角蛋白14(CK14)(p =.002)和αB-晶状体蛋白(p =.038)呈负相关。然而,免疫组化定义的MA中仅37.8%表达AR。值得注意的是,AR阴性的MA似乎比AR阳性的MA总体生存趋势更差。
AR在ER+和ER-乳腺癌中的表达不同,具有不同的临床意义。AR单独可能不是MA亚型的良好标志物。其在MA中的表达可能具有重要的预后意义,因此值得进一步验证。