• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国诉卡罗尼亚案:商业言论自由的力量日益增强,以及可能重新强调将药品未标示用途推广归类为“虚假和误导性”行为。

United States v. Caronia: The increasing strength of commercial free speech and potential new emphasis on classifying off-label promotion as "false and misleading".

作者信息

Scheineson Marc J, Cuevas Guillermo

出版信息

Food Drug Law J. 2013;68(2):201-16, iii.

PMID:24640469
Abstract

The authority of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to prohibit off-label promotion of drug products suffered another serious setback in United States v. Caronia. Viewing a legal system where physicians can prescribe prescription pharmaceuticals for unapproved uses legally in their practice of medicine, the Federal appeals court affirmed the commercial free speech rights of manufacturers to use truthful, non-misleading speech about lawfully marketed products. As a result of this case, and others upon which the decision is based, FDA is likely to challenge manufacturer promotion more carefully, and only if it can demonstrate that claims are not truthful, but are false or misleading, or otherwise deprive the prescriber of adequate directions for use.

摘要

在美国诉卡罗尼亚案中,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)禁止药品标签外推广的权力再次遭受严重挫折。鉴于在这样一个法律体系中,医生在行医过程中可以合法地为未经批准的用途开具处方药,联邦上诉法院确认了制造商就合法上市产品使用真实、非误导性言论的商业言论自由权。由于此案以及作为该判决依据的其他案件,FDA可能会更加谨慎地挑战制造商的推广行为,并且只有在能够证明相关声明不真实、虚假或具有误导性,或者以其他方式剥夺开处方者足够的使用说明时才会这样做。

相似文献

1
United States v. Caronia: The increasing strength of commercial free speech and potential new emphasis on classifying off-label promotion as "false and misleading".美国诉卡罗尼亚案:商业言论自由的力量日益增强,以及可能重新强调将药品未标示用途推广归类为“虚假和误导性”行为。
Food Drug Law J. 2013;68(2):201-16, iii.
2
Prospects for Enforcing Prohibitions on Off-Label Drug Promotion after United States v. Caronia: An Analysis of Litigated Cases.美国诉卡罗纳案后禁止药品标签外推广的前景:诉讼案例分析。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Jun 1;46(3):487-504. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8893571.
3
Truth, Falsity, and Fraud: Off-Label Drug Settlements and the Future of the Civil False Claims Act.真相、虚假与欺诈:药品未按标签用药和解协议与《民事虚假索赔法》的未来
Food Drug Law J. 2016;71(3):401-40.
4
The ban on "off-label" pharmaceutical promotion: constitutionally permissible prophylaxis against false or misleading commercial speech?对“药品未标示用途”促销活动的禁令:针对虚假或误导性商业言论的合宪预防性措施?
Am J Law Med. 2011;37(2-3):278-98. doi: 10.1177/009885881103700204.
5
Commercial speech and off-label drug uses: what role for wide acceptance, general recognition and research incentives?商业言论与药品未标示用途:广泛接受、普遍认可及研究激励措施能发挥何种作用?
Am J Law Med. 2011;37(2-3):258-77. doi: 10.1177/009885881103700203.
6
Snake oil salesmen or purveyors of knowledge: off-label promotions and the commercial speech doctrine.江湖郎中还是知识传播者:药品未注册用途推广与商业言论原则
Cornell J Law Public Policy. 2013 Winter;23(2):337-93.
7
United States v. Caronia: Off-Label Drug Promotion and First Amendment Balancing.美国诉卡罗尼亚案:药品未标示用途推广与第一修正案平衡
Fordham Law Rev. 2018 Apr;86(5):2595-623.
8
Pharmaceutical Industry Off-label Promotion and Self-regulation: A Document Analysis of Off-label Promotion Rulings by the United Kingdom Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority 2003-2012.制药行业的药品未按批准说明书用药推广与自我监管:对英国药品使用规范管理局2003 - 2012年未按批准说明书用药推广裁决的文件分析
PLoS Med. 2016 Jan 26;13(1):e1001945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001945. eCollection 2016 Jan.
9
Off-label marketing: free speech or illegal promotion?药品未按批准用途销售:言论自由还是非法促销?
BMJ. 2013 Jan 22;346:f320. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f320.
10
Court rules that FDA cannot restrict off-label marketing.法院裁定,美国食品药品监督管理局不能限制药品的非标签营销。
BMJ. 2015 Aug 11;351:h4367. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4367.