Suppr超能文献

1064nm 掺钕钇铝石榴石激光治疗甲真菌病无效:一项随机对照试验。

Lack of efficacy with 1064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for the treatment of onychomycosis: a randomized, controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.

Department of Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 May;70(5):911-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.12.024. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laser therapies have been Food and Drug Administration approved for temporary nail plate clearance; however, there is minimal evidence of their long-term efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the clinical and mycological clearance of toenails treated with 1064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser versus no treatment.

METHODS

This was a randomized, controlled, single-center trial comparing 2 treatments with 1064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser (fluence of 5 J/cm(2), rate of 6 Hz) spaced 2 weeks apart versus no treatment in 27 patients (N = 125 affected nails) with clinical and mycological diagnosis of onychomycosis. At 3 months, patients were assessed with mycological cultures and proximal nail plate measurements. Patients treated with laser were also assessed with proximal nail plate measurements at 12 months.

RESULTS

At 3 months, 33% of patients treated with laser achieved a negative mycological culture compared with 20% of the control group (P = .49), and had more proximal nail plate clearance compared with control subjects (0.44 vs 0.15 mm, P = .18), which was not statistically significant. At 12 months, there was no difference in nail plate clearance between laser versus control subjects (0.24 vs 0.15 mm, P = .59).

LIMITATIONS

Our study was limited by the small sample size and number of treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant mycological culture or clinical nail plate clearance with 1064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser compared with control.

摘要

背景

激光疗法已获得美国食品和药物管理局批准,可暂时清除指甲板;然而,其长期疗效的证据很少。

目的

我们旨在评估 1064nm 钕:钇铝石榴石激光治疗与未治疗相比对趾甲的临床和真菌学清除效果。

方法

这是一项随机、对照、单中心试验,比较了两种治疗方法:1064nm 钕:钇铝石榴石激光(5J/cm² 的能量密度,6Hz 的频率),间隔 2 周治疗一次,与未治疗 27 例(N=125 个受累指甲)患有临床和真菌学诊断的甲真菌病的患者。在 3 个月时,通过真菌培养和近端甲板测量评估患者。接受激光治疗的患者还在 12 个月时接受近端甲板测量评估。

结果

在 3 个月时,与对照组(20%)相比,33%接受激光治疗的患者获得了阴性真菌培养结果(P=0.49),并且与对照组相比,近端甲板清除更多(0.44 毫米对 0.15 毫米,P=0.18),但无统计学意义。在 12 个月时,激光与对照组之间的甲板清除无差异(0.24 毫米对 0.15 毫米,P=0.59)。

局限性

我们的研究受到样本量小和治疗次数少的限制。

结论

与对照组相比,1064nm 钕:钇铝石榴石激光治疗在真菌培养和临床甲板清除方面没有显著效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验