• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临终关怀:癌症护理者与其他护理者有何不同?

Caring at the end of life: do cancer caregivers differ from other caregivers?

作者信息

Girgis Afaf, Abernethy Amy P, Currow David C

机构信息

Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, USA Discipline, Palliative & Supportive Services, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Dec;5(5):513-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000495. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000495
PMID:24644201
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cancer is one of the most common health conditions in receipt of informal caregiving. This study compares key characteristics of caregivers who cared for someone with cancer until death with caregivers of people with other life-limiting illnesses and their care recipients irrespective of health service utilisation.

METHOD

Data were analysed from annual state-wide South Australian Health Omnibus Surveys (2000-2007) involving 14,624 respondents, regarding end of life care. Descriptive and comparative data are presented.

RESULTS

Almost a third of respondents (32%; participation rate 72%) had someone close to them die from an 'expected' death in the preceding 5 years. One in 10 (10%) respondents reported providing hands-on care predominantly for someone with cancer. Compared with non-cancer caregivers, cancer caregivers cared for someone who was significantly younger (mean age 66 (95% CI 64 to 67) years vs 74 (95% CI 72 to 77) years; one-way analysis of variance p<0.0001) and were more likely to report having a hospice/palliative care service involved in the care of the deceased (65% (95% CI 63 to 67) compared with 39% (95% CI 37 to 42). In the Australian context, this may mean contact with inpatient, outpatient and community-based services.There were no differences between the needs which caregivers perceived to be unmet or the perceptions that no additional supports were required between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Informal caregivers perform a critical social and economic role in care provision. Cancer caregivers are a proportionally larger cohort than non-cancer caregivers. With the increasing incidence of cancer, the sustainability of a voluntary cancer caregiving workforce will be reliant upon minimising the burden of care.

摘要

目的

癌症是接受非正式照料的最常见健康状况之一。本研究比较了照料癌症患者直至其死亡的照料者与照料其他患有危及生命疾病患者的照料者及其照料对象的关键特征,且不考虑卫生服务的利用情况。

方法

对南澳大利亚州年度综合健康调查(2000 - 2007年)中涉及14624名受访者的临终关怀数据进行分析。呈现描述性和对比性数据。

结果

近三分之一的受访者(32%;参与率72%)在过去5年中有亲近的人死于“预期”死亡。十分之一(10%)的受访者报告主要为癌症患者提供实际照料。与非癌症照料者相比,癌症照料者照料的对象明显更年轻(平均年龄66岁(95%置信区间64至67岁)对74岁(95%置信区间72至77岁);单因素方差分析p<0.0001),且更有可能报告在照料死者过程中有临终关怀/姑息治疗服务参与(65%(95%置信区间63至67),相比之下为39%(95%置信区间37至42))。在澳大利亚的背景下,这可能意味着与住院、门诊和社区服务有接触。两组之间在照料者认为未得到满足的需求或认为不需要额外支持的看法方面没有差异。

结论

非正式照料者在提供照料方面发挥着关键的社会和经济作用。癌症照料者在数量上比非癌症照料者占比更大。随着癌症发病率的上升,志愿性癌症照料劳动力的可持续性将依赖于尽量减轻照料负担。

相似文献

1
Caring at the end of life: do cancer caregivers differ from other caregivers?临终关怀:癌症护理者与其他护理者有何不同?
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Dec;5(5):513-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000495. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
2
Caregiver characteristics and bereavement needs: Findings from a population study.照顾者特征与丧亲需求:一项人群研究的结果
Palliat Med. 2017 May;31(5):465-474. doi: 10.1177/0269216316663855. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
3
Caregivers for people with end-stage lung disease: characteristics and unmet needs in the whole population.终末期肺病患者的照护者:全体人群中的特征与未满足的需求
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;3(4):753-62. doi: 10.2147/copd.s3890.
4
Populations who die without specialist palliative care: does lower uptake equate with unmet need?在没有专科姑息治疗的情况下死亡的人群:较低的接受率是否等同于未满足的需求?
Palliat Med. 2008 Jan;22(1):43-50. doi: 10.1177/0269216307085182.
5
Family Caregivers Who Would Be Unwilling to Provide Care at the End of Life Again: Findings from the Health Survey for England Population Survey.不愿在临终时再次提供护理的家庭照顾者:来自英格兰健康调查人口调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0146960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146960. eCollection 2016.
6
Who provides care for people dying of cancer? A comparison of a rural and metropolitan cohort in a South Australian bereaved population study.谁为癌症临终患者提供护理?南澳大利亚丧亲人群研究中农村和城市队列的比较。
Aust J Rural Health. 2015 Feb;23(1):24-31. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12168.
7
Caregiver Expectations: Predictors of a Worse Than Expected Caregiving Experience at the End of Life.照料者期望:临终时照料体验比预期更糟的预测因素。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Oct;50(4):453-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 May 21.
8
Young caregivers in the end-of-life setting: a population-based profile of an emerging group.临终关怀中的年轻照护者:一个新兴群体的基于人群的特征描述。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Oct;13(10):1225-35. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0004.
9
Service preferences among family caregivers of the terminally ill.晚期患者家庭照顾者的服务偏好
J Palliat Med. 2005 Feb;8(1):69-78. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.69.
10
Comparing the experiences of rural and urban family caregivers of the terminally ill.比较农村和城市临终患者家庭照料者的经历。
Rural Remote Health. 2013 Jan-Mar;13(1):2250. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors that influence the preferences for telehealth among family caregivers of disabled elders: a qualitative study.影响残疾老年人家庭照顾者对远程医疗偏好的因素:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 May 21;8:100351. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100351. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Perspectives of telemedicine-based services among family caregivers of patients with end-of-life cancer: a qualitative study in mainland China.基于远程医疗的服务在临终癌症患者家庭照护者中的观点:中国大陆的一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 12;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01347-0.
3
Identifying the prevalence of unmet supportive care needs among family caregivers of cancer patients: an Italian investigation on home palliative care setting.
识别癌症患者家庭照顾者未满足的支持性护理需求的普遍性:意大利家庭临终关怀环境下的一项调查。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Apr;30(4):3451-3461. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06655-2. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
4
Emotion regulation therapy for cancer caregivers-an open trial of a mechanism-targeted approach to addressing caregiver distress.癌症护理者的情绪调节疗法——一种针对解决护理者困扰的机制性方法的开放性试验。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 May 20;10(2):413-422. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby104.
5
Unique characteristics of informal hospice cancer caregiving.临终关怀癌症非正式护理的独特特征。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):2121-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2570-z. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
6
There is a mismatch between the medicare benefit package and the preferences of patients with cancer and their caregivers.医疗保险福利套餐与癌症患者及其护理人员的偏好之间存在不匹配。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 1;32(28):3163-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.2605. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
7
On Goldilocks, care coordination, and palliative care: making it 'just right'.论“刚刚好”原则、护理协调与姑息治疗:使其恰到好处
Prim Care Respir J. 2014 Mar;23(1):8-10. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2014.00017.