Mauri Davide, Tsiara Anna, Valachis Antonis, Kalopita Konstantina, Tsali Lampriani, Tolis Panagiotis, Polyzos Nikolaos P
General Hospital of Lamia, Lamia, Greece.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2013 Jun;3(2):155-60. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000227. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
Cancer cachexia is a common associate of cancer and has a negative impact on patients' survival. Nonetheless, cancer cachexia assessment and management are frequently less than satisfactory in daily practice.
To scrutinise global cancer cachexia awareness and relative web guideline implementation among oncology societies.
Systematical identification of scientific and policymaker oncology societies and their guideline implementation on cancer cachexia. Assessment of the general level of awareness on cancer cachexia and evaluation of intercontinental and national variations on guideline implementation.
144,000 web pages were scrutinised, and 275 oncology societies identified covering a large array of oncology setting (educational/clinical/research/policymaker); 71 were international (African, American, Asian, European, Oceania and Intercontinental), 110 belonged to the top 10 countries with the highest development index and 94 pertained to 10 countries with a long lasting tradition in medical oncology (not included in the top 10 high developed countries). Overall, only 10/275 web sites provided guidelines; six of them (2.2%) provided guidelines for physicians and four (0.7%) for patients. Half of the guidelines (4/10) were outdated. All guidelines for physicians reported references, while only one of the recommendations for patients reported references to support its sentences.
Cancer cachexia global awareness appears extremely low; guideline implementation on the web was inconsistent for any category analysed (nation vs continent vs international vs society type vs physician vs patient oriented) and for updating.
癌症恶病质是癌症常见的伴发症,对患者生存有负面影响。然而,在日常实践中,癌症恶病质的评估和管理往往不尽人意。
审视肿瘤学会对全球癌症恶病质的认知及相关网络指南的实施情况。
系统识别科学和政策制定方面的肿瘤学会及其在癌症恶病质方面的指南实施情况。评估癌症恶病质的总体认知水平,并评价指南实施在洲际和国家层面的差异。
共审查了144,000个网页,识别出275个肿瘤学会,涵盖大量肿瘤学领域(教育/临床/研究/政策制定);其中71个是国际学会(非洲、美洲、亚洲、欧洲、大洋洲及洲际学会),110个属于发展指数最高的前10个国家,94个属于在医学肿瘤学方面有悠久传统的10个国家(不包括前10个高度发达国家)。总体而言,只有10/275个网站提供了指南;其中6个(2.2%)为医生提供了指南,4个(0.7%)为患者提供了指南。一半的指南(4/10)过时。所有医生指南都列出了参考文献,而患者指南中只有一条列出了参考文献来支持其内容。
全球对癌症恶病质的认知极低;对于所分析的任何类别(国家与大陆与国际与学会类型与医生与患者导向)以及更新情况,网络指南的实施都不一致。