Billings R J
Department of Medical Information Technology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, (U.K.).
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;72(2):114-7. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90171-5.
There are differences in morphology and latency between averaged lambda waves and averaged pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Averaging of lambda potentials recorded from Oz-Fz, Oz-Cz and Oz-Pz was synchronised from various points in the electro-oculogram (EOG) wave form, during targeted saccadic eye movements across a checkerboard which was subsequently used for pattern reversal VEPs. EOG and blinks (electrical and infra-red) were recorded and also averaged from eye movements performed in darkness. The initial, prominent, negative component in the averaged lambda wave was shown to be due to eye blink artefact caused by a partial lowering of the upper lid, each blink coinciding with every saccadic eye movement which elicited a lambda wave when scanning the pattern but not when the eye moved in darkness.
平均λ波与平均图形翻转视觉诱发电位(VEP)在形态和潜伏期上存在差异。在目标性扫视眼动穿过随后用于图形翻转VEP的棋盘格期间,从Oz-Fz、Oz-Cz和Oz-Pz记录的λ电位平均是从眼电图(EOG)波形中的不同点同步进行的。记录了EOG和眨眼(电和红外),并对在黑暗中进行的眼动也进行了平均。平均λ波中最初突出的负向成分被证明是由于上睑部分下垂引起的眨眼伪迹,每次眨眼都与每次扫视眼动同时发生,在扫描图形时扫视眼动会引发λ波,但在黑暗中眼睛移动时则不会。