Centre for Health Policy & Medical Research Council Health Policy Research Group, Johannesburg, South Africa;
Centre for Health Policy & Medical Research Council Health Policy Research Group, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Glob Health Action. 2014 Mar 18;7:23585. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.23585. eCollection 2014.
In South Africa, nurses are the largest category of the health care providers. Their optimal performance is critical for the successful implementation of impending health sector reforms.
This paper examines the occurrence of agency nursing, moonlighting, and overtime among nurses in South Africa, and the factors influencing moonlighting.
This cross-sectional survey was a one-stage cluster random sample of 80 hospitals in four South African provinces, selected with stratification from the public and private health sectors. On the survey day, all nurses working in critical care, theatre, emergency, maternity, and general medical and surgical wards completed a self-administered questionnaire after giving informed consent. In addition to demographic information, the questionnaire elicited information on the frequency of agency nursing, moonlighting, and overtime, and the nurses' reasons for doing moonlighting. Survey data were weighted and analysed using STATA version 12.
The majority of survey participants (n = 3,784) were South African (98.0%), female (92.7%), and employed in government (52.8%). Their mean age was 41.5 years (SD 10.4). The occurrence of moonlighting among nurses in the 12 months preceding the survey was 28.0% [95% CI: 24.2-32.1], the frequency of agency nursing was 37.8% [95% CI: 32.4-43.6], while 56.0% of nurses did overtime [95% CI: 51.4-60.4]. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, predictors of moonlighting were province, sector of primary employment, unit of work, category of nurse, and having children. The odds of moonlighting was 1.51 [95% CI: 1.03-2.21] times higher for private sector nurses than for public nurses, while the odds ratio for auxiliary nurses was 0.61 [95% CI: 0.47-0.79] compared to professional nurses. The odds of moonlighting was 1.49 [95% CI: 1.18-1.89] for nurses with children, compared to those without.
Agency nursing, moonlighting, and overtime are common among South African nurses, but have received insufficient policy attention. These issues need to be addressed as part of the implementation of comprehensive health workforce strategies.
在南非,护士是医疗保健提供者中最大的类别。他们的最佳表现对于成功实施即将到来的卫生部门改革至关重要。
本文研究了南非护士中代理护理、兼职和加班的发生情况,以及影响兼职的因素。
这是一项横断面调查,采用了南非四个省份的 80 家医院的一级聚类随机抽样,从公共和私营卫生部门进行分层选择。在调查日,所有在重症监护、手术室、急诊、妇产科和普通内科及外科病房工作的护士在知情同意后完成了一份自我管理的问卷。除了人口统计学信息外,问卷还询问了代理护理、兼职和加班的频率,以及护士兼职的原因。使用 STATA 版本 12 对调查数据进行加权和分析。
大多数调查参与者(n=3784)是南非人(98.0%)、女性(92.7%)和政府雇员(52.8%)。他们的平均年龄为 41.5 岁(SD 10.4)。在调查前 12 个月,护士兼职的发生率为 28.0%[95%可信区间:24.2-32.1],代理护理的频率为 37.8%[95%可信区间:32.4-43.6],而 56.0%的护士加班[95%可信区间:51.4-60.4]。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,兼职的预测因素包括省份、主要就业部门、工作单位、护士类别和有子女。与公共护士相比,私营部门护士兼职的可能性高 1.51 倍[95%可信区间:1.03-2.21],而辅助护士与专业护士相比,兼职的可能性低 0.61 倍[95%可信区间:0.47-0.79]。与没有子女的护士相比,有子女的护士兼职的可能性高 1.49 倍[95%可信区间:1.18-1.89]。
代理护理、兼职和加班在南非护士中很常见,但政策关注不足。这些问题需要作为全面卫生人力战略实施的一部分加以解决。