• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Activation, self-management, engagement, and retention in behavioral health care: a randomized clinical trial of the DECIDE intervention.行为健康护理中的激活、自我管理、参与和保持:DECIDE 干预的随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 May;71(5):557-65. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4519.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Effectiveness of a Question Prompt List Intervention for Older Patients Considering Major Surgery: A Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial.针对考虑接受重大手术的老年患者的问题提示清单干预措施的有效性:一项多中心随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jan 1;155(1):6-13. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3778.
4
Effect of a Coordinated Community and Chronic Care Model Team Intervention vs Usual Care on Systolic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: The SUCCEED Randomized Clinical Trial.社区与慢性病护理模式协同团队干预与常规护理对中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者收缩压的影响:SUCCEED随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036227. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36227.
5
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
6
Interactive Voice Response-Based Self-management for Chronic Back Pain: The COPES Noninferiority Randomized Trial.基于交互式语音应答的慢性背痛自我管理:COPES非劣效性随机试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):765-773. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0223.
7
Effectiveness of Online Collaborative Care for Treating Mood and Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.初级保健中在线协作护理治疗情绪和焦虑障碍的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 1;75(1):56-64. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3379.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Interventions to increase patient and family involvement in escalation of care for acute life-threatening illness in community health and hospital settings.增加患者和家属参与社区卫生和医院环境中急性危及生命疾病治疗升级的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):CD012829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012829.pub2.
10
Efficacy of a Mobile App-Based Intervention for Young Adults With Anxiety Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于移动应用程序的干预措施对焦虑障碍青年的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2428372. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28372.

引用本文的文献

1
Improvements in psychological distress in patients participating in a cooking programme following digestive cancer surgery: A retrospective, propensity score-matched pilot study.消化道癌症手术后参加烹饪项目患者心理困扰的改善:一项回顾性、倾向评分匹配的试点研究。
Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Sep;86(9):615-621. doi: 10.1177/03080226231169831. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
2
Putting measurement-based care into action: a multi-method study of the benefits of integrating routine client feedback in coordinated specialty care programs for early psychosis.将基于测量的护理付诸实践:一项关于在早期精神病协调专科护理项目中整合常规客户反馈的益处的多方法研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 2;24(1):871. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06258-1.
3
Engaging Youth Voice and Family Partnerships to Improve Children's Mental Health Outcomes.动员青少年的声音和家庭合作,改善儿童心理健康成果。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2024 Jul;33(3):343-354. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2024.02.004. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
Effect of empowerment: how and when do high-involvement work practices influence elder employees' innovative performance?赋能的影响:高参与度工作实践如何以及何时影响老年员工的创新绩效?
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 5;15:1336120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1336120. eCollection 2024.
5
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
6
Do health education initiatives assist socioeconomically disadvantaged populations? A systematic review and meta-analyses.健康教育举措是否有助于社会经济处境不利人群?系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15329-z.
7
A pilot randomized controlled trial of a lay telephone coaching and web-based intervention for postpartum depression and anxiety: The MPOWER study.一项针对产后抑郁和焦虑的非专业电话辅导及基于网络干预的试点随机对照试验:MPOWER研究。
Internet Interv. 2022 Dec 23;31:100597. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100597. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
"If he doesn't buy in, it's a waste of time": Perspectives from diverse parents and adolescents on engaging children in ADHD treatment.“如果他不接受,那就是浪费时间”:来自不同家长和青少年的观点,探讨如何让孩子参与 ADHD 治疗。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Oct;55(5):1190-1200. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01473-x. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
9
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
10
Patient Perceived Involvement in Their Treatment is Influenced by Factors Other Than Independently Rated Clinician Communication Effectiveness.患者对自身治疗的感知参与度受到独立评估的临床医生沟通效果以外的因素影响。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Dec 8;8:23743735211065261. doi: 10.1177/23743735211065261. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining implementation of a patient activation and self-management intervention within the context of an effectiveness trial.在一项有效性试验的背景下,考察患者激活与自我管理干预措施的实施情况。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Nov;41(6):777-87. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0527-z.
2
When seeing the same physician, highly activated patients have better care experiences than less activated patients.当患者看到同一位医生时,高活跃度的患者比低活跃度的患者有更好的就医体验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jul;32(7):1299-305. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1409.
3
Exploring factors influencing asthma control and asthma-specific health-related quality of life among children.探讨影响儿童哮喘控制和哮喘特异性健康相关生活质量的因素。
Respir Res. 2013 Feb 23;14(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-26.
4
Survey shows that fewer than a third of patient-centered medical home practices engage patients in quality improvement.调查显示,参与以患者为中心的医疗之家实践的患者中,参与质量改进的不到三分之一。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):368-75. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1183.
5
Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice.共同决策:探讨将其纳入常规临床实践的关键要素和障碍。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):276-84. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1078.
6
A demonstration of shared decision making in primary care highlights barriers to adoption and potential remedies.初级保健中共享决策的演示突出了采用的障碍和潜在的补救措施。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):268-75. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1084.
7
Patients with mental health needs are engaged in asking questions, but physicians' responses vary.有心理健康需求的患者参与提问,但医生的回应各不相同。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):259-67. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0962.
8
Patients with lower activation associated with higher costs; delivery systems should know their patients' 'scores'.与较低激活相关的患者具有较高的成本;交付系统应该了解患者的“分数”。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):216-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1064.
9
What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs.关于患者激活的证据表明:更好的健康结果和护理体验;关于成本的数据较少。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):207-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061.
10
Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs.通过共同决策改善医疗服务并降低成本。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 3;368(1):6-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1209500.

行为健康护理中的激活、自我管理、参与和保持:DECIDE 干预的随机临床试验。

Activation, self-management, engagement, and retention in behavioral health care: a randomized clinical trial of the DECIDE intervention.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 May;71(5):557-65. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4519.

DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4519
PMID:24647680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4311517/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Given minority patients' unequal access to quality care, patient activation and self-management strategies have been suggested as a promising approach to improving mental health care.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the DECIDE (Decide the problem; Explore the questions; Closed or open-ended questions; Identify the who, why, or how of the problem; Direct questions to your health care professional; Enjoy a shared solution) intervention, an educational strategy that teaches patients to ask questions and make collaborative decisions with their health care professional, improves patient activation and self-management, as well as engagement and retention in behavioral health care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: In this multisite randomized clinical trial performed from February 1, 2009, through October 9, 2011 (date of last follow-up interview), we recruited 647 English- or Spanish-speaking patients 18 to 70 years old from 13 outpatient community mental health clinics across 5 states and 1 US territory. A total of 722 patients were included in analyses of secondary outcomes.

INTERVENTIONS

Three DECIDE training sessions delivered by a care manager vs giving patients a brochure on management of behavioral health.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes were patient assessment of activation (Patient Activation Scale) and self-management (Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions). Secondary outcomes included patient engagement (proportion of visits attended of those scheduled) and retention (attending at least 4 visits in the 6 months after the baseline research assessment), collected through medical record review or electronic records.

RESULTS

Patients assigned to DECIDE reported significant increases in activation (mean β = 1.74, SD = 0.58; P = .003) and self-management (mean β = 2.42, SD = 0.90; P = .008) relative to control patients, but there was no evidence of an effect on engagement or retention in care.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The DECIDE intervention appears to help patients learn to effectively ask questions and participate in decisions about their behavioral health care, but a health care professional component might be needed to augment engagement in care. DECIDE appears to have promise as a strategy for changing the role of minority patients in behavioral health care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01226329

摘要

重要性

鉴于少数族裔患者获得高质量医疗服务的机会不平等,患者激活和自我管理策略已被认为是改善精神卫生保健的一种有前途的方法。

目的

确定 DECIDE(决定问题;探索问题;封闭式或开放式问题;确定问题的相关人员、原因或方式;向您的医疗保健专业人员提问;共同解决问题)干预措施是否可以改善患者的激活和自我管理,以及参与和保留在行为健康护理中的作用。DECIDE 是一种教育策略,教患者向他们的医疗保健专业人员提问并共同做出决策。

设计、地点和患者:这是一项多地点随机临床试验,于 2009 年 2 月 1 日至 2011 年 10 月 9 日(最后随访访谈日期)进行,我们从 5 个州和 1 个美国领土的 13 个社区精神卫生门诊招募了 647 名 18 至 70 岁的英语或西班牙语患者。共有 722 名患者被纳入次要结局分析。

干预措施

由护理经理提供 3 次 DECIDE 培训课程,而不是给患者一本关于行为健康管理的小册子。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是患者对激活(患者激活量表)和自我管理(医患互动感知效能)的评估。次要结果包括通过病历审查或电子记录收集的患者参与度(计划就诊次数中的就诊比例)和保留率(在基线研究评估后 6 个月内至少就诊 4 次)。

结果

与对照组相比,接受 DECIDE 治疗的患者在激活(平均β=1.74,SD=0.58;P=0.003)和自我管理(平均β=2.42,SD=0.90;P=0.008)方面的报告显著增加,但在参与护理或保留方面没有证据表明有影响。

结论和相关性

DECIDE 干预措施似乎有助于患者学习有效地询问问题并参与他们的行为保健护理决策,但可能需要医疗保健专业人员的参与来增强对护理的参与。DECIDE 似乎有希望成为改变少数族裔患者在行为保健护理中角色的一种策略。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01226329