Berry Dominic
School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, W Yorkshire LS2 9JT, UK.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2014 Jun;46:25-37. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
In the early twentieth century, Wilhelm Johannsen proposed his pure line theory and the genotype/phenotype distinction, work that is prized as one of the most important founding contributions to genetics and Mendelian plant breeding. Most historians have already concluded that pure line theory did not change breeding practices directly. Instead, breeding became more orderly as a consequence of pure line theory, which structured breeding programmes and eliminated external heritable influences. This incremental change then explains how and why the large multi-national seed companies that we know today were created; pure lines invited standardisation and economies of scale that the latter were designed to exploit. Rather than focus on breeding practice, this paper examines the plant varietal market itself. It focusses upon work conducted by the National Institute of Agricultural Botany (NIAB) during the interwar years, and in doing so demonstrates that, on the contrary, the pure line was actually only partially accepted by the industry. Moreover, claims that contradicted the logic of the pure line were not merely tolerated by the agricultural geneticists affiliated with NIAB, but were acknowledged and legitimised by them. The history of how and why the plant breeding industry was transformed remains to be written.
在20世纪初,威廉·约翰森提出了他的纯系理论以及基因型/表型的区分,这项工作被誉为遗传学和孟德尔植物育种最重要的奠基性贡献之一。大多数历史学家已经得出结论,纯系理论并没有直接改变育种实践。相反,由于纯系理论,育种变得更加有序,该理论构建了育种计划并消除了外部可遗传影响。这种渐进的变化进而解释了我们今天所知的大型跨国种子公司是如何以及为何创立的;纯系促成了标准化和规模经济,而后者正是为利用这些而设计的。本文并非关注育种实践,而是考察植物品种市场本身。它聚焦于国家农业植物研究所(NIAB)在两次世界大战之间所做的工作,并借此表明,恰恰相反,纯系实际上仅被该行业部分接受。此外,与纯系逻辑相悖的主张不仅被NIAB附属的农业遗传学家所容忍,还得到了他们的认可和合法化。植物育种行业如何以及为何转型的历史仍有待书写。