Visser Troy A W
School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 20;9(3):e91278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091278. eCollection 2014.
While poor reading is often associated with phonological deficits, many studies suggest that visual processing might also be impaired. In particular, recent research has indicated that poor readers show impaired spatial visual attention spans in partial and whole report tasks. Given the similarities between competition-based accounts for reduced visual attention span and similar explanations for impairments in sequential object processing, the present work examined whether poor readers show deficits in their "temporal attention span"--that is, their ability to rapidly and accurately process sequences of consecutive target items.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Poor and normal readers monitored a sequential stream of visual items for two (TT condition) or three (TTT condition) consecutive target digits. Target identification was examined using both unconditional and conditional measures of accuracy in order to gauge the overall likelihood of identifying a target and the likelihood of identifying a target given successful identification of previous items. Compared to normal readers, poor readers showed small but consistent deficits in identification across targets whether unconditional or conditional accuracy was used. Additionally, in the TTT condition, final-target conditional accuracy was poorer than unconditional accuracy, particularly for poor readers, suggesting a substantial cost arising from processing the previous two targets that was not present in normal readers.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Mirroring the differences found between poor and normal readers in spatial visual attention span, the present findings suggest two principal differences between the temporal attention spans of poor and normal readers. First, the consistent pattern of reduced performance across targets suggests increased competition amongst items within the same span for poor readers. Second, the steeper decline in final target performance amongst poor readers in the TTT condition suggests a reduction in the extent of their temporal attention span.
虽然阅读能力差通常与语音缺陷有关,但许多研究表明视觉处理能力也可能受损。特别是,最近的研究表明,阅读能力差的人在部分和整体报告任务中表现出空间视觉注意力广度受损。鉴于基于竞争的视觉注意力广度降低的解释与顺序物体处理受损的类似解释之间存在相似性,本研究探讨了阅读能力差的人在“时间注意力广度”方面是否存在缺陷,即他们快速准确地处理连续目标项目序列的能力。
方法/主要发现:阅读能力差和正常的读者监测一系列连续的视觉项目,以寻找两个(TT条件)或三个(TTT条件)连续的目标数字。使用无条件和条件准确性测量来检查目标识别,以评估识别目标的总体可能性以及在前一个项目成功识别的情况下识别目标的可能性。与正常读者相比,无论使用无条件还是条件准确性,阅读能力差的读者在跨目标识别方面都表现出微小但一致的缺陷。此外,在TTT条件下,最终目标的条件准确性低于无条件准确性,尤其是对于阅读能力差的读者,这表明处理前两个目标会产生大量成本,而正常读者则不存在这种情况。
结论/意义:与阅读能力差和正常的读者在空间视觉注意力广度上的差异相似,本研究结果表明阅读能力差和正常的读者在时间注意力广度上存在两个主要差异。首先,跨目标表现一致下降的模式表明,阅读能力差的读者在同一跨度内项目之间的竞争加剧。其次,阅读能力差的读者在TTT条件下最终目标表现的急剧下降表明他们的时间注意力广度有所减少。