Suppr超能文献

血液透析患者的透析液钠处方与血压

Dialysate sodium prescription and blood pressure in hemodialysis patients.

作者信息

Hecking Manfred, Karaboyas Angelo, Rayner Hugh, Saran Rajiv, Sen Ananda, Inaba Masaaki, Bommer Jürgen, Hörl Walter H, Pisoni Ronald L, Robinson Bruce M, Sunder-Plassmann Gere, Port Friedrich K

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine III-Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria;

Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI;

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2014 Sep;27(9):1160-9. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu040. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diffusive sodium removal has been recommended to control hypertension in hemodialysis patients. Recent evidence on hospitalizations and mortality, however, challenged the benefit of lower dialysate sodium prescriptions and ignited a debate in the dialysis community. We therefore studied the relationship between dialysate sodium and blood pressure over the longer term.

METHODS

We used multiply adjusted linear mixed models to estimate the association between dialysate sodium and predialysis systolic blood pressure (SBP) as well as change in SBP (delta SBP; postdialysis minus predialysis) in 23,962 patients from the international Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study.

RESULTS

We found that 43% of hemodialysis facilities had variable (individualized) dialysate sodium prescriptions (125-155 mEq/L), whereas 57% had uniform dialysate sodium prescriptions (135-145 mEq/L) for ≥90% patients. Between-group comparisons of these 2 facility types suggested that dialysate sodium, when variably prescribed, might have been used to modify predialysis SBP (P interaction = 0.01) and perhaps delta SBP levels (P interaction = 0.08). Within facilities not prone to indication bias, because dialysate sodium was not variable, higher uniform dialysate sodium (per 2 mEq/L) was associated with slightly higher SBP (+0.9 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.1-1.6 among all patients; +1.7 mm Hg, 95% CI = 0.1-3.2 among patients not treated with blood pressure medication) and no increase in delta SBP.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients assigned to hemodialysis facilities with uniformly higher dialysate sodium do not have markedly higher predialysis SBP, providing rather limited support for lowering dialysate sodium to control hypertension, particularly in view of hospitalization and mortality risks associated with lower dialysate sodium.

摘要

背景

已推荐采用弥散性钠清除来控制血液透析患者的高血压。然而,近期有关住院率和死亡率的证据对降低透析液钠处方的益处提出了质疑,并在透析领域引发了一场争论。因此,我们对透析液钠与血压之间的长期关系进行了研究。

方法

我们使用多重校正线性混合模型,对来自国际透析结果和实践模式研究的23962例患者的透析液钠与透析前收缩压(SBP)以及SBP的变化(ΔSBP;透析后减去透析前)之间的关联进行了估计。

结果

我们发现,43%的血液透析机构采用可变(个体化)透析液钠处方(125 - 155 mEq/L),而57%的机构对≥90%的患者采用统一的透析液钠处方(135 - 145 mEq/L)。这两种机构类型的组间比较表明,可变处方时,透析液钠可能被用于调整透析前SBP(P交互作用 = 0.01),或许还有ΔSBP水平(P交互作用 = 0.08)。在不存在指征偏倚的机构中,由于透析液钠不变,较高的统一透析液钠(每2 mEq/L)与略高的SBP相关(所有患者中为+0.9 mmHg,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.1 - 1.6;未服用降压药物的患者中为+1.7 mmHg,95% CI = 0.1 - 3.2),且ΔSBP无升高。

结论

被分配到透析液钠统一较高的血液透析机构的患者,透析前SBP并未显著升高,这为降低透析液钠以控制高血压提供的支持相当有限,特别是考虑到较低透析液钠与住院率和死亡率风险相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验