Suppr超能文献

西欧国家在心房颤动抗凝管理方面的差异。来自PREFER IN AF注册研究的数据。

Differences among western European countries in anticoagulation management of atrial fibrillation. Data from the PREFER IN AF registry.

作者信息

Le Heuzey Jean-Yves, Ammentorp Bettina, Darius Harald, De Caterina Raffaele, Schilling Richard John, Schmitt Josef, Zamorano José Luis, Kirchhof Paulus

机构信息

Prof. Jean-Yves Le Heuzey, Cardiology and Arrhythmology, Georges Pompidou Hospital, René Descartes University, 20, rue Leblanc, 75908 Paris Cedex, France, Tel. : +33 1 5609 37 01, E-mail:

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2014 May 5;111(5):833-41. doi: 10.1160/TH13-12-1007. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

Abstract

Due to improved implementation of guidelines, new scoring approaches to improve risk categorisation, and introduction of novel oral anticoagulants, medical management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is continuously improving. The PREFER in AF registry enrolled 7,243 consecutive patients with ECG-confirmed AF in seven European countries in 2012-2013 (mean age: 71.5 ± 10.7 years; 60.1% males; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score: 3.4). While patient characteristics were generally homogeneous across countries, anticoagulation management showed important differences: the proportion of patients taking vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) varied between 86.0% (in France) and 71.4% (in Italy). Warfarin was used predominantly in the UK and Italy (74.9% and 62.0%, respectively), phenprocoumon in Germany (74.1%), acenocoumarol in Spain (67.3%), and fluindione in France (61.8 %). The major sites for international normalised ratio (INR) measurements were biology laboratories in France, anticoagulation clinics in Italy, Spain, and the UK, and physicians' offices or self-measurement in Germany. Temporary VKA discontinuation and bridging with other anticoagulants was frequent (at least once in the previous 12 months for 22.9% of the patients, on average; ranging from 29.7% in Germany to 14.9% in the UK). Time in therapeutic range (TTR), defined as at least two of the last three available INR values between 2.0-3.0 prior to enrolment, ranged from 70.3% in Spain to 81.4% in Germany. TTR was constantly overestimated by physicians. While the type and half-lives of VKA as well as the mode of INR surveillance differed, overall quality of anticoagulation management by TTR was relatively homogenous in AF patients across countries.

摘要

由于指南实施的改进、用于改善风险分类的新评分方法以及新型口服抗凝药的引入,心房颤动(AF)患者的医疗管理在不断改善。2012年至2013年期间,AF领域的PREFER注册研究在7个欧洲国家连续纳入了7243例经心电图确诊的AF患者(平均年龄:71.5±10.7岁;男性占60.1%;平均CHA2DS2-VASc评分:3.4)。虽然各国患者特征总体较为相似,但抗凝管理存在重要差异:服用维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)的患者比例在86.0%(法国)至71.4%(意大利)之间。华法林在英国和意大利使用最为广泛(分别为74.9%和62.0%),苯丙香豆素在德国使用较多(74.1%),醋硝香豆素在西班牙使用较多(67.3%),氟茚二酮在法国使用较多(61.8%)。国际标准化比值(INR)测量的主要场所,在法国是生物实验室,在意大利、西班牙和英国是抗凝门诊,在德国是医生办公室或自我测量。VKA的临时停药及与其他抗凝药的桥接治疗很常见(平均而言,22.9%的患者在过去12个月内至少有过一次;范围从德国的29.7%到英国的14.9%)。治疗范围内时间(TTR)定义为入组前最后三个可用INR值中至少两个在2.0 - 3.0之间,其范围从西班牙的70.3%到德国的81.4%。医生对TTR的估计一直偏高。虽然VKA的类型和半衰期以及INR监测方式不同,但各国AF患者抗凝管理的总体质量按TTR衡量相对较为一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验