Mendoza Nohora Marcela, Cucunubá Zulma Milena, Aponte Samanda, González Nohora Elizabeth, Bernal Sindy Durley
Grupo de Parasitología, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia.
Grupo de Bioquímica, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia.
Biomedica. 2013 Oct-Dec;33(4):587-97. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v33i4.1464.
Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) have been postulated as a way to ensure access to malaria diagnosis in remote areas. Despite its widespread use, there are no field studies to evaluate the accuracy of the SD Bioline Malaria Antigen Pf/Pv in Colombia RDT.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the SD Bioline Malaria Antigen Pf/Pv® RDT in two departments endemic for malaria, comparing diagnosis with thick film corrected with PCR.
A retrospective study was carried out to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), concordance and sensitivity limits according to parasitemia ranges for the SD Bioline Malaria Antigen Pf/Pv ® test in Cordoba and Choco. The results were compared with microscopy corrected by PCR.
A total of 383 samples processed, 121 were positive (75 for P. vivax , 42 for P. falciparum and 4 for mixed infection) and 262 negative samples. P. vivax: sensitivity 92.0% (95% CI: 83.6-96.3), specificity 98.7% ( 95% CI: 96.7-99.5), PPV 94.5% (95% CI: 86.7-97.9), NPV 98.1% (95% CI: 95.8-99.1), Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.90 (0.80-1.00). P. falciparum: sensitivity 88.1% (95% CI: 75.0-94.8), specificity 97.9% (95% CI: 95.8-99.0), PPV 84.1% (95% CI: 70.6-92.1), NPV 98.5% (95% IC: 96.6-99.4), Cohen's kappa coefficient 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70-0.90).
The test performed well, being better for P. vivax as compared to P. falciparum. There are still difficulties of RDT to detect low parasitemias. The non amplification of Pfhrp2 and Pfhrp3 genes in two samples diagnosed as mixed infection, suggest a possible deletion of these two genes together.
快速诊断检测(RDT)被认为是确保偏远地区能够进行疟疾诊断的一种方式。尽管其广泛使用,但尚无实地研究评估哥伦比亚RDT中SD Bioline疟疾抗原Pf/Pv的准确性。
评估SD Bioline疟疾抗原Pf/Pv® RDT在两个疟疾流行省份的诊断准确性,并将其诊断结果与经PCR校正的厚涂片诊断结果进行比较。
开展一项回顾性研究,以评估科尔多瓦省和乔科省SD Bioline疟疾抗原Pf/Pv®检测根据疟原虫血症范围得出的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、一致性和敏感性限值。将结果与经PCR校正的显微镜检查结果进行比较。
共处理383份样本,其中121份为阳性(间日疟原虫75份,恶性疟原虫42份,混合感染4份),262份为阴性样本。间日疟原虫:敏感性92.0%(95%置信区间:83.6 - 96.3),特异性98.7%(95%置信区间:96.7 - 99.5),PPV 94.5%(95%置信区间:86.7 - 97.9),NPV 98.1%(95%置信区间:95.8 - 99.1),科恩kappa系数为0.90(0.80 - 1.00)。恶性疟原虫:敏感性88.1%(95%置信区间:75.0 - 94.8),特异性97.9%(95%置信区间:95.8 - 99.0),PPV 84.1%(95%置信区间:70.6 - 92.1),NPV 98.5%(95%置信区间:96.6 - 99.4),科恩kappa系数0.80(95%置信区间:0.70 - 0.90)。
该检测表现良好,对间日疟原虫的检测效果优于恶性疟原虫。RDT在检测低疟原虫血症方面仍存在困难。在两份被诊断为混合感染的样本中未扩增出Pfhrp2和Pfhrp3基因,提示这两个基因可能同时缺失。