Faintuch J S
Section of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Digestive Diseases, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1989 Mar;3(1):155-70.
Although a variety of surgical and nonsurgical techniques are available to palliate the symptoms of advanced colorectal carcinoma, the ideal approach remains undetermined. Such an approach must include efficacy, safety, convenience, and cost effectiveness. While much remains to be learned about the role of lasers in the management of colorectal carcinoma, endoscopic laser therapy fulfills many of the requirements of an ideal palliative therapy. Although differences in approaches and techniques exist, most investigators worldwide have achieved similar results with the Nd:YAG laser. International results and our own experience show that the laser is highly effective, with success rates approaching 90 per cent. The complications of laser therapy have included bleeding, perforation, abscess, and fistula formation as well as post-laser stricturing with an overall rate of 6 per cent. Since the procedure can be done as an outpatient and involves minimal preparation, endoscopic laser therapy certainly is a convenient form of palliative therapy. In times of increasing cost containment, analysis has been done to determine the cost effectiveness of laser therapy compared with abdominal perineal resection. Mellow and McCoy, using data from a private university affiliated hospital in the southwestern United States, have shown the cost of an abdominal perineal resection is nearly five times that of initial therapy with the Nd:YAG laser. Analysis of laser costs for both initial inpatient and outpatient therapy are presented in Table 6. Because follow-up laser treatments are required at 8- to 10-week intervals, an additional five to seven treatments can be anticipated in the following year. Presuming a median survival of 12 months, the total lifetime cost for outpatient laser therapy is less than half the overall cost of abdominal perineal resection. Endoscopic laser therapy has emerged as an excellent palliative therapy for advanced colorectal carcinoma. Unfortunately, we have reached a plateau in our clinical understanding and utilization of the Nd:YAG laser for vaporization and coagulation of tumors. The continued growth of laser applications will be dependent on better understanding of the fundamentals of the laser tissue interaction. By expanding knowledge of optical and thermal properties of tissue, we will be able to explore the utilization of new wavelengths and their application to ablation, coagulation, and excision. The use of dyes that would be taken up selectively by malignant tissue may help identify and allow more effective ablation of tissue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
尽管有多种手术和非手术技术可用于缓解晚期结直肠癌的症状,但理想的治疗方法仍未确定。这样的方法必须包括有效性、安全性、便利性和成本效益。虽然关于激光在结直肠癌治疗中的作用仍有许多有待了解之处,但内镜激光治疗满足了理想姑息治疗的许多要求。尽管在方法和技术上存在差异,但全球大多数研究人员使用钕钇铝石榴石激光都取得了相似的结果。国际上的研究结果以及我们自己的经验表明,激光非常有效,成功率接近90%。激光治疗的并发症包括出血、穿孔、脓肿和瘘管形成,以及激光后狭窄,总体发生率为6%。由于该手术可在门诊进行且准备工作极少,内镜激光治疗无疑是一种方便的姑息治疗方式。在成本控制日益严格的时代,已进行分析以确定激光治疗与腹会阴联合切除术相比的成本效益。梅洛和麦科伊利用美国西南部一家私立大学附属医院的数据表明,腹会阴联合切除术的成本几乎是初次使用钕钇铝石榴石激光治疗成本的五倍。表6列出了初次住院和门诊治疗的激光成本分析。由于需要每隔8至10周进行一次后续激光治疗,预计次年还需要额外进行五至七次治疗。假设中位生存期为12个月,门诊激光治疗的终身总成本不到腹会阴联合切除术总成本的一半。内镜激光治疗已成为晚期结直肠癌的一种出色姑息治疗方法。不幸的是,我们在临床对钕钇铝石榴石激光用于肿瘤汽化和凝固的理解及应用方面已达到一个平台期。激光应用的持续发展将取决于对激光与组织相互作用基本原理的更好理解。通过扩展对组织光学和热学性质的认识,我们将能够探索新波长的利用及其在消融、凝固和切除中的应用。使用能被恶性组织选择性摄取的染料可能有助于识别并更有效地消融组织。(摘要截选至400词)