• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

破裂性颅内动静脉畸形的放射外科治疗

Radiosurgery for ruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

作者信息

Ding Dale, Yen Chun-Po, Starke Robert M, Xu Zhiyuan, Sheehan Jason P

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;121(2):470-81. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.JNS131605. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

DOI:10.3171/2014.2.JNS131605
PMID:24655098
Abstract

OBJECT

Ruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are at a significantly greater risk for future hemorrhage than unruptured lesions, thereby necessitating treatment in the majority of cases. In a retrospective, single-center study, the authors describe the outcomes after radiosurgery in a large cohort of patients with ruptured AVMs.

METHODS

From an institutional review board-approved, prospectively collected AVM radiosurgery database, the authors identified all patients with a history of AVM rupture. They analyzed obliteration rates in all patients in whom radiological follow-up data were available (n = 639). However, to account for the latency period associated with radiosurgery, only those patients with more than 2 years of radiological follow-up and those with earlier AMV obliteration were included in the analysis of prognostic factors related to obliteration and complications. This resulted in a cohort of 565 patients with ruptured AVMs for whom data were analyzed; these patients had a median radiological follow-up of 57 months and a median age of 29 years. Twenty-one percent of the patients underwent preradiosurgery embolization. The median volume and prescription dose were 2.1 cm(3) and 22 Gy, respectively. The Spetzler-Martin grade was III or higher in 56% of patients, the median radiosurgery-based AVM score was 1.08, and the Virginia Radiosurgery AVM Scale (RAS) score was 3 to 4 points in 44%. Survival and regression analyses were performed to determine obliteration rates over time and predictors of obliteration and complications.

RESULTS

In the overall population of 639 patients with ruptured AVMs, the obliteration rate was 11.1% based on MRI only (71 of 639 patients), 56.0% based on angiography (358 of 639), and 67.1% based on combined modalities (429 of 639 patients). In the cohort of patients with 2 years of follow-up or an earlier AVM obliteration, the cumulative obliteration rate was 76% and the actuarial obliteration rates were 41% and 64% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the absence of preradiosurgery embolization (p < 0.001), increased prescription dose (p = 0.001), the presence of a single draining vein (p = 0.046), no postradiosurgery-related hemorrhage (p = 0.007), and lower Virginia RAS score (p = 0.020) as independent predictors of obliteration. The annual risk of a hemorrhage occurring during the latency period was 2.0% and the rate of hemorrhage-related morbidity and mortality was 1.6%. Multivariate analysis showed that decreased prescription dose (p < 0.001) and multiple draining veins (p = 0.003) were independent predictors of postradiosurgery hemorrhage. The rates of symptomatic and permanent radiation-induced changes were 8% and 2.7%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, a single draining vein (p < 0.001) and higher Virginia RAS score (p = 0.005) were independent predictors of radiation-induced changes following radiosurgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiosurgery effectively treats ruptured AVMs with an acceptably low risk-to-benefit ratio. For patients with ruptured AVMs, favorable outcomes are more likely when preradiosurgical embolization is avoided and a higher prescription dose can be delivered.

摘要

目的

与未破裂的颅内动静脉畸形(AVM)相比,破裂的AVM未来出血风险显著更高,因此在大多数情况下需要进行治疗。在一项回顾性单中心研究中,作者描述了一大群破裂AVM患者接受放射外科治疗后的结果。

方法

作者从机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性收集的AVM放射外科数据库中,识别出所有有AVM破裂病史的患者。他们分析了所有有放射学随访数据的患者(n = 639)的闭塞率。然而,为了考虑与放射外科相关的潜伏期,在分析与闭塞和并发症相关的预后因素时,仅纳入那些有超过2年放射学随访以及早期AVM闭塞的患者。这产生了一个对565例破裂AVM患者的数据进行分析的队列;这些患者的放射学随访中位数为57个月,中位年龄为29岁。21%的患者在放射外科治疗前行栓塞治疗。中位体积和处方剂量分别为2.1 cm³和22 Gy。56%的患者Spetzler-Martin分级为III级或更高,基于放射外科的AVM评分中位数为1.08,44%的患者弗吉尼亚放射外科AVM量表(RAS)评分为3至4分。进行生存和回归分析以确定随时间的闭塞率以及闭塞和并发症的预测因素。

结果

在639例破裂AVM患者的总体人群中,仅基于MRI的闭塞率为11.1%(639例患者中的71例),基于血管造影的闭塞率为56.0%(639例中的358例),基于联合方式的闭塞率为67.1%(639例患者中的429例)。在有2年随访或早期AVM闭塞的患者队列中,累积闭塞率为76%,3年和5年的精算闭塞率分别为41%和64%。多变量分析确定,放射外科治疗前未进行栓塞(p < 0.001)、处方剂量增加(p = 0.001)、存在单一引流静脉(p = 0.046)、无放射外科治疗后相关出血(p = 0.007)以及较低的弗吉尼亚RAS评分(p = 0.020)是闭塞的独立预测因素。潜伏期内每年出血风险为2.0%,出血相关的发病率和死亡率为1.6%。多变量分析表明,处方剂量降低(p < 0.001)和多条引流静脉(p = 0.003)是放射外科治疗后出血的独立预测因素。有症状和永久性放射诱导改变的发生率分别为8%和2.7%。在多变量分析中,单一引流静脉(p < 0.001)和较高的弗吉尼亚RAS评分(p = 0.005)是放射外科治疗后放射诱导改变的独立预测因素。

结论

放射外科能有效治疗破裂的AVM,风险效益比可接受且较低。对于破裂AVM患者,避免放射外科治疗前的栓塞治疗并给予更高的处方剂量时,更有可能获得良好的治疗结果。

相似文献

1
Radiosurgery for ruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations.破裂性颅内动静脉畸形的放射外科治疗
J Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;121(2):470-81. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.JNS131605. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
2
Radiosurgery for low-grade intracranial arteriovenous malformations.低级别颅内动静脉畸形的放射外科治疗
J Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;121(2):457-67. doi: 10.3171/2014.1.JNS131713. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
3
Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade III arteriovenous malformations.伽玛刀治疗斯佩泽-马丁分级 III 级动静脉畸形
J Neurosurg. 2014 Apr;120(4):959-69. doi: 10.3171/2013.12.JNS131041. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
4
International multicenter cohort study of pediatric brain arteriovenous malformations. Part 2: Outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery.小儿脑动静脉畸形的国际多中心队列研究。第2部分:立体定向放射外科治疗后的结果。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Feb;19(2):136-148. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.PEDS16284. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
5
Gamma Knife surgical treatment for partially embolized cerebral arteriovenous malformations.伽玛刀手术治疗部分栓塞的脑动静脉畸形
J Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;124(3):767-76. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS142711. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
6
Effect of prior hemorrhage on intracranial arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery outcomes.既往出血对颅内动静脉畸形放射外科治疗结果的影响。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;39(1):53-62. doi: 10.1159/000369959. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
7
Radiosurgery for patients with unruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations.未破裂颅内动静脉畸形患者的放射外科治疗。
J Neurosurg. 2013 May;118(5):958-66. doi: 10.3171/2013.2.JNS121239. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
8
Radiosurgery for cerebellar arteriovenous malformations: does infratentorial location affect outcome?小脑动静脉畸形的放射外科治疗:幕下位置是否影响疗效?
World Neurosurg. 2014 Jul-Aug;82(1-2):e209-17. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
9
Stereotactic radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade III arteriovenous malformations: an international multicenter study.Stereotactic radiosurgery 用于 Spetzler-Martin 分级 III 级动静脉畸形:一项国际多中心研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):859-871. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152564. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
10
Radiosurgery for temporal lobe arteriovenous malformations: effect of temporal location on seizure outcomes.颞叶动静脉畸形的放射外科治疗:颞部位置对癫痫发作结果的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Oct;123(4):924-34. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS141807. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcomes and safety of Gamma Knife radiosurgery in pediatric arteriovenous malformations.小儿动静脉畸形伽玛刀放射外科治疗的长期疗效及安全性
Childs Nerv Syst. 2025 Apr 15;41(1):157. doi: 10.1007/s00381-025-06776-7.
2
Long-Term Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Focused Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Based on Rupture Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于破裂状态的立体定向放射外科聚焦治疗脑动静脉畸形的长期结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Stroke Res. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1007/s12975-025-01339-z.
3
Reporting of angiographic studies in patients diagnosed with a cerebral arteriovenous malformation: a systematic review.
诊断为脑动静脉畸形患者的血管造影研究报告:一项系统评价
F1000Res. 2024 Nov 25;12:1252. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.139256.3. eCollection 2023.
4
Outcome of early versus late primary embolization in ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations.破裂脑动静脉畸形早期与晚期初次栓塞的结果
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 2:15910199241277583. doi: 10.1177/15910199241277583.
5
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in Spetzler Martin grades 4 and 5 arteriovenous malformations in the pediatric population: Is it a viable alternative?儿童 Spetzler-Martin 分级 4 和 5 动静脉畸形的低分割立体定向放射治疗:是否可行的替代方案?
Childs Nerv Syst. 2024 Apr;40(4):1185-1192. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-06244-0. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
6
Transvenous embolization of hemorrhagic brain arteriovenous malformations: Case reports and literature review.经静脉栓塞治疗出血性脑动静脉畸形:病例报告及文献综述。
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 22;13:813207. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.813207. eCollection 2022.
7
Gamma Knife radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.伽玛刀放射外科治疗脑动静脉畸形:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Jun;45(3):1987-2004. doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01751-1. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
8
The 20th Gray lecture 2019: health and heavy ions.2019 年第 20 届格雷讲座:健康与重离子。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Nov 1;93(1115):20200172. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200172. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
9
What is the best therapeutic approach to a pediatric patient with a deep-seated brain AVM?对于患有深部脑动静脉畸形的儿科患者,最佳的治疗方法是什么?
Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Jun;42(2):409-416. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01101-8. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
10
Application of Multimodal Navigation together with Fluorescein Angiography in Microsurgical Treatment of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations.多模态导航联合荧光血管造影在脑动静脉畸形显微手术治疗中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 1;7(1):14822. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05913-w.