Kim Youn Jeong, Jun Yoon Hee, Kim Yang Ree, Park Kang Gyun, Park Yeon Joon, Kang Ji Young, Kim Sang Il
Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St, Mary's hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Mar 24;14:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-161.
Whether the combination of antimicrobial therapy is a factor in mortality in Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia remains to be elucidated. This study investigated the risk factors for mortality in P. aeruginosa bacteremia patients and the influence of adequate antimicrobial therapy and combination therapy on clinical outcomes.
This retrospective study analyzed data of 234 patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia at a 1,200-bed tertiary teaching university hospital in South Korea between January 2010 and December 2012. Factors associated with mortality were determined. Mortality was compared in patients with adequate empirical and targeted combination therapy, and monotherapy, and inappropriate therapy.
A total of 141 (60.3%) patients were given appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (combination therapy in 38 and monotherapy in 103). Among 183 patients (78.2%) who finally received appropriate targeted treatment, 42 had combination therapy and 141 had monotherapy. The percentage of patients receiving empirical combination therapy was slightly, but not significantly higher, in the survivor group than in the nonsurvivor group (17.0% [31/182] vs. 13.5% [7/52], p = 0.74). A similar tendency was demonstrated for targeted combination therapy (19.8% [36/182] vs. 11.5% [6/52], respectively; p = 0.31). However, in a subgroup analysis of data from patients (n = 54) with an absolute neutrophil count less than 500/mm3, the patients who had appropriate empirical or targeted combination therapy showed better outcomes than those who underwent monotherapy or inappropriate therapy (p < 0.05). Mechanical ventilation (odds ratio [OR], 6.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.64-18.11; p = 0.0001), the use of a central venous catheter (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.35-6.43; p = 0.007), a high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (OR, 4.65; 95% CI, 1.95-11.04; p = 0.0001), and presence of septic shock (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.33-6.38; p = 0.007) were independent risk factors for 14-day mortality.
Disease severity was a critical factor for mortality in our patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia. Overall, combination therapy had no significant effect on 14-day mortality compared with monotherapy. However, appropriate combination therapy showed a favorable effect on survival in patients with febrile neutropenia.
抗菌治疗的联合使用是否为铜绿假单胞菌血症患者死亡率的影响因素仍有待阐明。本研究调查了铜绿假单胞菌血症患者的死亡危险因素以及充分抗菌治疗和联合治疗对临床结局的影响。
这项回顾性研究分析了2010年1月至2012年12月期间韩国一家拥有1200张床位的三级教学大学医院收治的234例铜绿假单胞菌血症患者的数据。确定了与死亡率相关的因素。比较了接受充分经验性和靶向联合治疗、单药治疗以及不恰当治疗的患者的死亡率。
共有141例(60.3%)患者接受了适当的经验性抗生素治疗(38例接受联合治疗,103例接受单药治疗)。在最终接受适当靶向治疗的183例患者(78.2%)中,42例接受联合治疗,141例接受单药治疗。幸存者组接受经验性联合治疗的患者百分比略高于非幸存者组,但差异无统计学意义(17.0%[31/182]对13.5%[7/52],p = 0.74)。靶向联合治疗也呈现类似趋势(分别为19.8%[36/182]对11.5%[6/52];p = 0.31)。然而,在对绝对中性粒细胞计数低于500/mm³的患者(n = 54)的数据进行亚组分析时,接受适当经验性或靶向联合治疗的患者比接受单药治疗或不恰当治疗的患者结局更好(p < 0.05)。机械通气(比值比[OR],6.93;95%置信区间[CI],2.64 - 18.11;p = 0.0001)、使用中心静脉导管(OR,2.95;95%CI,1.35 - 6.43;p = 0.007)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II(APACHE II)高分(OR,4.65;95%CI,1.95 - 11.04;p = 0.0001)以及存在感染性休克(OR,2.91;95%CI,1.33 - 6.38;p = 0.007)是14天死亡率的独立危险因素。
疾病严重程度是我们研究的铜绿假单胞菌血症患者死亡率的关键因素。总体而言,与单药治疗相比,联合治疗对14天死亡率无显著影响。然而,适当的联合治疗对发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的生存显示出有利影响