Suppr超能文献

60岁及以上活体肾供者的长期安全性。

Long-term safety of living kidney donors aged 60 and older.

作者信息

Toyoda M, Yamanaga S, Kawabata C, Hidaka Y, Inadome A, Arakane F, Uekihara S, Seishi I

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto City, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto City, Japan.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2014;46(2):318-20. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.11.019.

Abstract

In Japan, kidney transplantation procedures are usually dependent upon live donors. As the recipient ages have been increasing, so has there been a corollary increase in the age of the live donors. Despite this being controversial, the use of older donors is becoming increasingly common. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the long-term safety of accepting older living kidney donors and graft survival rates. We retrospectively analyzed long-term donor outcomes for consecutive patients at our institution between January 1990 and December 2011. Older live kidney donors were defined as ≥ 60 years and younger live kidney donors were defined as <60 years old. Thirty-three were ≥ 60 years and 55 donors were <60 years. The mean follow-up term was 7 years and 4 months. Predonation, older donors had a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) level (77.1 ± 9.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) than younger donors (85.8 ± 14.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P < .01). More older donors had a history of hypertension (42.4% vs 9.1%; P < .01). In both groups, eGFR levels decreased about 40% immediately after nephrectomy. Residual renal function though was stable on long-term follow-up. The incidence of de novo hypertension and proteinuria after nephrectomy was not different between the 2 groups. In older donors, there were no perioperative complications that required extended hospital stays. Graft survival over a period of 10 years was similar in both groups. In our study, donor age had no influence on the deterioration of renal function after nephrectomy. Regardless of age, careful evaluation and follow-up are important for the donor's long-term safety after donation.

摘要

在日本,肾移植手术通常依赖活体供体。随着受者年龄不断增加,活体供体的年龄也相应上升。尽管这存在争议,但使用年龄较大的供体正变得越来越普遍。我们研究的目的是评估接受年龄较大的活体肾供体的长期安全性及移植肾存活率。我们回顾性分析了1990年1月至2011年12月期间我们机构连续患者的长期供体结局。年龄较大的活体肾供体定义为≥60岁,年龄较小的活体肾供体定义为<60岁。33名供体≥60岁,55名供体<60岁。平均随访期为7年4个月。捐献前,年龄较大的供体估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)水平(77.1±9.5 mL/min/1.73 m²)低于年龄较小的供体(85.8±14.6 mL/min/1.73 m²;P<.01)。更多年龄较大的供体有高血压病史(42.4%对9.1%;P<.01)。两组中,肾切除术后eGFR水平立即下降约40%。不过,长期随访时残余肾功能稳定。两组肾切除术后新发高血压和蛋白尿的发生率无差异。在年龄较大的供体中,没有需要延长住院时间的围手术期并发症。两组10年期间的移植肾存活率相似。在我们的研究中,供体年龄对肾切除术后肾功能恶化没有影响。无论年龄如何,仔细评估和随访对于供体捐献后的长期安全都很重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验