Song Ji Yeon, Lee Kyo Won, Kim Kyunga, Kim Kyeong Deok, Yang Jaehun, Kwon Ji Eun, Lee Okjoo, Park Jae Berm
Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Biomedical Statistics Center, Data Science Research Institute, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Transplant. 2021 Dec 31;35(4):238-246. doi: 10.4285/kjt.21.0020.
As a solution to organ shortages, studies on kidney transplantation (KT) from older donors are being conducted. However, many controversies remain about its safety and efficacy.
In Samsung Medical Center, from January 2000 to May 2015, 1,141 patients underwent living KT. Cases of retransplantation, recipient and donor aged younger than 18 years, and multiorgan transplantation were excluded, and a total of 859 cases were selected. Analysis was performed by dividing the patents into two groups a younger donor group (donors <60 years old; n=826) and an older donor group (donors ≥60 years old; n=33).
There were no significant differences between the two groups in patient death (log-rank P=0.173) or in postoperative complications. The older donor group had a higher acute rejection (P=0.034; hazard ratio [HR], 1.704) and graft failure rate (P=0.029, HR=2.352). There was no significant difference in the trend of estimated glomerular filtration rate over time (P=0.189).
KT using kidneys from old-aged donors is safe, but there is room for improvement due to problems with higher acute rejection and graft failure rate.
作为解决器官短缺问题的一种方法,关于老年供体肾移植(KT)的研究正在进行。然而,关于其安全性和有效性仍存在许多争议。
在三星医疗中心,2000年1月至2015年5月期间,1141例患者接受了活体肾移植。排除再次移植、受体和供体年龄小于18岁以及多器官移植的病例,共选择了859例病例。将患者分为两组进行分析,即年轻供体组(供体<60岁;n = 826)和老年供体组(供体≥60岁;n = 33)。
两组在患者死亡(对数秩检验P = 0.173)或术后并发症方面无显著差异。老年供体组的急性排斥反应发生率更高(P = 0.034;风险比[HR],1.704),移植失败率也更高(P = 0.029,HR = 2.352)。随着时间推移,估计肾小球滤过率的变化趋势无显著差异(P = 0.189)。
使用老年供体肾脏进行肾移植是安全的,但由于急性排斥反应较高和移植失败率问题,仍有改进空间。