• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生的学习方法与小组作业之间的相互关系。

The interrelationships between student approaches to learning and group work.

作者信息

Beccaria Lisa, Kek Megan, Huijser Henk, Rose Jayln, Kimmins Lindy

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southern Queensland, West Street, Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia.

Learning and Teaching Support, University of Southern Queensland, West Street, Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jul;34(7):1094-103. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.02.006
PMID:24656223
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

As part of the process of nursing students becoming 'work ready' within future health care teams, students need the skills to work collaboratively. In higher education, establishing group work assignments is a teaching method to develop group work skills. Not only is group work an important teaching method to develop effective group work skills but it is also used to activate deep learning. However, to date, there has been a lack of research on the impact of group work on student approaches to learning. This study aimed to examine the interrelationships between students, group work characteristics, and their approaches to learning.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

A survey design was used, before and after a targeted academic skills development intervention, which had a specific focus on the development of group work skills. The sample involved first year undergraduate nursing students undertaking a Bachelor of Nursing programme at a regional university in Australia. A total of 92 students completed the pre-survey, and 102 students completed the post-survey.

METHOD

Data were collected using quantitative surveys.

RESULTS

Metacognitive awareness was found to best predict a deep approach to learning. Young age and experiencing discomfort in group work were two predictors of a surface approach to learning.

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate that nurse educators should develop strategies that support students' metacognitive awareness in relation to group work, and also support those students who feel less comfortable in working with others.

摘要

背景与目的

作为护理专业学生在未来医疗团队中“做好工作准备”过程的一部分,学生需要具备团队协作技能。在高等教育中,布置小组作业是培养团队协作技能的一种教学方法。小组作业不仅是培养有效团队协作技能的重要教学方法,还用于激发深度学习。然而,迄今为止,关于小组作业对学生学习方法的影响缺乏相关研究。本研究旨在探讨学生、小组作业特征及其学习方法之间的相互关系。

设计与参与者

采用调查设计,在一项有针对性的学术技能发展干预之前和之后进行,该干预特别关注团队协作技能的发展。样本包括在澳大利亚一所地区性大学攻读护理学学士学位的一年级本科护理学生。共有92名学生完成了预调查,102名学生完成了后调查。

方法

使用定量调查收集数据。

结果

发现元认知意识最能预测深度学习方法。年龄较小以及在小组作业中感到不适是表面学习方法的两个预测因素。

结论

研究结果表明,护理教育工作者应制定策略,支持学生在小组作业方面的元认知意识,并支持那些在与他人合作时感觉不太自在的学生。

相似文献

1
The interrelationships between student approaches to learning and group work.学生的学习方法与小组作业之间的相互关系。
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jul;34(7):1094-103. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
2
Midwifery students' evaluation of team-based academic assignments involving peer-marking.助产士学生对涉及同伴评分的基于团队的学术作业的评价。
Women Birth. 2014 Mar;27(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
3
Nursing and midwifery students' approaches to study and learning.护理与助产专业学生的学习方法与途径。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 May;54(3):351-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03814.x.
4
Understanding nursing students' perspectives on the grading of group work assessments.理解护理专业学生对小组作业评估评分的看法。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2014 Mar;14(2):112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
5
Nursing students' perspectives of the health and healthcare issues of Australian Indigenous people.护理专业学生对澳大利亚原住民健康与医疗问题的看法。
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Mar;35(3):461-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.019. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
6
EN to RN: the transition experience pre- and post-graduation.从护理学学士到注册护士:毕业前后的过渡经历。
Rural Remote Health. 2006 Jan-Mar;6(1):363. Epub 2006 Mar 6.
7
Learning approaches as predictors of academic performance in first year health and science students.学习方法作为一年级健康与科学专业学生学业成绩的预测指标
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Jul;33(7):729-33. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.01.013. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
8
The development of a rubric for peer assessment of individual teamwork skills in undergraduate midwifery students.制定一个用于评估本科助产学生个体团队合作技能的同侪评估表。
Women Birth. 2014 Sep;27(3):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
9
Promoting student learning and increasing organizational capacity to host students in residential aged care: a mixed method research study.促进学生学习并提高住宿型老年护理机构接收学生的组织能力:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Jul;33(7):714-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.017. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
10
Identifying strategies to assist final semester nursing students to develop numeracy skills: a mixed methods study.确定帮助护理学专业最后一学期学生培养计算能力的策略:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Mar;34(3):405-12. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.03.017. Epub 2013 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparison of Study Behaviors and Metacognitive Evaluation Used by Biology Students.生物学专业学生学习行为和元认知评价的比较
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Dec;22(4):ar36. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-11-0225.
2
Investigating the learning approaches of students in nursing education.探究护理教育中学生的学习方法。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 Nov 10;16(1):43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.10.008. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
Associations between learning environment variables and students' approaches to studying: a cross-sectional study.
学习环境变量与学生学习方法之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 20;20(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02033-4.
4
Deep, Surface, or Both? A Study of Occupational Therapy Students' Learning Concepts.深入、表面还是两者兼顾?一项关于职业治疗专业学生学习观念的研究。
Occup Ther Int. 2018 Aug 7;2018:3439815. doi: 10.1155/2018/3439815. eCollection 2018.
5
Approaches to studying predict academic performance in undergraduate occupational therapy students: a cross-cultural study.研究方法对本科职业治疗专业学生学业成绩的预测作用:一项跨文化研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 May 2;17(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0914-3.