Suppr超能文献

基底节、丘脑和脑岛深部动静脉畸形:显微外科治疗、技术和结果。

Deep arteriovenous malformations in the Basal Ganglia, thalamus, and insula: microsurgical management, techniques, and results.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0112, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2013 Sep;73(3):417-29. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and insula are considered inoperable given their depth, eloquence, and limited surgical exposure. Although many neurosurgeons opt for radiosurgery or observation, others have challenged the belief that deep AVMs are inoperable. Further discussion of patient selection, technique, and multimodality management is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To describe and discuss the technical considerations of microsurgical resection for deep-seated AVMs.

METHODS

Patients with deep AVMs who underwent surgery during a 14-year period were reviewed through the use of a prospective AVM registry.

RESULTS

Microsurgery was performed in 48 patients with AVMs in the basal ganglia (n=10), thalamus (n=13), or insula (n=25). The most common Spetzler-Martin grade was III- (68%). Surgical approaches included transsylvian (67%), transcallosal (19%), and transcortical (15%). Complete resection was achieved in 34 patients (71%), and patients with incomplete resection were treated with radiosurgery. Forty-five patients (94%) were improved or unchanged (mean follow-up, 1.6 years).

CONCLUSION

This experience advances the notion that select deep AVMs may be operable lesions. Patients were highly selected for small size, hemorrhagic presentation, young age, and compactness-factors embodied in the Spetzler-Martin and Supplementary grading systems. Overall, 10 different approaches were used, exploiting direct, transcortical corridors created by hemorrhage or maximizing anatomic corridors through subarachnoid spaces and ventricles that minimize brain transgression. The same cautious attitude exercised in selecting patients for surgery was also exercised in deciding extent of resection, opting for incomplete resection and radiosurgery more than with other AVMs to prioritize neurological outcomes.

摘要

背景

由于基底节、丘脑和脑岛动静脉畸形(AVM)位置深在、毗邻重要功能区,手术显露范围有限,因此被认为无法手术切除。尽管许多神经外科医生选择放射治疗或观察,但也有其他医生质疑深部 AVM 无法手术的观点。需要进一步讨论患者选择、技术和多模态管理。

目的

描述并讨论深部 AVM 显微切除的技术要点。

方法

通过前瞻性 AVM 登记系统,回顾了 14 年间接受手术治疗的深部 AVM 患者。

结果

48 例 AVM 患者接受了手术治疗,AVM 位于基底节(n=10)、丘脑(n=13)或脑岛(n=25)。最常见的 Spetzler-Martin 分级为 III 级(68%)。手术入路包括经外侧裂(67%)、胼胝体间(19%)和皮质造瘘(15%)。34 例患者(71%)达到了完全切除,未完全切除的患者接受了放射治疗。45 例患者(94%)得到改善或保持不变(平均随访时间 1.6 年)。

结论

本研究进一步证实,某些特定的深部 AVM 可能是可切除病变。患者经过严格选择,具有体积小、出血表现、年轻和致密等特点,这些特点体现在 Spetzler-Martin 和补充分级系统中。总体上,我们采用了 10 种不同的手术入路,利用出血引起的直接皮质通道或通过蛛网膜下腔和脑室最大限度地扩大解剖通道,以最小的脑侵犯来实现肿瘤的最大切除。在为手术选择患者时所采取的谨慎态度,也体现在决定切除范围上,与其他 AVM 相比,我们更倾向于选择不完全切除和放射治疗,以优先考虑神经功能结局。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
Microsurgical Treatment of Deep and Eloquent AVMs.深部及功能区脑动静脉畸形的显微外科治疗。
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2022;44:17-53. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-87649-4_2.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验