Suppr超能文献

标准化方案有助于实现中风识别和颈动脉狭窄的早期治疗。

Standardized protocols enable stroke recognition and early treatment of carotid stenosis.

作者信息

Paty Philip S K, Bernardini Gary L, Mehta Manish, Feustel Paul J, Desai Khusboo, Roddy Sean P, Darling R Clement

机构信息

The Institute for Vascular Health and Disease, Albany Medical College/Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY.

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jul;60(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.047. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the effect of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) care coordination between vascular surgery and stroke neurology services with primary focus on acute patient stabilization and expeditious carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

A standardized AIS protocol was instituted between vascular surgery and stroke neurology services in an academic hospital (group I) that included: (1) rapid patient evaluation and imaging inclusive of brain and carotid computed tomography/magnetic resonance angiography, carotid duplex ultrasound imaging or conventional arteriogram, or both; (2) patient admission to a dedicated stroke unit with minimum 1:2 intensive care nurse-to-patient staffing and a 24-hour available neurointensivist; (3) treatment of all patients with ipsilateral moderate or severe carotid stenosis by CEA with cervical block (158 [81%]) or general anesthesia (38 [19%]). Patient exclusion from undergoing expeditious CEA included (1) stroke in evolution, and (2) dense neurologic deficit or National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >15 (severe), or both. Comparisons of data were performed between group I patients and those treated in outlying hospitals (group II) for similar indications. All data were prospectively collected in a computerized database and outcomes evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

From November 2002 to November 2012, 369 patients underwent CEA for AIS ≤1 week of presentation. There were 192 patients in group I and 177 in group II. There were no differences in group I and II in mean stroke-to-CEA interval (3.4 vs 3.9 days) or in the performance of eversion CEA (94% vs 97%), respectively. Intraoperative shunt use was greater in group I (28%) than in group II (18%; P = .021). Fewer total neurologic events (stroke or transient ischemic attack) occurred in group I (6 [3.1%] vs 14 [7.3%]; P = .03). No patients died in either group. Postoperative National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores available in group I patients showed improvement from preoperative baseline in mild and moderate stroke patients (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable acute stroke, early CEA is feasible and relatively safe. Stroke or death occurs in only 1%, and most complications are of nonfatal cardiac origin. A standardized stroke team protocol that is inclusive of stroke neurologists and vascular surgeons allows for expeditious and safe CEA in the setting of an acute stroke.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨血管外科与卒中神经内科服务之间急性缺血性卒中(AIS)护理协调的效果,主要关注急性患者的稳定和快速颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)。

方法

在一家学术医院的血管外科与卒中神经内科服务之间制定了标准化的AIS方案(第一组),包括:(1)对患者进行快速评估和成像,包括脑部和颈动脉计算机断层扫描/磁共振血管造影、颈动脉双功超声成像或传统动脉造影,或两者兼用;(2)将患者收入专门的卒中单元,重症监护护士与患者的配备比例至少为1:2,并有一名24小时值班的神经重症专家;(3)对所有同侧中度或重度颈动脉狭窄患者采用CEA治疗,采用颈部阻滞(158例[81%])或全身麻醉(38例[19%])。排除接受快速CEA的患者包括:(1)进展性卒中,以及(2)严重神经功能缺损或美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分>15(重度),或两者兼有。对第一组患者与在偏远医院接受治疗的患者(第二组)的类似指征数据进行比较。所有数据均前瞻性收集到计算机数据库中,并对结果进行回顾性评估。

结果

2002年11月至2012年11月,369例患者因AIS发病≤1周接受了CEA。第一组有192例患者,第二组有177例。第一组和第二组的平均卒中至CEA间隔(3.4天对3.9天)或外翻CEA的实施情况(94%对97%)分别无差异。第一组术中分流的使用(28%)高于第二组(18%;P = 0.021)。第一组发生的总神经事件(卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作)较少(6例[3.1%]对14例[7.3%];P = 0.03)。两组均无患者死亡。第一组患者术后美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分显示,轻度和中度卒中患者较术前基线有所改善(P < 0.001)。

结论

在急性卒中稳定的患者中,早期CEA是可行且相对安全的。卒中或死亡仅发生在1%的患者中,且大多数并发症为非致命性心脏源性。包括卒中神经科医生和血管外科医生的标准化卒中团队方案允许在急性卒中情况下进行快速且安全的CEA。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验