Klocker Josef, Koell Anna, Erlmeier Maximilian, Goebel Georg, Jaschke Werner, Fraedrich Gustav
Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jul;60(1):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.060. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
The objective of this study was to report on the incidence of left arm ischemia, left arm function, and quality of life after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) by stent grafting with and without coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA).
All patients who underwent TEVAR since 1996 in our institution were included. Basic demographic parameters, underlying disease, details of TEVAR, long-term left arm function (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH] questionnaire), and quality of life (12-Item Short Form Health Survey) were analyzed. End points were left arm ischemia, need for LSA revascularization (before or after TEVAR), long-term functional impairment, and quality of life.
A total of 138 patients underwent TEVAR for degenerative aneurysm (n = 64), traumatic aortic injury (TAI; n = 38), or Stanford type B dissection (n = 36). Seventy-three patients (52.9%) had LSA coverage, which led to partial or complete LSA occlusion in 49 (35.5%). Selectively, nine patients (6.5%) had primary LSA revascularization. After TEVAR, left arm ischemia was observed in only one patient, who consecutively needed a left carotid to subclavian bypass. During a mean follow-up period of 4.1 ± 3.7 years, no additional patient needed secondary LSA revascularization. In comparing patients with occluded vs patent LSA, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) health scores (12-Item Short Form Health Survey) as well as DASH scores were similar. However, subgroup analysis showed better PCS scores for TAI patients with patent LSA, whereas MCS and DASH scores were similar in TAI patients, and scores were indifferent within thoracic aortic aneurysm and Stanford type B dissection subgroups. In comparing different subgroups, TAI patients had significantly better PCS, MCS, and DASH scores.
TEVAR is associated with a low risk of peri-interventional left arm ischemia. During long-term follow-up, secondary LSA revascularization is uncommon. Coverage of the LSA has no impact on left arm function and quality of life, probably with the exception of physical health scores in patients with TAI.
本研究的目的是报告在有或没有覆盖左锁骨下动脉(LSA)的情况下,通过支架植入术进行胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)后左臂缺血的发生率、左臂功能和生活质量。
纳入自1996年以来在本机构接受TEVAR的所有患者。分析基本人口统计学参数、基础疾病、TEVAR的详细情况、长期左臂功能(手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍[DASH]问卷)以及生活质量(12项简短健康调查)。终点指标为左臂缺血、LSA血运重建的必要性(TEVAR之前或之后)、长期功能损害和生活质量。
共有138例患者因退行性动脉瘤(n = 64)、创伤性主动脉损伤(TAI;n = 38)或斯坦福B型夹层(n = 36)接受TEVAR。73例患者(52.9%)进行了LSA覆盖,其中49例(35.5%)导致LSA部分或完全闭塞。选择性地,9例患者(6.5%)进行了原发性LSA血运重建。TEVAR后,仅1例患者出现左臂缺血,该患者随后需要进行左颈动脉至锁骨下动脉旁路移植术。在平均4.1±3.7年的随访期内,没有其他患者需要进行二次LSA血运重建。在比较LSA闭塞与通畅的患者时,身体成分总结(PCS)和精神成分总结(MCS)健康评分(12项简短健康调查)以及DASH评分相似。然而,亚组分析显示,LSA通畅的TAI患者的PCS评分更好,而TAI患者的MCS和DASH评分相似,在胸主动脉瘤和斯坦福B型夹层亚组中评分无差异。在比较不同亚组时,TAI患者的PCS、MCS和DASH评分明显更好。
TEVAR与围手术期左臂缺血的低风险相关。在长期随访中,二次LSA血运重建并不常见。LSA的覆盖对左臂功能和生活质量没有影响,可能TAI患者的身体健康评分除外。