Medical Oncology Unit; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine; Magna Græcia University and T. Campanella Cancer Center; Catanzaro, Italy.
Department of Biochemistry; Biophysics and General Pathology; Second University of Naples; Naples, Italy.
Cancer Biol Ther. 2014 Jun 1;15(6):707-20. doi: 10.4161/cbt.28557. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecological tumors. Carboplatin/paclitaxel represents the cornerstone of front-line treatment. Instead, there is no consensus for management of recurrent/progressive disease, in which pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) ± carboplatin is widely used. We performed a systematic review and metaanalysis to evaluate impact of PLD-based compared with no-PLD-based regimens in the ovarian cancer treatment. Data were extracted from randomized trials comparing PLD-based treatment to any other regimens in the January 2000-January 2013 time-frame. Study end-points were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), CA125 response, and toxicity. Hazard ratios (HRs) of OS and PFS, with 95% CI, odds ratios (ORs) of RR and risk ratios of CA125 response and grade 3-4 toxicity, were extracted. Data were pooled using fixed and random effect models for selected endpoints. Fourteen randomized trials for a total of 5760 patients were selected and included for the final analysis, which showed no OS differences for PLD-based compared with other regimens (pooled HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.88-1.02; P = 0.132) and a significant PFS benefit of PLD-based schedule (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.86-0.96; P = 0.001), particularly in second-line (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.75-0.91) and in platinum-sensitive (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.74-0.94) subgroups. This work confirmed the peculiar tolerability profile of this drug, moreover no difference was observed for common hematological toxicities and for RR, CA125 response. PLD-containing regimens do not improve OS when compared with any other schedule in all phases of disease. A marginal PFS advantage is observed only in platinum-sensitive setting and second-line treatment.
卵巢癌是妇科肿瘤死亡的主要原因。卡铂/紫杉醇是一线治疗的基石。然而,对于复发性/进展性疾病的治疗尚无共识,广泛使用的是多柔比星脂质体(PLD)±卡铂。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估 PLD 为基础的方案与卵巢癌治疗中无 PLD 为基础的方案相比的影响。数据从 2000 年 1 月至 2013 年 1 月期间比较 PLD 为基础的治疗与任何其他方案的随机试验中提取。研究终点是总生存(OS)、无进展生存(PFS)、反应率(RR)、CA125 反应和毒性。提取 OS 和 PFS 的风险比(HRs),并带有 95%置信区间(CI),RR 和 CA125 反应及 3-4 级毒性的比值比(ORs)。使用固定和随机效应模型对选定的终点进行数据汇总。选择了 14 项随机试验,共 5760 例患者,最终进行了分析,结果显示,与其他方案相比,PLD 为基础的方案与 OS 无差异(合并 HR:0.94;95%CI:0.88-1.02;P=0.132),而 PLD 为基础的方案在 PFS 方面有显著获益(HR:0.91;95%CI:0.86-0.96;P=0.001),尤其是在二线(HR:0.85;95%CI:0.75-0.91)和铂敏感(HR:0.83;95%CI:0.74-0.94)亚组中。这项工作证实了该药物独特的耐受性特征,此外,在常见的血液学毒性和 RR、CA125 反应方面,没有观察到差异。与任何其他方案相比,PLD 为基础的方案在疾病的所有阶段均不能改善 OS。仅在铂敏感环境和二线治疗中观察到 PFS 略有优势。