• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮椎体成形术,一种用于椎间盘减压的微创手术:已发表临床研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Nucleoplasty, a minimally invasive procedure for disc decompression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical studies.

作者信息

Eichen Philipp Maximilian, Achilles Nils, Konig Volker, Mosges Ralph, Hellmich Martin, Himpe Bastian, Kirchner Rainer

机构信息

Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMSIE), University Hospital of Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2014 Mar-Apr;17(2):E149-73.

PMID:24658486
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nucleoplasty, based on Coblation® technology, is a minimally invasive procedure used to decompress herniated discs. Reviews to date--exclusively systematic reviews--recommend nucleoplasty for treating chronic back pain, although with the restriction of limited to fair evidence. We therefore aimed to summarize and interpret our calculated results, where possible comprehensively and quantitatively, using statistical methods in the context of a meta-analysis supplementing a systematic review. In the process, the central question was to statistically determine whether, and to what extent, nucleoplasty can positively affect pain relief and functional mobility as well as lower the complication rate.

OBJECTIVE

Newly published studies made it possible to conduct a meta-analysis of the visual analog scale (VAS), a measuring instrument used to determine pain intensity, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a scale that reflects the degree of impairment in percent. In addition to having clearly sound evidence for analyzing VAS/NPS data, the present, newly compiled meta-analysis was able to summarize VAS and ODI data quantitatively and to calculate a total complication rate for the first time. It was thereby possible to make a first comparison between nucleoplasty and conservative therapy (including epidural steroid injection).

STUDY DESIGN

This meta-analysis examined all study data published in clinical trials involving the nucleoplasty procedure for plasma disc decompression.

METHODS

A systematic search using the terms nucleoplasty and/or plasma disc decompression was conducted for literature listed in MEDLINE. Twenty-seven eligible studies (22 prospective trials and 5 retrospective trials) were included, and pooled analyses as well as various subgroup analyses (differentiation between cervical and lumbar disc herniations, comparisons with alternative treatments such as epidural steroid injection) were performed based on their data.

RESULTS

Pain decreased from a baseline VAS value of 7.27 to 2.12 (postop/first day), 2.50 (one week), 2.70 (2 weeks), 3.23 (one month), 2.66 (6 weeks), 2.84 (3 months), 3.06 (6 months), 3.03 (12 months), 1.54 (18 months), and 3.69 (24 months) after nucleoplasty. The ODI value (baseline: 58.95) dropped to 28.60 (one week), 29.00 (2 weeks), 23.21 (one month), 30.00 (6 weeks), 18.30 (3 months), 22.54 (6 months), 24.43 (12 months), 12.82 (18 months), and 36.98 (24 months). Compared to baseline, significant pain reduction and improvement in functional mobility after nucleoplasty were observed at every time point. Nucleoplasty showed a total complication rate of 1.5%, with the individual rates being 0.8% for cervical and 1.8% for lumbar nucleoplasty. Nucleoplasty was superior to conservative therapy at every time point and for all 3 included parameters, at some measurement time points even significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Nucleoplasty reduces pain in the long term and improves patients' functional mobility. It is an effective, low-complication, minimally invasive procedure used to treat disc herniations.

摘要

背景

基于低温等离子消融(Coblation®)技术的髓核成形术是一种用于减轻椎间盘突出症压迫的微创手术。迄今为止的综述——均为系统综述——推荐髓核成形术用于治疗慢性背痛,尽管证据有限。因此,我们旨在通过荟萃分析补充系统综述,尽可能全面和定量地总结并解释我们计算得出的结果,在此过程中,核心问题是从统计学角度确定髓核成形术是否以及在何种程度上能够对缓解疼痛、改善功能活动能力产生积极影响,并降低并发症发生率。

目的

新发表的研究使得对视觉模拟量表(VAS,一种用于确定疼痛强度的测量工具)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI,一种以百分比反映功能障碍程度的量表)进行荟萃分析成为可能。除了拥有用于分析VAS/NPS数据的明确可靠证据外,本次新编制的荟萃分析能够定量总结VAS和ODI数据,并首次计算出总并发症发生率。从而能够首次对髓核成形术与保守治疗(包括硬膜外类固醇注射)进行比较。

研究设计

本荟萃分析检查了所有发表在涉及等离子椎间盘减压髓核成形术临床试验中的研究数据。

方法

使用“髓核成形术”和/或 “等离子椎间盘减压” 等术语对MEDLINE中列出的文献进行系统检索。纳入了27项符合条件的研究(22项前瞻性试验和5项回顾性试验),并根据其数据进行汇总分析以及各种亚组分析(区分颈椎和腰椎间盘突出症,与硬膜外类固醇注射等替代治疗方法进行比较)。

结果

髓核成形术后,疼痛从基线VAS值7.27降至术后/第一天的2.12、一周后的2.50、两周后的2.70、一个月后的3.23、六周后的2.66、三个月后的2.84、六个月后的3.06、十二个月后的3.03、十八个月后的1.54以及二十四个月后的3.69。ODI值(基线:58.95)降至一周后的28.60、两周后的29.00、一个月后的23.21、六周后的30.00、三个月后的18.30、六个月后的22.54、十二个月后的24.43、十八个月后的12.82以及二十四个月后的36.98。与基线相比,在每个时间点均观察到髓核成形术后疼痛显著减轻且功能活动能力得到改善。髓核成形术的总并发症发生率为1.5%,其中颈椎髓核成形术的发生率为0.8%,腰椎髓核成形术的发生率为1.8%。在每个时间点以及所有三个纳入参数方面,髓核成形术均优于保守治疗,在某些测量时间点甚至具有显著优势。

结论

髓核成形术可长期减轻疼痛并改善患者的功能活动能力。它是一种用于治疗椎间盘突出症的有效且低并发症的微创手术。

相似文献

1
Nucleoplasty, a minimally invasive procedure for disc decompression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical studies.经皮椎体成形术,一种用于椎间盘减压的微创手术:已发表临床研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2014 Mar-Apr;17(2):E149-73.
2
A systematic review on the effectiveness of the Nucleoplasty procedure for discogenic pain.经皮髓核成形术治疗椎间盘源性疼痛的有效性的系统评价。
Pain Physician. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):117-32.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
A systematic review of mechanical lumbar disc decompression with nucleoplasty.经皮髓核成形术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价
Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):561-72.
5
An update of the systematic assessment of mechanical lumbar disc decompression with nucleoplasty.经皮机械腰椎间盘减压成形术的系统评价更新。
Pain Physician. 2013 Apr;16(2 Suppl):SE25-54.
6
Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Provide Better Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Than Open Surgery in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.微创外科治疗拇外翻畸形是否优于开放手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jun 1;481(6):1143-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002471. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
Rehabilitation following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症手术后的康复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 9;2013(12):CD009644. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009644.pub2.
9
Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗选择
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD012421. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012421.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and radiological comparison of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty combined with ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of cervical nerve root for cervical radicular pain: a retrospective, matched-cohort study.经皮颈椎间盘髓核成形术联合超声引导下颈神经根脉冲射频治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床及影像学比较:一项回顾性匹配队列研究
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 23;6:1618608. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1618608. eCollection 2025.
2
14. Discogenic Low Back Pain.14. 椎间盘源性下腰痛。
Pain Pract. 2025 Sep;25(7):e70062. doi: 10.1111/papr.70062.
3
Application value of Ultrasound-Guided cervical nerve root block test before percutaneous nucleoplasty in the treatment of patients with cervical chest pain: A retrospective study.
超声引导下经皮核成形术前颈神经根阻滞试验在颈胸段疼痛患者治疗中的应用价值:一项回顾性研究
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jun 14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08996-6.
4
The effect of posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy vs. percutaneous nucleoplasty in patients with cervical radicular pain due to a single-level contained soft-disc herniation: a retrospective cohort study.后路经皮内镜下颈椎间盘切除术与经皮髓核成形术治疗单节段软性椎间盘突出所致颈神经根性疼痛患者的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03047-5.
5
Which Kind of Prognosis is Better in the Treatment of Cervical and Lumbar Disc Herniation with Coblation Nucleoplasty?使用低温等离子体髓核成形术治疗颈椎和腰椎间盘突出症时哪种预后更好?
J Pain Res. 2025 Feb 20;18:817-826. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S500287. eCollection 2025.
6
Percutaneous nucleoplasty and intradiscal electrothermal therapy in the management of lumbar discogenic pain: A retrospective comparative study.经皮髓核成形术和椎间盘内电热疗法治疗腰椎间盘源性疼痛:回顾性对比研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 9;103(32):e39230. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039230.
7
Non-Surgical Approaches to the Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation Associated with Radiculopathy: A Narrative Review.腰椎间盘突出症伴神经根病的非手术治疗方法:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 8;13(4):974. doi: 10.3390/jcm13040974.
8
An Analysis of the Clinical and Radiological Prognostic Factors Affecting the Outcomes of Lumbar Intradiscal Biacuplasty.腰椎间盘内双极成形术疗效的临床和影像学预后因素分析。
Int J Med Sci. 2023 Jul 9;20(8):1115-1122. doi: 10.7150/ijms.85777. eCollection 2023.
9
Machine Learning Assisting the Prediction of Clinical Outcomes following Nucleoplasty for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.机器学习辅助预测腰椎间盘退变疾病髓核成形术后的临床结果
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 26;13(11):1863. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111863.
10
Analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty: A case-control study.经皮颈椎间盘髓核成形术的临床和影像学结果分析:一项病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 12;17(12):e0278883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278883. eCollection 2022.