• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西机器人辅助与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖症的发病率、体重减轻及相对成本比较

Comparison of the morbidity, weight loss, and relative costs between robotic and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of obesity in Brazil.

作者信息

Schraibman Vladimir, Macedo Antonio L V, Epstein Marina G, Soares Mayte Y, Maccapani Gabriel, Matos Delcio, Rizzo Luiz Vicente, Goldman Suzan M

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2014 Sep;24(9):1420-4. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1239-5.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-014-1239-5
PMID:24658977
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, there has been renewed interest in using robotics in bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity. However, the high cost of a robotic surgical system has hindered its widespread use in developing countries. This study aims to compare the rate of morbidity, weight loss, and relative costs between laparoscopic (LSG) and robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) performed for the treatment of obesity in a single center in Brazil.

METHODS

From January 2011 to March 2013, 48 severely obese patients underwent either LSG or RSG at our institution and were prospectively followed up for 12 months. Patients were free to choose either approach and were informed of any extra costs that may be incurred.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients underwent LSG and 16 patients, RSG. No significant differences were observed between LSG and RSG groups regarding age, sex, BMI, incidence of comorbidities, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay. Also, there were no significant between-group differences in BMI values evaluated at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Surgical costs were almost twice as high and total hospital costs were approximately 50 % higher in the robotic approach compared to the laparoscopic approach.

CONCLUSION

Both RSG and LSG had excellent and similar post-operative clinical outcomes. However, the much higher costs of purchasing and maintaining the robotic system are still precluding the use of RSG as a routine approach in the treatment of morbid obesity in Brazil.

摘要

背景

近年来,在减重手术中使用机器人技术治疗病态肥胖症重新引起了人们的关注。然而,机器人手术系统的高昂成本阻碍了其在发展中国家的广泛应用。本研究旨在比较巴西一家单一中心进行的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)和机器人辅助袖状胃切除术(RSG)治疗肥胖症的发病率、体重减轻情况和相对成本。

方法

2011年1月至2013年3月,48例严重肥胖患者在我们机构接受了LSG或RSG手术,并进行了为期12个月的前瞻性随访。患者可自由选择任何一种手术方式,并被告知可能产生的任何额外费用。

结果

32例患者接受了LSG手术,16例患者接受了RSG手术。在年龄、性别、体重指数、合并症发生率、手术时间和住院时间方面,LSG组和RSG组之间未观察到显著差异。此外,术后6个月和12个月评估的体重指数值在组间也无显著差异。与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人手术的手术成本几乎高出一倍,总住院成本高出约50%。

结论

RSG和LSG均具有良好且相似的术后临床效果。然而,购买和维护机器人系统的成本过高,仍然阻碍了RSG在巴西作为治疗病态肥胖症的常规方法的应用。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the morbidity, weight loss, and relative costs between robotic and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of obesity in Brazil.巴西机器人辅助与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖症的发病率、体重减轻及相对成本比较
Obes Surg. 2014 Sep;24(9):1420-4. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1239-5.
2
Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Super-obese.肥胖患者行机器人与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的围手术期结局。
J Surg Res. 2020 May;249:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
3
Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Adolescents; Reality or Hype.青少年机器人与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:现实还是炒作。
Obes Surg. 2016 Aug;26(8):1912-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-2029-4.
4
Comparing the Efficacy of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较机器人与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3493-3505. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07413-z. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a MBSAQIP analysis.机器人与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:MBSAQIP 分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):917-922. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6387-6. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
6
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2017 Jan;27(1):245-253. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2444-1.
7
Hospital charges for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy compared to robotic sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter study.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与机器人袖状胃切除术的医院费用比较:一项多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5304-5309. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11058-5. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
8
A superior approach? The role of robotic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with super super obesity using the 2019-2022 MBSAQIP database.一种更优越的方法?利用 2019-2022 年 MBSAQIP 数据库评估机器人袖状胃切除术在超级肥胖患者中的作用。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4594-4603. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10955-z. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
9
Robotic sleeve gastrectomy: experience of 134 cases and comparison with a systematic review of the laparoscopic approach.机器人袖状胃切除术:134 例经验及与腹腔镜方法的系统评价比较。
Obes Surg. 2013 Nov;23(11):1743-52. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1004-1.
10
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcome Trends Over Time: Are We Improving?机器人辅助与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术随时间推移的结果趋势:我们是否在进步?
Obes Surg. 2024 Jul;34(7):2596-2606. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07334-x. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Costs of robotic and laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜减重手术的成本:系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):2784-2798. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11744-y. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Robotic vs Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with BMI > 40 kg/m (Class ≥ III Obesity): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体重指数>40kg/m²(≥Ⅲ级肥胖)患者的机器人与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Obes Surg. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07881-x.
3
Port Site Placement and Outcomes for Surgical Obesity and Metabolic Surgeries (PSPOSO) Checklist: A New Reporting Checklist Based on Evidential Assessment of the Number of Trocars and Positions.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, neuroendocrine and periampullary pancreatic tumors using robotic surgery: a safe and feasible technique.使用机器人手术治疗导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤、神经内分泌肿瘤和壶腹周围胰腺肿瘤:一种安全可行的技术。
J Robot Surg. 2011 Mar;5(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/s11701-010-0238-3. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
2
Surgical treatment of hiatus hernia and gastroesophageal reflux disease in complex cases using robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a prospective study/consistent experience in a single institution.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗复杂病例中的食管裂孔疝和胃食管反流病:一项单中心前瞻性研究/连贯经验
J Robot Surg. 2011 Mar;5(1):29-33. doi: 10.1007/s11701-010-0235-6. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
3
外科肥胖与代谢手术的切口位置与结果(PSPOSO)检查表:基于对套管针数量和位置的证据评估制定的新报告检查表
Obes Surg. 2025 Mar;35(3):1086-1108. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07694-y. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
4
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcome Trends Over Time: Are We Improving?机器人辅助与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术随时间推移的结果趋势:我们是否在进步?
Obes Surg. 2024 Jul;34(7):2596-2606. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07334-x. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
Robotic bariatric surgery for the obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人减重手术治疗肥胖症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2440-2456. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08283-z. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
6
Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.五种缝钉线加固方案在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中漏率的比较:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):396-407. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06782-2. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a MBSAQIP analysis.机器人与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:MBSAQIP 分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):917-922. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6387-6. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
8
Robotics in general surgery: A systematic cost assessment.普通外科中的机器人技术:一项系统成本评估。
J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Oct-Dec;13(4):243-255. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.195565.
9
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2017 Jan;27(1):245-253. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2444-1.
10
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜减肥手术:系统评价与荟萃分析
Obes Surg. 2016 Dec;26(12):3031-3044. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2408-5.
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity with intra-operative endoscopic guidance. Immediate peri-operative and 1-year results after 25 patients.
腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖症,术中内镜引导。25 例患者术后即刻围手术期和 1 年结果。
Obes Surg. 2010 Aug;20(8):1164-70. doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0176-1.
4
Metabolic/bariatric surgery Worldwide 2008.全球代谢/减重手术 2008 年报告
Obes Surg. 2009 Dec;19(12):1605-11. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-0014-5.
5
Sleeve gastrectomy-a "food limiting" operation.袖状胃切除术——一种“限制食物摄入”的手术。
Obes Surg. 2008 Oct;18(10):1251-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9634-4. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
6
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it?使用达芬奇机器人系统进行的Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术:值得吗?
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jul;22(7):1690-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9698-6. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
7
Sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity.袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖症。
Obes Surg. 2007 Jul;17(7):962-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9151-x.
8
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a review.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖症:综述
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Mar-Apr;3(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.10.013.
9
Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses.在腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术的学习曲线期间,机器人辅助可提供出色的手术效果:100例机器人辅助胃旁路手术的结果
Am J Surg. 2006 Dec;192(6):746-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.038.
10
Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.全机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术。
Arch Surg. 2005 Aug;140(8):779-86. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.8.779.