Suppr超能文献

视觉和数字比较牙齿颜色评估方法与原子力显微镜表面粗糙度

Visual and digital comparative tooth colour assessment methods and atomic force microscopy surface roughness.

作者信息

Grundlingh A A, Grossman E S, Shrivastava S, Witcomb M J

出版信息

SADJ. 2013 Oct;68(9):412-4, 416-21.

Abstract

This study compared digital and visual colour tooth colour assessment methods in a sample of 99 teeth consisting of incisors, canines and pre-molars. The teeth were equally divided between Control, Ozicure Oxygen Activator bleach and Opalescence Quick bleach and subjected to three treatments. Colour readings were recorded at nine intervals by two assessment methods, VITA Easyshade and VITAPAN 3D MASTER TOOTH GUIDE, giving a total of 1782 colour readings. Descriptive and statistical analysis was undertaken using a GLM test for Analysis of Variance for a Fractional Design set at a significance of P < 0.05. Atomic force micros copy was used to examine treated ename surfaces and establish surface roughness. Visual tooth colour assessment showed significance for the independent variables of treatment, number of treatments, tooth type and the combination tooth type and treatment. Digital colour assessment indicated treatment and tooth type to be of significance in tooth colour change. Poor agreement was found between visual and digital colour assessment methods for Control and Ozicure Oxygen Activator treatments. Surface roughness values increased two-fold for Opalescence Quick specimens over the two other treatments, implying that increased light scattering improved digital colour reading. Both digital and visual colour matching methods should be used in tooth bleaching studies to complement each other and to compensate for deficiencies.

摘要

本研究在由99颗包括切牙、尖牙和前磨牙的牙齿样本中比较了数字和视觉牙齿颜色评估方法。这些牙齿在对照组、Ozicure氧气活化剂漂白剂和Opalescence Quick漂白剂之间平均分配,并接受三种处理。通过两种评估方法,即VITA Easyshade和VITAPAN 3D MASTER牙齿比色板,在九个时间间隔记录颜色读数,共获得1782个颜色读数。使用GLM检验进行描述性和统计分析,该检验用于分数设计的方差分析,显著性设定为P < 0.05。使用原子力显微镜检查处理后的牙釉质表面并确定表面粗糙度。视觉牙齿颜色评估显示处理、处理次数、牙齿类型以及牙齿类型与处理的组合这些自变量具有显著性。数字颜色评估表明处理和牙齿类型在牙齿颜色变化中具有显著性。对于对照组和Ozicure氧气活化剂处理,视觉和数字颜色评估方法之间的一致性较差。与其他两种处理相比,Opalescence Quick样本的表面粗糙度值增加了两倍,这意味着光散射增加改善了数字颜色读数。在牙齿漂白研究中应同时使用数字和视觉颜色匹配方法,以相互补充并弥补不足。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验