Ding Xuanfeng, Dionisi Francesco, Tang Shikui, Ingram Mark, Hung Chun-Yu, Prionas Evangelos, Lichtenwalner Phil, Butterwick Ian, Zhai Huifang, Yin Lingshu, Lin Haibo, Kassaee Alireza, Avery Stephen
Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Med Dosim. 2014 Summer;39(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.11.005. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
With traditional photon therapy to treat large postoperative pancreatic target volume, it often leads to poor tolerance of the therapy delivered and may contribute to interrupted treatment course. This study was performed to evaluate the potential advantage of using passive-scattering (PS) and modulated-scanning (MS) proton therapy (PT) to reduce normal tissue exposure in postoperative pancreatic cancer treatment. A total of 11 patients with postoperative pancreatic cancer who had been previously treated with PS PT in University of Pennsylvania Roberts Proton Therapy Center from 2010 to 2013 were identified. The clinical target volume (CTV) includes the pancreatic tumor bed as well as the adjacent high-risk nodal areas. Internal (iCTV) was generated from 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT), taking into account target motion from breathing cycle. Three-field and 4-field 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), 5-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy, 2-arc volumetric-modulated radiation therapy, and 2-field PS and MS PT were created on the patients' average CT. All the plans delivered 50.4Gy to the planning target volume (PTV). Overall, 98% of PTV was covered by 95% of the prescription dose and 99% of iCTV received 98% prescription dose. The results show that all the proton plans offer significant lower doses to the left kidney (mean and V18Gy), stomach (mean and V20Gy), and cord (maximum dose) compared with all the photon plans, except 3-field 3DCRT in cord maximum dose. In addition, MS PT also provides lower doses to the right kidney (mean and V18Gy), liver (mean dose), total bowel (V20Gy and mean dose), and small bowel (V15Gy absolute volume ratio) compared with all the photon plans and PS PT. The dosimetric advantage of PT points to the possibility of treating tumor bed and comprehensive nodal areas while providing a more tolerable treatment course that could be used for dose escalation and combining with radiosensitizing chemotherapy.
采用传统光子疗法治疗术后较大的胰腺靶区体积时,常常导致所给予治疗的耐受性较差,并可能致使治疗疗程中断。本研究旨在评估使用被动散射(PS)和调制扫描(MS)质子疗法(PT)在术后胰腺癌治疗中减少正常组织受照剂量的潜在优势。确定了2010年至2013年期间在宾夕法尼亚大学罗伯茨质子治疗中心接受过PS PT治疗的11例术后胰腺癌患者。临床靶区(CTV)包括胰腺肿瘤床以及相邻的高危淋巴结区域。内部靶区(iCTV)通过四维(4D)计算机断层扫描(CT)生成,同时考虑到呼吸周期引起的靶区运动。根据患者的平均CT创建了三野和四野三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)、五野调强放射治疗、两弧容积调强放射治疗以及两野PS和MS PT。所有计划均向计划靶区(PTV)给予50.4Gy的剂量。总体而言,95%的处方剂量覆盖了98%的PTV,98%的处方剂量覆盖了99%的iCTV。结果显示,与所有光子计划相比,除了三野3DCRT在脊髓最大剂量方面外,所有质子计划给予左肾(平均剂量和V18Gy)、胃(平均剂量和V20Gy)和脊髓(最大剂量)的剂量均显著更低。此外,与所有光子计划和PS PT相比,MS PT给予右肾(平均剂量和V18Gy)、肝脏(平均剂量)、全肠道(V20Gy和平均剂量)和小肠(V15Gy绝对体积比)的剂量也更低。PT的剂量学优势表明,在治疗肿瘤床和综合淋巴结区域的同时,有可能提供一个更易耐受的治疗疗程,可用于增加剂量以及与放射增敏化疗联合使用。