• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颅内与颅外椎动脉夹层潜在风险的比较。

Comparison of potential risks between intracranial and extracranial vertebral artery dissections.

作者信息

Shin Dong Hoon, Hong Ji Man, Lee Jin Soo, Nasim Rezanejad, Sohn Sung Il, Kim Suk Jae, Bang Oh Young

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea.

出版信息

Eur Neurol. 2014;71(5-6):305-12. doi: 10.1159/000357867. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1159/000357867
PMID:24662973
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To better understand potential risks for vertebral artery (VA) dissection (VAD), we compared intracranial and extracranial VADs.

METHODS

We analyzed consecutively admitted VAD patients over a 9-year period in whom VAD was confirmed by angiography. All patients were categorized as having intracranial or extracranial VAD, and demographic and radiological characteristics of VAD were compared. We used multivariate analysis to predict the risks for intracranial and extracranial VADs.

RESULTS

The study population (n = 74) had a mean age of 46.0 ± 10.3 years. VAD was more frequent in the nondominant VA (n = 49, 66.2%).Vertical nidus of VAD was more common in the intracranial segment (81.1%), and more particularly it was most frequently located within a 2-mm perimeter of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) orifice (60.0%). Absence of traumatic history (OR 13.1, 95% CI 1.6-107.4; p = 0.016), history of hypertension (OR 14.1, 95% CI 1.1-184.6; p = 0.043)and aging (OR 1.1 per 1-year increase, 95% CI 1.0-1.2; p =0.038) were independent predictors of intracranial VAD.

CONCLUSION

As compared to extracranial VAD, intracranial VAD was particularly frequent and particularly vulnerable at the perimeters of the PICA and nondominant VA and was associated with an absent trauma history, hypertension and aging. Formation of VAD appeared to be different according to intracranial or extracranial involvement.

摘要

背景/目的:为了更好地了解椎动脉(VA)夹层(VAD)的潜在风险,我们比较了颅内和颅外VAD。

方法

我们分析了9年间连续收治的经血管造影确诊为VAD的患者。所有患者被分为颅内或颅外VAD,并比较了VAD的人口统计学和影像学特征。我们使用多变量分析来预测颅内和颅外VAD的风险。

结果

研究人群(n = 74)的平均年龄为46.0±10.3岁。非优势VA中VAD更常见(n = 49,66.2%)。VAD的垂直病灶在颅内段更常见(81.1%),更特别的是,它最常位于小脑后下动脉(PICA)开口周围2mm范围内(60.0%)。无创伤史(OR 13.1,95%CI 1.6 - 107.4;p = 0.016)、高血压史(OR 14.1,95%CI 1.1 - 184.6;p = 0.043)和年龄增长(每增加1岁OR 1.1,95%CI 1.0 - 1.2;p = 0.038)是颅内VAD的独立预测因素。

结论

与颅外VAD相比,颅内VAD在PICA和非优势VA周围特别常见且特别易患,并且与无创伤史、高血压和年龄增长有关。VAD的形成似乎因颅内或颅外受累情况而异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of potential risks between intracranial and extracranial vertebral artery dissections.颅内与颅外椎动脉夹层潜在风险的比较。
Eur Neurol. 2014;71(5-6):305-12. doi: 10.1159/000357867. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
2
Comparison of spontaneous intracranial vertebral artery dissection with large artery disease.自发性颅内椎动脉夹层与大动脉疾病的比较。
Arch Neurol. 2006 Dec;63(12):1738-44. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.12.1738.
3
Spontaneous intracranial vertebral artery dissection with acute ischemic stroke: High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging findings.自发性颅内椎动脉夹层伴急性缺血性卒中:高分辨率磁共振成像表现
Neuroradiol J. 2018 Jun;31(3):262-269. doi: 10.1177/1971400918764129. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
4
Intramural hematoma detection by susceptibility-weighted imaging in intracranial vertebral artery dissection.颅内椎动脉夹层的磁敏感加权成像检测颅内硬膜血肿。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;36(4):292-8. doi: 10.1159/000354811. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
5
Improvement and Aggravation of Spontaneous Unruptured Vertebral Artery Dissection.自发性未破裂椎动脉夹层的改善与加重
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2017;7(3):153-164. doi: 10.1159/000481442. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
6
Extracranial and intracranial vertebral artery dissection: long-term clinical and duplex sonographic follow-up.颅外和颅内椎动脉夹层:长期临床及双功超声随访
J Clin Ultrasound. 2008 Oct;36(8):472-9. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20511.
7
Dual origin of the left vertebral artery: extracranial MRA and CTA findings.左椎动脉双重起源:颅外 MRA 和 CTA 表现。
J Neurol Sci. 2010 Nov 15;298(1-2):150-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.07.017.
8
Differential features of carotid and vertebral artery dissections: the CADISP study.颈动脉和椎动脉夹层的不同特征:CADISP 研究。
Neurology. 2011 Sep 20;77(12):1174-81. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822f03fc. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
9
Risk factors, radiological features, and infarct topography of craniocervical arterial dissection.颅颈动脉夹层的危险因素、影像学特征及梗死部位
Int J Stroke. 2014 Dec;9(8):1073-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00912.x. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
10
A ruptured aneurysm arising at the leptomeningeal collateral circulation from the extracranial vertebral artery to the posterior inferior cerebellar artery associated with bilateral vertebral artery occlusion.颅内椎动脉外膜侧支循环处的破裂性动脉瘤,与双侧椎动脉闭塞相关,通向小脑后下动脉。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Feb;23(2):e135-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.08.028. Epub 2013 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress in intracranial artery dissections over past 25 years: a review and bibliometric analysis.过去25年颅内动脉夹层的研究进展:综述与文献计量分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 4;16:1623956. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1623956. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Arterial Dissection-Associated Stroke: A 22-Year Cohort Study from the Japan Stroke Data Bank.动脉夹层相关卒中的临床特征、危险因素及预后:来自日本卒中数据库的22年队列研究
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2025 Sep 1;32(9):1164-1175. doi: 10.5551/jat.65517. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
3
Vertebral Artery Dissection in a Young Adult: A Case Report.
一名年轻成年人的椎动脉夹层:病例报告
Cureus. 2024 Apr 12;16(4):e58100. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58100. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Behavior of Extracranial-to-Intracranial Extended Arterial Dissections of the Vertebral Artery.颅外-颅内椎动脉延长型夹层的行为表现。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e031032. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031032. Epub 2024 May 3.
5
High pillow and spontaneous vertebral artery dissection: A case-control study implicating "Shogun pillow syndrome".高枕与自发性椎动脉夹层:病例对照研究提示“将军枕综合征”。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Jun;9(2):501-509. doi: 10.1177/23969873231226029. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
6
Case report: Fatal ischemic stroke induced by unruptured traumatic intracranial vertebral artery dissection.病例报告:非破裂性创伤性颅内椎动脉夹层导致的致命性缺血性中风。
Front Neurol. 2023 Sep 12;14:1202698. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1202698. eCollection 2023.
7
Simultaneous intracranial and extracranial vertebral artery dissections: a case report.颅内和颅外椎动脉同时发生夹层:一例报告
Radiol Case Rep. 2023 May 24;18(8):2590-2593. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.05.002. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Influence of endothelial function and arterial stiffness on the behavior of cervicocephalic arterial dissections: An observational study.内皮功能和动脉僵硬度对颈脑动脉夹层行为的影响:一项观察性研究。
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 29;13:968488. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.968488. eCollection 2022.
9
Clinical Manifestation and Radiologic Patterns of Spontaneous Cervicocephalic Dissection According to the Anatomic Location: A Single-Center Analysis in Korean Patients.根据解剖位置的自发性颈脑夹层的临床表现和影像学特征:韩国患者的单中心分析
Neurointervention. 2022 Jul;17(2):78-86. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2022.00143. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
10
Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Imaging Features of Craniocervical Artery Dissection: Spontaneous CAD vs. Minor Traumatic CAD.颅颈动脉夹层的临床和影像学特征的回顾性对比分析:自发性颅颈动脉夹层与轻度创伤性颅颈动脉夹层
Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 16;13:836997. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.836997. eCollection 2022.