Suppr超能文献

开放性骨折患者预防性抗生素使用的显著改善:一项质量改进计划的结果

Substantial improvement in prophylactic antibiotic administration for open fracture patients: results of a performance improvement program.

作者信息

Collinge Cory A, McWilliam-Ross Kindra, Kelly Kevin C, Dombroski Derek

机构信息

*Department of Orthopedics, Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital, John Peter Smith Orthopedic Surgery Residency, Fort Worth, TX; †Department of Orthopedics, Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital, Fort Worth, TX; ‡VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX; and §Department of Orthopedics, Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth, Fort Worth, TX.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Nov;28(11):620-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000090.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Administration of early and appropriate antibiotic in treating patients with open fractures is an important early factor in preventing infection and optimizing outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of an orthopaedic trauma performance improvement program directed at early antibiotic administration for open fracture patients at our trauma center.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative cohort study of patients treated for an open fracture by before and after implementation of our performance improvement program specifically designed to address early open fracture care.

SETTING

Single metropolitan level 2 regional trauma center.

PATIENTS

Patients with open fractures treated by orthopaedic surgery (hand and spine excluded) at our institution between January 2012 and December 2013 were included. Patients transferred from another facility were excluded.

INTERVENTION

Patients were divided into one of the following 2 groups. Group 1 included patients treated before our open fracture performance improvement program (January 2012-December 2012) and group 2 comprised those treated after the program was instituted (January 2013-December 2013).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Patient demographics, injury factors, and performance measures relating to early open fracture care [eg, the characteristics of early antibiotic administration in their treatment course, including timeliness of prophylactic intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy and reasons for delay or omission of these treatments] were evaluated.

RESULTS

Group 1 was comprised of 127 patients with a total of 142 open fractures, whereas group 2 included 132 patients with a total of 156 open fractures. Patient and injury factors were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Group 1 received IV antibiotics at an average of 70.5 minutes after arrival at our institution compared with group 2 who received antibiotics at an average of 32.4 minutes (P < 0.001). The average times from emergency department arrival to physician evaluation improved from 6.5 to 4.5 minutes (P = 0.02) and antibiotic order to antibiotic delivery improved from 37 to 13 minutes (P < 0.001) for group 1 compared with group 2, respectively. The average time between physician evaluation and antibiotic showed a trend toward improvement (12.7-8.0 minutes, P = 0.57). Fifty percent of patients in group 1 (63/127) had antibiotics initiated within 1 hour of hospital arrival, whereas 78% (100/132) in group 2 had antibiotics initiated within 1 hour (P < 0.001). Eighty-five percent (112/127) of patients in group 1 had antibiotics initiated within 3 hours of hospital arrival, whereas 95% (125/132) in group 2 had antibiotics initiated within 3 hours (P = 0.03). Of those patients receiving standard antibiotics (cephalosporin), 79% (85/107) in group 1 and 91% (104/114) in group 2 received the recommended dose of IV antibiotic for their body weight (e.g., 2 g cefazolin for patients of >80 kg) (P < 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal treatment of open fracture patients with early and appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis was lacking for many patients at our trauma center. A multifaceted performance improvement program specifically concentrating on education, accountability, and antibiotic availability aimed at this aspect of orthopaedic trauma care was very effective in improving our early treatment of these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

对开放性骨折患者尽早给予恰当的抗生素治疗是预防感染及优化治疗效果的重要早期因素。本研究旨在评估在我们创伤中心针对开放性骨折患者尽早使用抗生素的骨科创伤质量改进项目的效果。

设计

对实施专门针对早期开放性骨折护理的质量改进项目前后接受开放性骨折治疗的患者进行回顾性比较队列研究。

地点

单一的大都市二级区域创伤中心。

患者

纳入2012年1月至2013年12月期间在我们机构接受骨科手术治疗的开放性骨折患者(手部和脊柱骨折除外)。排除从其他机构转来的患者。

干预措施

患者被分为以下两组之一。第1组包括在我们的开放性骨折质量改进项目实施前(2012年1月至2012年12月)接受治疗的患者,第2组包括在项目实施后(2013年1月至2013年12月)接受治疗的患者。

主要观察指标

评估患者人口统计学特征、损伤因素以及与早期开放性骨折护理相关的质量指标[例如,其治疗过程中早期抗生素使用的特征,包括预防性静脉注射(IV)抗生素治疗的及时性以及这些治疗延迟或遗漏的原因]。

结果

第1组有127例患者,共142处开放性骨折,而第2组有132例患者,共156处开放性骨折。两组患者和损伤因素无显著差异。第1组患者在抵达我们机构后平均70.5分钟接受静脉抗生素治疗,而第2组平均32.4分钟接受抗生素治疗(P<0.001)。与第2组相比,第1组从急诊科抵达至医生评估的平均时间从6.5分钟改善至4.5分钟(P = 0.02),从抗生素医嘱下达至抗生素给药的平均时间从37分钟改善至13分钟(P<0.001)。医生评估至使用抗生素的平均时间有改善趋势(12.7 - 8.0分钟,P = 0.57)。第1组50%的患者(63/127)在入院1小时内开始使用抗生素,而第2组78%(100/132)的患者在入院1小时内开始使用抗生素(P<0.001)。第1组85%(112/127)的患者在入院3小时内开始使用抗生素,而第2组95%(125/132)的患者在入院3小时内开始使用抗生素(P = 0.03)。在接受标准抗生素(头孢菌素)治疗的患者中,第1组79%(85/107)和第2组91%(104/114)的患者接受了根据体重推荐剂量的静脉抗生素治疗(例如,体重>80 kg的患者使用2 g头孢唑林)(P<0.006)。

结论

在我们的创伤中心,许多开放性骨折患者缺乏早期且恰当的抗生素预防性最佳治疗。一项专门关注教育、问责制和抗生素可及性的多方面质量改进项目,针对骨科创伤护理的这一方面,在改善我们对这些患者的早期治疗方面非常有效。

证据级别

治疗性III级。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验