Johnson Hannah C, Bailey Abby M, Baum Regan A, Justice Stephanie B, Weant Kyle A
University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA.
University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2020 Jun;55(3):193-198. doi: 10.1177/0018578719836638. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
Prophylactic antibiotic therapy is a standard of care for patients who present with open fractures due to the risk of infectious complications. This study was conducted to characterize the use of initial prophylactic antibiotic use in open fractures, guideline compliance, and its impact on care. Retrospective chart review of adult patients presenting with an open fracture to a Level 1 Trauma Center Emergency Department over a 12-month period was conducted. Of the 202 patients meeting inclusion criteria, overall compliance with guideline recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis was found to be 33.2%. The duration of prophylactic therapy was significantly longer in the noncompliant group and among those who received a secondary antibiotic ( < .05 for both comparisons). The duration of therapy was found to be significantly longer in those patients who developed an infection ( < .001). Those who developed an infection had a longer hospital length of stay (LOS) ( < .001) and intensive care unit LOS ( = .002). In addition, those who developed an infection had significantly more surgeries ( < .001) and received more red blood cell transfusions ( < .001). Correlation analysis confirmed a significant association between infection and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis ( = .02), number of surgeries ( < .0001), and number of transfusions ( < .0001). Guideline compliance was exceedingly low due to the extended duration of initial antibiotic therapy and did not appear to yield any clinical benefits. Infection was significantly associated with longer duration of initial prophylactic therapy and morbidity. Opportunities exist to elevate compliance with guidelines and to reevaluate prophylactic antimicrobial therapy in this setting.
由于存在感染并发症的风险,预防性抗生素治疗是开放性骨折患者的标准治疗方法。本研究旨在描述开放性骨折初始预防性抗生素的使用情况、指南依从性及其对治疗的影响。对一家一级创伤中心急诊科在12个月期间收治的成年开放性骨折患者进行了回顾性病历审查。在202例符合纳入标准的患者中,发现抗生素预防的总体指南依从率为33.2%。在不依从组和接受二线抗生素治疗的患者中,预防性治疗的持续时间明显更长(两项比较均P<0.05)。在发生感染的患者中,治疗持续时间明显更长(P<0.001)。发生感染的患者住院时间更长(P<0.001),重症监护病房住院时间更长(P = 0.002)。此外,发生感染的患者手术次数明显更多(P<0.001),接受红细胞输血的次数更多(P<0.001)。相关性分析证实感染与抗生素预防持续时间(P = 0.02)、手术次数(P<0.0001)和输血次数(P<0.0001)之间存在显著关联。由于初始抗生素治疗时间延长,指南依从性极低,且似乎未产生任何临床益处。感染与初始预防性治疗持续时间延长和发病率显著相关。在这种情况下,存在提高指南依从性和重新评估预防性抗菌治疗的机会。