• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健支付方与医疗产品制造商之间基于绩效的风险分担安排的现状与趋势

Current status and trends in performance-based risk-sharing arrangements between healthcare payers and medical product manufacturers.

作者信息

Carlson Josh J, Gries Katharine S, Yeung Kai, Sullivan Sean D, Garrison Louis P

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington, Box 357630, Seattle, WA, 98195-7630, USA,

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Jun;12(3):231-8. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0093-x.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-014-0093-x
PMID:24664994
Abstract

Our objective was to identify and characterize publicly available cases and related trends for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements (PBRSAs). We performed a review of PBRSAs over the past 20 years (1993-2013) using available databases and reports from colleagues and healthcare experts. These were categorized according to a previously published taxonomy of scheme types and assessed in terms of the underlying product and market attributes for each scheme. Macro-level trends were identified related to the timing of scheme adoption, countries involved, types of arrangements, and product and market factors. Our search yielded 148 arrangements. From this set, 65 arrangements included a coverage with an evidence development component, 20 included a conditional treatment continuation component, 54 included a performance-linked reimbursement component, and 42 included a financial utilization component. Each type of scheme addresses fundamental uncertainties that exist when products enter the market. The pace of adoption appears to be slowing, but new countries continue to implement PBRSAs. Over this 20-year period, there has been a consistent movement toward arrangements that minimize administrative burden. In conclusion, the pace of PBRSA adoption appears to be slowing but still has traction in many health systems. These remain a viable coverage and reimbursement mechanism for a wide range of medical products. The long-term viability and growth of these arrangements will rest in the ability of the parties to develop mutually beneficial arrangements that entail minimal administrative burden in their development and implementation.

摘要

我们的目标是识别并描述基于绩效的风险分担安排(PBRSAs)的公开案例及相关趋势。我们利用现有数据库以及同事和医疗保健专家提供的报告,对过去20年(1993 - 2013年)的PBRSAs进行了回顾。这些案例根据先前发布的计划类型分类法进行分类,并根据每个计划的基础产品和市场属性进行评估。确定了与计划采用时间、涉及国家、安排类型以及产品和市场因素相关的宏观层面趋势。我们的搜索产生了148种安排。在这一组中,65种安排包括带有证据开发部分的覆盖范围,20种包括有条件治疗延续部分,54种包括与绩效挂钩的报销部分,42种包括财务利用部分。每种计划类型都解决了产品进入市场时存在的基本不确定性。采用速度似乎正在放缓,但新的国家仍在继续实施PBRSAs。在这20年期间,一直在朝着将行政负担降至最低的安排发展。总之,PBRSAs的采用速度似乎正在放缓,但在许多卫生系统中仍具有吸引力。对于广泛的医疗产品而言,这些仍然是可行的覆盖和报销机制。这些安排的长期可行性和增长将取决于各方能否制定出互利的安排,在其制定和实施过程中带来最小的行政负担。

相似文献

1
Current status and trends in performance-based risk-sharing arrangements between healthcare payers and medical product manufacturers.医疗保健支付方与医疗产品制造商之间基于绩效的风险分担安排的现状与趋势
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Jun;12(3):231-8. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0093-x.
2
Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements: An Updated International Review.基于绩效的风险分担安排:最新国际综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Oct;35(10):1063-1072. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0535-z.
3
Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements-good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements task force.基于绩效的风险分担安排——设计、实施和评估的良好实践:ISPOR 基于绩效的风险分担安排良好实践工作组的报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(5):703-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
4
Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and diagnostics in the United States: a systematic review.美国医疗器械和诊断试剂的基于绩效的风险分担安排:系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jan;28(1):78-83. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.1.78.
5
Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements (PBRSA): Is it a Solution to Increase Bang for the Buck for Pharmaceutical Reimbursement Strategy for Our Nation and Around the World?基于绩效的风险分担安排(PBRSA):对于我们国家和世界各地的药品报销策略,这是一种增加效益的解决方案吗?
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Dec;40(12):1107-1113. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00972-w. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
6
Comment on: "Current status and trends in performance-based risk-sharing arrangements between healthcare payers and medical product manufacturers".对《医疗保健支付方与医疗产品制造商之间基于绩效的风险分担安排的现状与趋势》的评论
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Oct;12(5):565. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0118-5.
7
Authors' reply to Curto and Garattini: "Current status and trends in performance-based risk-sharing arrangements between healthcare payers and medical product manufacturers".作者对库尔托和加拉蒂尼的回复:“医疗保健支付方与医疗产品制造商之间基于绩效的风险分担安排的现状与趋势”
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Oct;12(5):567-8. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0119-4.
8
Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements for Pharmaceutical Products in the United States: A Systematic Review.美国药品的基于绩效的风险分担安排:系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Oct;23(10):1028-1040. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.10.1028.
9
Emerging roles for pharmacists in performance-based risk-sharing arrangements.药剂师在基于绩效的风险分担安排中的新角色。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Jul 1;74(13):1007-1012. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160398. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements: U.S. Payer Experience.基于绩效的风险分担安排:美国支付方的经验。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Oct;23(10):1042-1052. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.10.1042.

引用本文的文献

1
Alternative Payment Models for Innovative Medicines: A Framework for Effective Implementation.创新药物的替代支付模式:有效实施框架
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00960-1.
2
Digital health technologies and innovation patterns in diabetes ecosystems.糖尿病生态系统中的数字健康技术与创新模式。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 5;11:20552076241311740. doi: 10.1177/20552076241311740. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Evaluation of a risk-sharing agreement for atezolizumab treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a strategy to improve access in low-income countries.
评估阿替利珠单抗治疗非小细胞肺癌患者的风险分担协议:一种改善低收入国家药物可及性的策略。
Oncologist. 2025 Jul 4;30(7). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae272.
4
Design and Features of Pricing and Payment Schemes for Health Technologies: A Scoping Review and a Proposal for a Flexible Need-Driven Classification.医疗技术定价与支付方案的设计及特点:一项范围综述与灵活的需求驱动分类建议
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Jan;43(1):5-29. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01435-2. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
5
Escalating costs of innovative medicines: perspective and proposals.不断上涨的创新药物成本:观点与建议。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 24;12:1449707. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1449707. eCollection 2024.
6
Managed Entry Agreements for High-Cost, One-Off Potentially Curative Therapies: A Framework and Calculation Tool to Determine Their Suitability.高成本一次性潜在治愈性疗法的管理进入协议:确定其适用性的框架和计算工具
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Jan;43(1):53-66. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01433-4. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
7
Mapping Payment and Pricing Schemes for Health Innovation: Protocol of a Scoping Literature Review.绘制健康创新的支付与定价方案:一项范围综述的方案
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Sep;8(5):765-772. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00496-5. Epub 2024 May 21.
8
Clinical Impression of Severity Index for Parkinson's Disease and Its Association to Health-Related Quality of Life.帕金森病严重程度指数的临床印象及其与健康相关生活质量的关联。
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2023 Jan 20;10(3):392-398. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13649. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Healthcare Systems across Europe and the US: The Managed Entry Agreements Experience.欧洲和美国的医疗保健系统:有条件准入协议的经验
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;11(3):447. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030447.
10
Value Insider Season 1 Episode 3: How Does Budget Impact and Affordability in Healthcare Work? (BI and Affordability) [Podcast].《价值洞察》第一季第三集:预算如何影响医疗保健的可及性与可负担性?(商业智能与可负担性)[播客]
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Oct 26;15:7879-7884. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S390689. eCollection 2022.