• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于绩效的风险分担安排:最新国际综述。

Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements: An Updated International Review.

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 357630, Seattle, WA, 98195-7630, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Oct;35(10):1063-1072. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0535-z.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-017-0535-z
PMID:28695544
Abstract

Enthusiasm for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements (PBRSAs) continues but at variable pace across countries. Our objective was to identify and characterize publicly available cases and related trends for these arrangements. We performed a review of PBRSAs from 1993 to 2016 using the University of Washington PBRSA Database. Arrangements were categorized according to a previously published taxonomy. Macro-level trends were identified related to the timing of adoption, countries involved, types of arrangements, and disease areas. Our search yielded 437 arrangements. Among these, 183 (41.9%) were categorized as currently active, while 58.1% have expired. Five main types of arrangements have been identified, namely coverage with evidence development (149 cases, 34.1%), performance-linked reimbursement (104 cases, 23.8%), conditional treatment continuation (78 cases, 17.8%), financial or utilization (71 cases, 16.2%), and hybrid schemes with multiple components (35 cases, 8.0%). The pace of adoption varies across countries but has renewed an upward trend after a lull in 2012/2013. Conditions in the USA may be changing toward a more favorable environment of PBRSAs. Interest in PBRSAs remains high, suggesting they are a viable coverage and reimbursement mechanism for a wide range of medical products.

摘要

对基于绩效的风险分担安排(PBRSAs)的热情在各国之间持续存在,但速度不一。我们的目的是确定和描述这些安排的公开案例和相关趋势。我们使用华盛顿大学 PBRSAs 数据库,对 1993 年至 2016 年的 PBRSAs 进行了回顾。根据之前发表的分类法对安排进行了分类。确定了与采用时间、涉及国家、安排类型和疾病领域相关的宏观趋势。我们的搜索结果为 437 个安排。其中,183 个(41.9%)被归类为当前活跃,而 58.1%已经过期。已经确定了五种主要类型的安排,即有证据开发的覆盖范围(149 例,34.1%)、与绩效挂钩的报销(104 例,23.8%)、有条件的治疗延续(78 例,17.8%)、财务或利用(71 例,16.2%)和具有多个组件的混合方案(35 例,8.0%)。采用的步伐在各国之间有所不同,但在 2012/2013 年的停顿之后,又重新呈现上升趋势。美国的情况可能正在朝着有利于 PBRSAs 的环境转变。对 PBRSAs 的兴趣仍然很高,这表明它们是广泛的医疗产品的可行的覆盖范围和报销机制。

相似文献

1
Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements: An Updated International Review.基于绩效的风险分担安排:最新国际综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Oct;35(10):1063-1072. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0535-z.
2
Current status and trends in performance-based risk-sharing arrangements between healthcare payers and medical product manufacturers.医疗保健支付方与医疗产品制造商之间基于绩效的风险分担安排的现状与趋势
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Jun;12(3):231-8. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0093-x.
3
Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements-good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements task force.基于绩效的风险分担安排——设计、实施和评估的良好实践:ISPOR 基于绩效的风险分担安排良好实践工作组的报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(5):703-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
4
Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and diagnostics in the United States: a systematic review.美国医疗器械和诊断试剂的基于绩效的风险分担安排:系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jan;28(1):78-83. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.1.78.
5
Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements for Pharmaceutical Products in the United States: A Systematic Review.美国药品的基于绩效的风险分担安排:系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Oct;23(10):1028-1040. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.10.1028.
6
Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements (PBRSA): Is it a Solution to Increase Bang for the Buck for Pharmaceutical Reimbursement Strategy for Our Nation and Around the World?基于绩效的风险分担安排(PBRSA):对于我们国家和世界各地的药品报销策略,这是一种增加效益的解决方案吗?
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Dec;40(12):1107-1113. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00972-w. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
7
International experience with performance-based risk-sharing arrangements: implications for the Chinese innovative pharmaceutical market.国际上基于绩效的风险分担安排的经验:对中国创新药物市场的启示。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Oct;36(5):486-491. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000653. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
8
Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements: U.S. Payer Experience.基于绩效的风险分担安排:美国支付方的经验。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Oct;23(10):1042-1052. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.10.1042.
9
Emerging roles for pharmacists in performance-based risk-sharing arrangements.药剂师在基于绩效的风险分担安排中的新角色。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Jul 1;74(13):1007-1012. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160398. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
When do performance-based risk-sharing arrangements make sense?基于绩效的风险分担安排何时才有意义?
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Jul;16(6):569-71. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0683-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital health technologies and innovation patterns in diabetes ecosystems.糖尿病生态系统中的数字健康技术与创新模式。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 5;11:20552076241311740. doi: 10.1177/20552076241311740. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Towards implementing new payment models for the reimbursement of high-cost, curative therapies in Europe: insights from semi-structured interviews.迈向在欧洲实施针对高成本治愈性疗法报销的新支付模式:来自半结构化访谈的见解
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 20;15:1397531. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1397531. eCollection 2024.
3
[Not Available].

本文引用的文献

1
Health economic value of an innovation: delimiting the scope and framework of future market entry agreements.一项创新的健康经济价值:界定未来市场准入协议的范围和框架。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2014 Jun 23;2. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v2.24988. eCollection 2014.
2
Private sector risk-sharing agreements in the United States: trends, barriers, and prospects.美国私营部门风险分担协议:趋势、障碍与前景
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Sep;21(9):632-40.
3
When do performance-based risk-sharing arrangements make sense?基于绩效的风险分担安排何时才有意义?
[无可用内容]。
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul 15;11:169-174. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2024.3107. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Modeling First-Line Daratumumab Use for Newly Diagnosed, Transplant-Ineligible, Multiple Myeloma: A Cost-Effectiveness and Risk Analysis for Healthcare Payers.达雷妥尤单抗用于新诊断的、不符合移植条件的多发性骨髓瘤一线治疗的建模:针对医疗保健支付方的成本效益和风险分析
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Sep;8(5):651-664. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00503-9. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
5
The Value of Flexible Vaccine Manufacturing Capacity: Value Drivers, Estimation Methods, and Approaches to Value Recognition in Health Technology Assessment.灵活疫苗生产能力的价值:价值驱动因素、估算方法以及卫生技术评估中价值认可的方法。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jul;42(Suppl 2):187-197. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01396-6. Epub 2024 May 31.
6
Stakeholder Insights into Czech Performance-Based Managed Entry Agreements: Potential for Transformative Change in Pharmaceutical Access?利益相关者对捷克基于绩效的有条件准入协议的见解:药品获取变革性变化的潜力?
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;12(1):119. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010119.
7
The long-term impact and value of curative therapy for HIV: a modelling analysis.长效治疗对 HIV 的长期影响和价值:建模分析。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2023 Sep;26(9):e26170. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26170.
8
Introduction of managed entry agreements in Korea: Problem, policy, and politics.韩国引入管理式准入协议:问题、政策与政治
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Apr 13;14:999220. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.999220. eCollection 2023.
9
Opportunities and Threats of the Legally Facilitated Performance-Based Managed Entry Agreements in Slovakia: The Early-Adoption Perspective.斯洛伐克基于绩效的法定便利型管理进入协议的机遇与威胁:早期采用视角
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 19;11(8):1179. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081179.
10
Healthcare Systems across Europe and the US: The Managed Entry Agreements Experience.欧洲和美国的医疗保健系统:有条件准入协议的经验
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;11(3):447. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030447.
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Jul;16(6):569-71. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0683-z.
4
Sharing risk between payer and provider by leasing health technologies: an affordable and effective reimbursement strategy for innovative technologies?通过租赁医疗技术在支付方和提供方之间分担风险:一种针对创新技术的负担得起且有效的报销策略?
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):438-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
5
Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals in Australia.澳大利亚药品的有条件市场进入协议。
Health Policy. 2014 Sep;117(3):345-52. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
6
Current status and trends in performance-based risk-sharing arrangements between healthcare payers and medical product manufacturers.医疗保健支付方与医疗产品制造商之间基于绩效的风险分担安排的现状与趋势
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Jun;12(3):231-8. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0093-x.
7
Differential pricing of new pharmaceuticals in lower income European countries.欧洲低收入国家新药品的差异化定价。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Dec;13(6):735-41. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2013.847367.
8
Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements-good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements task force.基于绩效的风险分担安排——设计、实施和评估的良好实践:ISPOR 基于绩效的风险分担安排良好实践工作组的报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(5):703-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
9
Coverage with evidence development, only in research, risk sharing, or patient access scheme? A framework for coverage decisions.有证据开发、仅在研究中、风险分担或患者准入计划的覆盖范围?覆盖范围决策的框架。
Value Health. 2012 May;15(3):570-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
10
Linking payment to health outcomes: a taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers.将支付与健康结果挂钩:医疗保健支付方和制造商之间基于绩效的报销计划的分类法和考察。
Health Policy. 2010 Aug;96(3):179-90. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Mar 11.