Kokkayil Prathyusha, Kurapati Sravya, Negi Neema, Vajpayee Madhu
Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
J Virol Methods. 2014 Jul;203:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 23.
Molecular viral load assays are routinely used in high income countries for monitoring the copy number of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA. However, they require sophisticated facilities and expensive reagents and instruments. Hence, their routine use for patients belonging to resource limited settings is difficult and a low cost alternative is the need of the hour. This was a cross sectional study that analyzed and compared a reverse transcriptase enzyme based assay (Cavidi ExaVir Load version 3) with a real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay (Roche COBAS TaqMan) in resource limited settings with subtype C predominance. The study included 75 HIV-1 positive treatment naïve patients whose CD4+ T lymphocytes count was estimated using BD FACS system and viral loads were quantified using both Cavidi ExaVir Load assay version 3 and Roche COBAS TaqMan Real Time PCR assay. The statistical analysis was performed using the Graph Pad Prism 5 software. The difference in the mean log10 viral load values was found to be 0.2log10copies/ml. The Bland Altman plot showed a clustering of viral load values toward the lower copy range. 78% of the samples had an agreement of ≤0.5 log10 copies/ml and 90.74% of the samples had an agreement of ≤1 log10 copies/ml. Both the assays showed a trend of negative correlation with the CD4+ T cell counts. The study found that ExaVir Load assay can be used as an alternative to the existing molecular assays in resource limited settings for the purpose of routine viral load measurement and monitoring treatment response.
在高收入国家,分子病毒载量检测通常用于监测人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)RNA的拷贝数。然而,它们需要精密的设备以及昂贵的试剂和仪器。因此,要在资源有限的环境中对患者进行常规检测很困难,当下需要一种低成本的替代方法。这是一项横断面研究,在以C亚型为主的资源有限环境中,分析并比较了一种基于逆转录酶的检测方法(卡维迪ExaVir Load第3版)和实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测方法(罗氏COBAS TaqMan)。该研究纳入了75例未接受过治疗的HIV-1阳性患者,使用BD FACS系统估算其CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数,并同时使用卡维迪ExaVir Load检测第3版和罗氏COBAS TaqMan实时PCR检测方法对病毒载量进行定量。使用Graph Pad Prism 5软件进行统计分析。发现平均log10病毒载量值的差异为0.2log10拷贝/毫升。布兰德-奥特曼图显示病毒载量值聚集在较低拷贝范围。78%的样本一致性≤0.5 log10拷贝/毫升,90.74%的样本一致性≤1 log10拷贝/毫升。两种检测方法均显示出与CD4+ T细胞计数呈负相关的趋势。该研究发现,在资源有限的环境中,为了进行常规病毒载量测量和监测治疗反应,ExaVir Load检测可作为现有分子检测方法的替代方法。