Suppr超能文献

儿科肿瘤学家向专科姑息治疗的转诊实践。

Referral practices of pediatric oncologists to specialized palliative care.

作者信息

Wentlandt Kirsten, Krzyzanowska Monika K, Swami Nadia, Rodin Gary, Le Lisa W, Sung Lillian, Zimmermann Camilla

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada,

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2014 Sep;22(9):2315-22. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2203-6. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aims of this study are to describe the attitudes and referral practices of pediatric oncologists (POs) to specialized palliative care (SPC), and to compare them with those of adult oncologists (AOs).

METHODS

Canadian members of the American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (ASPHO), Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists (CAMO), Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists (CARO), and the Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology (CSSO) participated in an anonymous survey assessing SPC referral practices.

RESULTS

The response rate was 70 % (646/921), 52 % (43/82) for ASPHO members; 5 CARO members self-identified as POs, for a total of 48 POs and 595 AOs. Ninety-six percent of POs had access to inpatient SPC consultation services (vs. 48 % AOs), 31 % to a PCU (vs. 82 % AOs), and 27 % to an outpatient SPC clinic (vs. 73 % AOs). POs more often stated their SPC services accepted patients on chemotherapy than AOs (64 vs. 37 %, p = 0.0004). POs were less likely to refer only after chemotherapy had been stopped (13 vs. 29 % for AOs) and more likely to state that ideally referral should occur at the diagnosis of cancer/incurable cancer (73 vs. 43 %). POs were more likely to agree they would refer earlier if palliative care were renamed "supportive care" (58 vs. 33 %, p < 0.0001), that palliative care adds too many providers (17 vs. 7 %, p = 0.002), and that palliative care was perceived negatively by their patients (60 vs. 43 %, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Although POs acknowledge the importance of early referral to SPC for children with cancer, there remain resource and attitudinal barriers to overcome in this regard.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述儿科肿瘤学家(POs)对专科姑息治疗(SPC)的态度和转诊做法,并将其与成人肿瘤学家(AOs)的态度和做法进行比较。

方法

美国儿科血液学/肿瘤学学会(ASPHO)、加拿大医学肿瘤学家协会(CAMO)、加拿大放射肿瘤学家协会(CARO)以及加拿大外科肿瘤学学会(CSSO)的加拿大成员参与了一项评估SPC转诊做法的匿名调查。

结果

回复率为70%(646/921),ASPHO成员的回复率为52%(43/82);5名CARO成员自称是POs,POs总数为48名,AOs为595名。96%的POs能够获得住院SPC咨询服务(相比之下,AOs为48%),31%能够获得姑息治疗单元(PCU)服务(相比之下,AOs为82%),27%能够获得门诊SPC诊所服务(相比之下,AOs为73%)。POs比AOs更常表示其SPC服务接受正在接受化疗的患者(64%对37%,p = 0.0004)。POs在化疗停止后才转诊的可能性较小(AOs为29%,POs为13%),且更有可能表示理想情况下转诊应在癌症/无法治愈的癌症诊断时进行(73%对43%)。POs更有可能同意,如果将姑息治疗重新命名为“支持性护理”,他们会更早转诊(58%对33%,p < 0.0001),认为姑息治疗增加了过多的医疗服务提供者(17%对7%,p = 0.002),并且认为患者对姑息治疗的看法是负面的(60%对43%,p = 0.02)。

结论

尽管POs承认早期转诊至SPC对癌症患儿的重要性,但在这方面仍存在资源和态度方面的障碍需要克服。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验