van Oudheusden Thijs R, Braam Hidde J, Nienhuijs Simon W, Wiezer Marinus J, van Ramshorst Bert, Luyer Misha D, Lemmens Valery E, de Hingh Ignace H
Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands,
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;21(8):2621-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3655-0. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
When peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is diagnosed during emergency surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC), further treatment with curative intent may seem futile given the known poor prognosis of both PC and emergency surgery. The aim of the current study was to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for CRC patients who previously underwent emergency surgery in the presence of PC.
All patients with synchronous PC of CRC referred to two tertiary centers between April 2005 and November 2013 were included in this study. Operative, postoperative and survival details were compared between patients presenting in an emergency or elective setting.
In total, 149 patients with synchronous PC underwent CRS and HIPEC. Amongst these patients, 36 (24.2 %) initially presented with acute symptoms requiring emergency surgery. Acute presentation did not result in a longer interval between the initial operation and HIPEC (2.2 vs. 2.1 months; P = 0.09). When comparing operative outcomes, no significant differences were found in blood loss (P = 0.47), operation time (P = 0.39), or completeness of cytoreduction (P = 0.97). In addition, complication rates, degree and types of complication did not differ between the groups. Median survival was 36.1 months for emergency presentation compared with 32.1 in the elective group (P = 0.73).
CRS + HIPEC may be performed safely in patients with PC of colorectal origin presenting with acute symptoms requiring emergency surgery. More importantly, the 5-year survival rate in these patients was equal to elective cases. This should be regarded as promising and therefore considered for these patients.
当在结直肠癌(CRC)急诊手术期间诊断出腹膜癌转移(PC)时,鉴于PC和急诊手术已知的不良预后,进行有治愈意图的进一步治疗可能看似徒劳。本研究的目的是调查细胞减灭术(CRS)和热灌注化疗(HIPEC)对先前在存在PC的情况下接受急诊手术的CRC患者的可行性和有效性。
2005年4月至2013年11月期间转诊至两个三级中心的所有同步性CRC合并PC患者纳入本研究。比较急诊或择期就诊患者的手术、术后和生存细节。
共有149例同步性PC患者接受了CRS和HIPEC。在这些患者中,36例(24.2%)最初表现为需要急诊手术的急性症状。急性发病并未导致初次手术与HIPEC之间的间隔时间延长(2.2个月对2.1个月;P = 0.09)。比较手术结果时,在失血量(P = 0.47)、手术时间(P = 0.39)或细胞减灭的彻底性(P = 0.97)方面未发现显著差异。此外,两组之间的并发症发生率、并发症程度和类型也没有差异。急诊就诊患者的中位生存期为36.1个月,而择期组为32.1个月(P = 0.73)。
对于因急性症状需要急诊手术的结直肠源性PC患者,可以安全地进行CRS + HIPEC。更重要的是,这些患者的5年生存率与择期病例相当。这应被视为有前景的,因此应考虑用于这些患者。