Huang Chao-Qun, Min Yao, Wang Shu-Yi, Yang Xiao-Jun, Liu Yang, Xiong Bin, Yonemura Yutaka, Li Yan
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center & Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Wuhan, P.R. China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Central Hospital of Wuhan Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, P.R. China.
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 27;8(33):55657-55683. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17497. eCollection 2017 Aug 15.
The therapeutic efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is still under debate. This meta-analysis and systematic review of published literature on this comprehensive strategy aims to evaluate its efficacy on CRC patients with PC.
A systemic review with meta-analysis of published literatures on treatment of CRS plus HIPEC for patients with PC from CRC was performed. In addition, a summary of study results of published literatures concerning CRS plus HIPEC treating patients with PC from CRC was also conducted.
A total of 76 studies were selected, including 1 randomized controlled trial, 14 non-randomized controlled studies, and 61 non-controlled studies. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) in the 15 researches for meta-analysis was 2.67 (95% CI, 2.21-3.23, = 0%, < 0.00001), and no significant evidence of publication bias was found. The difference of chemotherapy regimens of HIPEC was not associated with OS and DFS (disease-free survival) after CRS and HIPEC, with no significant difference of heterogeneity ( = 0.27, = 24.1%). In both groups of mitomycin C based HIPEC group and oxaliplatin group, patients received HIPEC had significant better survival ( < 0.00001). The mean mortality and morbidity for HIPEC program were 2.8% and 33.0%, respectively.
This meta-analysis revealed that comprehensive therapeutic strategy of CRS plus HIPEC could bring survival benefit for selected patients with PC from CRC with acceptable safety.
结直肠癌(CRC)所致腹膜癌病(PC)患者接受细胞减灭术(CRS)联合腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)的治疗效果仍存在争议。本荟萃分析和已发表文献的系统评价旨在评估该综合策略对CRC合并PC患者的疗效。
对已发表的关于CRS联合HIPEC治疗CRC合并PC患者的文献进行系统评价和荟萃分析。此外,还对已发表的关于CRS联合HIPEC治疗CRC合并PC患者的研究结果进行了总结。
共纳入76项研究,包括1项随机对照试验、14项非随机对照研究和61项非对照研究。15项纳入荟萃分析的研究中,总生存(OS)的合并风险比(HR)为2.67(95%CI,2.21 - 3.23,I² = 0%,P < 0.00001),未发现明显的发表偏倚证据。HIPEC化疗方案的差异与CRS和HIPEC后的OS及无病生存(DFS)无关,异质性无显著差异(I² = 0.27,P = 24.1%)。在丝裂霉素C为基础的HIPEC组和奥沙利铂组中,接受HIPEC治疗的患者生存情况均显著更好(P < 0.00001)。HIPEC方案的平均死亡率和发病率分别为2.8%和33.0%。
本荟萃分析表明,CRS联合HIPEC的综合治疗策略可为部分CRC合并PC患者带来生存获益,且安全性可接受。