The School of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of New South Wales, Kensington NSW, Australia.
Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 14;5:195. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00195. eCollection 2014.
In the present study we addressed whether the processing of global form and motion was dependent on visual awareness. Continuous flash suppression (CFS) was used to suppress from awareness global dot motion (GDM) and Glass pattern stimuli. We quantified the minimum time taken for both pattern types to break suppression with the signal coherence of the pattern (0, 25, 50, and 100% signal) and the type of global structure (rotational, and radial) as independent variables. For both form and motion patterns increasing signal coherence decreased the time required to break suppression. This was the same for both rotational and radial global patterns. However, GDM patterns broke suppression faster than Glass patterns. In a supplementary experiment, we confirmed that this difference in break times is not because of the temporal nature of GDM patterns in attracting attention. In Experiment 2, we examined whether the processing of dynamic Glass patterns were similarly dependent on visual awareness. The processing of dynamic Glass patterns is involves both motion and form systems, and we questioned whether the interaction of these two systems was dependent on visual awareness. The suppression of dynamic Glass patterns was also dependent on signal coherence and the time course of suppression break resembled the detection of global motion and not global form. In Experiment 3 we ruled out the possibility that faster suppression break times was because the visual system is more sensitive to highly coherent form and motion patterns. Here contrast changing GDM and Glass patterns were superimposed on the dynamic CFS mask, and the minimum time required for them to be detected was measured. We showed that there was no difference in detection times for patterns of 0 and 100% coherence. The advantage of highly coherent global motion and form patterns in breaking suppression indicated that the processing and interaction of global motion and form systems occur without visual awareness.
在本研究中,我们探讨了全局形状和运动的加工是否依赖于视觉意识。连续闪光抑制(CFS)用于抑制全局点运动(GDM)和 Glass 图案刺激的视觉意识。我们用量化的信号相干性(0、25、50 和 100%)和全局结构类型(旋转和放射状)作为独立变量,来确定两种模式打破抑制所需的最短时间。对于形状和运动模式,信号相干性的增加降低了打破抑制所需的时间。对于旋转和放射状全局模式都是如此。然而,GDM 模式比 Glass 模式更快地打破抑制。在补充实验中,我们证实了这种突破时间的差异不是因为 GDM 模式在吸引注意力方面的时间性质。在实验 2 中,我们检查了动态 Glass 模式的处理是否也依赖于视觉意识。动态 Glass 模式的处理涉及运动和形状系统,我们质疑这两个系统的相互作用是否依赖于视觉意识。动态 Glass 模式的抑制也依赖于信号相干性,抑制突破的时间进程类似于全局运动的检测,而不是全局形状的检测。在实验 3 中,我们排除了更快的抑制突破时间是因为视觉系统对高相干的形状和运动模式更敏感的可能性。在这里,对比度变化的 GDM 和 Glass 模式叠加在动态 CFS 掩模上,并测量它们被检测到的最短时间。我们表明,在检测时间上,0 和 100%相干性的模式没有差异。高相干全局运动和形状模式在打破抑制方面的优势表明,全局运动和形状系统的处理和相互作用发生在没有视觉意识的情况下。