Gómez-Puerta José A, Waikar Sushrut S, Solomon Daniel H, Liu Jun, Alarcón Graciela S, Winkelmayer Wolfgang C, Costenbader Karen H
Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Clin Cell Immunol. 2013 Dec 1;4(6):179. doi: 10.4172/2155-9899.1000179.
Little is known about erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) utilization among lupus nephritis (LN) patients with incipient ESRD. We aimed to identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with ESA use among incident LN ESRD patients.
Among all individuals age ≥18 with incident ESRD from 1995-2008 in the U.S. Renal Data System (USRDS), we identified those with systemic lupus erythematosus (ICD-9 code 710.0) as the cause of ESRD. ESA use at ESRD onset was ascertained from the Medical Evidence Report. Year of onset, age, sex, race/ethnicity, medical insurance, employment status, residential region, clinical factors and comorbidities were considered potentially associated with ESA use in multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses.
We identified 12,533 individuals with incident LN ESRD (1% of entire population). Of those, 4,288 (34%) received an ESA preceding ESRD. In multivariable-adjusted models, ESA users had higher serum albumin and hemoglobin concentrations, were more likely to be women, and to live in the Northeast. Conversely, Medicaid beneficiaries, the uninsured, unemployed, African Americans, Hispanics, and those with IV drug use, congestive heart failure and obesity had lower ESA use.
Among all U.S. patients and those with LN who developed ESRD, approximately one third received ESAs. Patient sex, race, age, medical insurance, residential region and clinical factors were significantly associated with ESA therapy. While there are no guidelines for ESA use in LN patients approaching ESRD, there has been wide sociodemographic variation, raising questions about ESA prescription practices.
对于处于早期终末期肾病(ESRD)的狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者使用促红细胞生成素(ESA)的情况,我们了解甚少。我们旨在确定初发LN-ESRD患者中与使用ESA相关的社会人口统计学和临床因素。
在美国肾脏数据系统(USRDS)中,于1995年至2008年期间确诊为ESRD且年龄≥18岁的所有个体中,我们确定那些因系统性红斑狼疮(ICD-9编码710.0)导致ESRD的患者。根据医疗证据报告确定ESRD发病时ESA的使用情况。在多变量调整的逻辑回归分析中,发病年份、年龄、性别、种族/民族、医疗保险、就业状况、居住地区、临床因素和合并症被视为可能与使用ESA相关的因素。
我们确定了12533例初发LN-ESRD患者(占总人口的1%)。其中,4288例(34%)在ESRD之前接受了ESA治疗。在多变量调整模型中,使用ESA的患者血清白蛋白和血红蛋白浓度较高,更可能为女性,且居住在东北部地区。相反,医疗补助受益人、未参保者、失业者、非裔美国人、西班牙裔以及有静脉吸毒史、充血性心力衰竭和肥胖的患者使用ESA的比例较低。
在所有美国患者以及那些发展为ESRD的LN患者中,约三分之一接受了ESA治疗。患者的性别、种族、年龄、医疗保险、居住地区和临床因素与ESA治疗显著相关。虽然对于接近ESRD的LN患者使用ESA尚无指南,但存在广泛的社会人口统计学差异,这引发了关于ESA处方实践的疑问。