• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国大规模伤亡事件的流行病学

Epidemiology of mass casualty incidents in the United States.

作者信息

Schenk Ellen, Wijetunge Gamunu, Mann N Clay, Lerner E Brooke, Longthorne Anders, Dawson Drew

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):408-16. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.882999. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

DOI:10.3109/10903127.2014.882999
PMID:24673664
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to characterize and estimate the frequency of mass casualty incidents (MCIs) occurring in the United States during the year 2010, as reported by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel.

METHODS

Using the 2010 National EMS Database of the National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS), containing data from 32 states and territories, we estimated and weighted the frequency of MCIs documented by EMS personnel based on their perception of the event to produce incidence rates of MCIs per 100,000 population and MCIs per 1,000 9-1-1 calls requesting EMS service. We conducted descriptive analyses to characterize the MCIs by geographic location, incident type, and time of day as well as the MCI patients by demographic and health information. We used chi-squared tests to compare response delays and two-tailed t-tests to compare system response times between EMS responses documented as MCIs and those not.

RESULTS

Among the 9,776,094 EMS responses in the 2010 National EMS Database, 14,504 entries were documented as MCI. These entries represented an estimated 9,913 unique MCIs from the National EMS Database: 39.1% occurred in the South Atlantic region of the United States where only 19.1% of the population resides, 60.9% occurred in an urban setting, and 58.4% occurred on a street or highway. There were an estimated 13,677 MCI patients. The prehospital EMS personnel's primary impressions of the patients ranged from electrocution (0.01%) to traumatic injury (40.7%). Of the patients with a primary impression of injury (N = 7,960), motor vehicle traffic crash was the cause of injury for 62.7%. Among the MCI EMS responses, 47.6% documented experiencing a response delay compared to only 12.3% of non-MCI EMS responses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the range of health conditions and characteristics of EMS responses that EMS personnel perceive as MCIs, suggests that response delays are common during MCIs, and indicates there may be underreporting of all persons involved in an MCI. The National EMS Database is useful for describing MCIs and may help guide national leadership in strengthening EMS system preparedness for MCIs.

摘要

目的

我们试图描述并估算2010年美国紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员报告的大规模伤亡事件(MCI)的发生频率。

方法

利用2010年国家紧急医疗服务信息系统(NEMSIS)的国家EMS数据库,该数据库包含来自32个州和地区的数据,我们根据EMS人员对事件的认知,估算并加权他们记录的MCI频率,以得出每10万人口的MCI发病率以及每1000次拨打911请求EMS服务的MCI发病率。我们进行描述性分析,按地理位置、事件类型和一天中的时间来描述MCI,并按人口统计学和健康信息来描述MCI患者。我们使用卡方检验比较响应延迟,使用双尾t检验比较记录为MCI的EMS响应与非MCI的EMS响应之间的系统响应时间。

结果

在2010年国家EMS数据库的9776094次EMS响应中,有14504条记录为MCI。这些记录代表了国家EMS数据库中估计的9913起独特的MCI:39.1%发生在美国南大西洋地区,而该地区仅居住着19.1%的人口;60.9%发生在城市环境中;58.4%发生在街道或高速公路上。估计有13677名MCI患者。院前EMS人员对患者的初步印象范围从触电(0.01%)到创伤性损伤(40.7%)。在初步印象为受伤的患者中(N = 7960),机动车交通事故是62.7%的受伤原因。在MCI的EMS响应中,47.6%记录有响应延迟,而非MCI的EMS响应中只有12.3%有响应延迟。

结论

本研究展示了EMS人员视为MCI的健康状况范围和EMS响应特征,表明在MCI期间响应延迟很常见,并指出可能存在对所有参与MCI的人员报告不足的情况。国家EMS数据库有助于描述MCI,并可能有助于指导国家领导层加强EMS系统对MCI的准备工作。

相似文献

1
Epidemiology of mass casualty incidents in the United States.美国大规模伤亡事件的流行病学
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):408-16. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.882999. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
2
Description of Medication Administration by Emergency Medical Services during Mass-casualty Incidents in the United States.美国大规模伤亡事件期间紧急医疗服务的药物管理描述。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Apr;31(2):141-9. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1600008X. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
3
Epidemiology of Emergency Medical Services-Assessed Mass Casualty Incidents according to Causes.按原因分类的急诊医疗服务评估的大规模伤亡事件流行病学
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Mar;31(3):449-56. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.3.449. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
4
A Descriptive Analysis of Prehospital Response to Hazardous Materials Events.对危险物质事件的院前反应的描述性分析。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Oct;30(5):466-71. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1500504X.
5
Description of procedures performed on patients by emergency medical services during mass casualty incidents in the United States.美国紧急医疗服务机构在大规模伤亡事件中对患者实施的程序描述。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;33(8):1030-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.035. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
6
Prehospital Response Time Delays for Emergency Patients in Events of Concurrent Mass Casualty Incidents.大规模伤亡事件并发时急诊患者的院前反应时间延迟
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Feb;12(1):94-100. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2017.42. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
7
Managing multiple-casualty incidents: a rural medical preparedness training assessment.处理多伤员事件:农村医疗准备培训评估。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Aug;28(4):334-41. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13000423. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
8
Analysis of multiple casualty incidents - a prospective cohort study.多起伤亡事件分析——一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Nov;49(10):1527-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00761.x.
9
Prehospital Response Time of the Emergency Medical Service during Mass Casualty Incidents and the Effect of Triage: A Retrospective Study.突发事件中紧急医疗服务的院前反应时间和分诊的效果:一项回顾性研究。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jun;16(3):1091-1098. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.40. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
10
A case series analysis of mass casualty incidents.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000 Oct-Dec;4(4):299-304. doi: 10.1080/10903120090940985.

引用本文的文献

1
Tranexamic acid needs to be implemented in mass casualty incident protocols.氨甲环酸需要纳入大规模伤亡事件预案中。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1931-1933. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02517-8. Epub 2024 May 27.
2
Incorporating mass casualty incidents training in surgical education program.将大规模伤亡事件培训纳入外科教育计划。
Global Surg Educ. 2022;1(1):17. doi: 10.1007/s44186-022-00018-z. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
3
Disaster day: a simulation-based competition for educating emergency medicine residents and medical students on disaster medicine.
灾难日:一场基于模拟的竞赛,用于培训急诊医学住院医师和医学生的灾难医学知识。
Int J Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 13;16(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12245-023-00520-1.
4
Effects of mass casualty incidents on anxiety, depression and PTSD among doctors and nurses: a systematic review protocol.大量伤亡事件对医生和护士焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍的影响:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 11;13(9):e075478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075478.
5
Epidemiology of mass casualty incidents in a tertiary care trauma center in eastern India: A retrospective observational study.印度东部一家三级创伤中心群体伤亡事件的流行病学:一项回顾性观察研究。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2022 Apr 11;22(2):96-103. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.342806. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
6
Mobilization of Resources and Emergency Response on the National Scale.国家层面的资源调动和应急响应。
Surg Clin North Am. 2022 Feb;102(1):169-180. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2021.09.014.
7
Systematic media review: A novel method to assess mass-trauma epidemiology in absence of databases-A pilot-study in Rwanda.系统媒体综述:在缺乏数据库的情况下评估大规模创伤流行病学的新方法-在卢旺达的一项试点研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0258446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258446. eCollection 2021.
8
[Cardiac arrest under special circumstances].[特殊情况下的心脏骤停]
Notf Rett Med. 2021;24(4):447-523. doi: 10.1007/s10049-021-00891-z. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
9
Going vertical: triage flags improve extraction times for priority patients.走向垂直化:分诊标记可缩短优先患者的提取时间。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Aug 21;1(6):1185-1193. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12235. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Pediatric Emergency Medicine Disaster Simulation Curriculum: The 5-Minute Trauma Assessment for Pediatric Residents (TRAP-5).儿科急诊灾难模拟课程:儿科住院医师的 5 分钟创伤评估 (TRAP-5)。
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Aug 21;16:10940. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10940.