• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按原因分类的急诊医疗服务评估的大规模伤亡事件流行病学

Epidemiology of Emergency Medical Services-Assessed Mass Casualty Incidents according to Causes.

作者信息

Park Ju Ok, Shin Sang Do, Song Kyoung Jun, Hong Ki Jeong, Kim Jungeun

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine and Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea .

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea .

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Mar;31(3):449-56. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.3.449. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2016.31.3.449
PMID:26955248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4779872/
Abstract

To effectively mitigate and reduce the burden of mass casualty incidents (MCIs), preparedness measures should be based on MCIs' epidemiological characteristics. This study aimed to describe the epidemiological characteristics and outcomes of emergency medical services (EMS)-assessed MCIs from multiple areas according to cause. Therefore, we extracted the records of all MCIs that involved ≥ 6 patients from an EMS database. All patients involved in EMS-assessed MCIs from six areas were eligible for this study, and their prehospital and hospital records were reviewed for a 1-year period. The EMS-assessed MCIs were categorized as being caused by fire accidents (FAs), road traffic accidents (RTAs), chemical and biological agents (CBs), and other mechanical causes (MECHs). A total of 362 EMS-assessed MCIs were identified, with a crude incidence rate of 0.6-5.0/100,000 population. Among these MCIs, 322 were caused by RTAs. The MCIs involved 2,578 patients, and 54.3% of these patients were women. We observed that the most common mechanism of injury varied according to MCI cause, and that a higher number of patients per incident was associated with a longer prehospital time. The highest hospital admission rate was observed for CBs (16 patients, 55.2%), and most patients in RTAs and MECHs experienced non-severe injuries. The total number of deaths was 32 (1.2%). An EMS-assessed MCI database was established using the EMS database and medical records review. Our findings indicate that RTA MCIs create a burden on EMS and emergency department resources, although CB MCIs create a burden on hospitals' resources.

摘要

为有效减轻和降低大规模伤亡事件(MCI)的负担,防范措施应基于MCI的流行病学特征。本研究旨在根据病因描述来自多个地区的经紧急医疗服务(EMS)评估的MCI的流行病学特征及结局。因此,我们从一个EMS数据库中提取了所有涉及≥6名患者的MCI记录。来自六个地区的所有经EMS评估的MCI患者均符合本研究条件,并对其院前和院内记录进行了为期1年的审查。经EMS评估的MCI按病因分为火灾事故(FA)、道路交通事故(RTA)、化学和生物制剂(CB)以及其他机械原因(MECH)。共识别出362起经EMS评估的MCI,粗发病率为0.6 - 5.0/10万人口。在这些MCI中,322起由RTA引起。这些MCI涉及2578名患者,其中54.3%为女性。我们观察到,最常见的损伤机制因MCI病因而异,且每次事件中患者数量越多,院前时间越长。CB的医院收治率最高(16例患者,55.2%),RTA和MECH中的大多数患者为非重伤。死亡总数为32例(1.2%)。通过EMS数据库和病历审查建立了经EMS评估的MCI数据库。我们的研究结果表明,RTA MCI给EMS和急诊科资源带来负担,而CB MCI给医院资源带来负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10f3/4779872/28d775f8ef23/jkms-31-449-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10f3/4779872/28d775f8ef23/jkms-31-449-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10f3/4779872/28d775f8ef23/jkms-31-449-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Epidemiology of Emergency Medical Services-Assessed Mass Casualty Incidents according to Causes.按原因分类的急诊医疗服务评估的大规模伤亡事件流行病学
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Mar;31(3):449-56. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.3.449. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
2
Epidemiology of mass casualty incidents in the United States.美国大规模伤亡事件的流行病学
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):408-16. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.882999. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
3
Description of Medication Administration by Emergency Medical Services during Mass-casualty Incidents in the United States.美国大规模伤亡事件期间紧急医疗服务的药物管理描述。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Apr;31(2):141-9. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1600008X. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
4
Prehospital Response Time Delays for Emergency Patients in Events of Concurrent Mass Casualty Incidents.大规模伤亡事件并发时急诊患者的院前反应时间延迟
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Feb;12(1):94-100. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2017.42. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
5
Analysis of multiple casualty incidents - a prospective cohort study.多起伤亡事件分析——一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Nov;49(10):1527-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00761.x.
6
Prehospital Response Time of the Emergency Medical Service during Mass Casualty Incidents and the Effect of Triage: A Retrospective Study.突发事件中紧急医疗服务的院前反应时间和分诊的效果:一项回顾性研究。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jun;16(3):1091-1098. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.40. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
7
Emergency medical services preparedness in mass casualty incidents: A systematic review.突发事件中紧急医疗服务的准备工作:系统评价。
Am J Disaster Med. 2023;18(1):79-91. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.0461.
8
Managing multiple-casualty incidents: a rural medical preparedness training assessment.处理多伤员事件:农村医疗准备培训评估。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Aug;28(4):334-41. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13000423. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
9
Description of procedures performed on patients by emergency medical services during mass casualty incidents in the United States.美国紧急医疗服务机构在大规模伤亡事件中对患者实施的程序描述。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;33(8):1030-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.035. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
10
Epidemiology of mass casualty incidents in a tertiary care trauma center in eastern India: A retrospective observational study.印度东部一家三级创伤中心群体伤亡事件的流行病学:一项回顾性观察研究。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2022 Apr 11;22(2):96-103. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.342806. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Extended reality training for mass casualty incidents: a systematic review on effectiveness and experience of medical first responders.针对大规模伤亡事件的扩展现实训练:对医疗急救人员有效性和经验的系统评价
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 23;17(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00685-3.
2
Use of Self-Efficacy Scale in Mass Casualty Incidents During Drill Exercises.在演习中使用自我效能感量表应对大规模伤亡事件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 18;24(1):745. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11175-w.
3
Epidemiology of mass casualty incidents in a tertiary care trauma center in eastern India: A retrospective observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
Description of procedures performed on patients by emergency medical services during mass casualty incidents in the United States.美国紧急医疗服务机构在大规模伤亡事件中对患者实施的程序描述。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;33(8):1030-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.035. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
2
The Boston Marathon Bombings Mass Casualty Incident: One Emergency Department's Information Systems Challenges and Opportunities.《波士顿马拉松爆炸案大量伤亡事件:一家急诊科的信息系统挑战与机遇》。
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;66(1):51-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
3
Epidemiology of mass casualty incidents in the United States.
印度东部一家三级创伤中心群体伤亡事件的流行病学:一项回顾性观察研究。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2022 Apr 11;22(2):96-103. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.342806. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
4
Systematic media review: A novel method to assess mass-trauma epidemiology in absence of databases-A pilot-study in Rwanda.系统媒体综述:在缺乏数据库的情况下评估大规模创伤流行病学的新方法-在卢旺达的一项试点研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0258446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258446. eCollection 2021.
5
Surge Capacity and Mass Casualty Incidents Preparedness of Emergency Departments in a Metropolitan City: a Regional Survey Study.大都市急诊科的应急能力和大规模伤亡事件准备情况:一项区域性调查研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Aug 23;36(33):e210. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e210.
6
Autoinjector device for rapid administration of drugs and antidotes in emergency situations and in mass casualty management.自动注射器设备,用于在紧急情况下和大规模伤亡管理中快速给予药物和解毒剂。
J Int Med Res. 2020 May;48(5):300060520926019. doi: 10.1177/0300060520926019.
7
Designing and executing a functional exercise to test a novel informatics tool for mass casualty triage.设计并执行一项功能演练,以测试一种用于大规模伤亡分诊的新型信息学工具。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):1091-1098. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz087.
8
Epidemiologic Characteristics of Injured School-age Patients Transported via Emergency Medical Services in Korea.韩国因伤学龄患者经急诊医疗服务转运的流行病学特征。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Mar 5;33(10):e73. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e73.
美国大规模伤亡事件的流行病学
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):408-16. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.882999. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
4
Scientific framework for research on disaster and mass casualty incident in Korea: building consensus using Delphi method.韩国灾害与大规模伤亡事件研究的科学框架:使用德尔菲法达成共识。
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Jan;29(1):122-8. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.1.122. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
5
Analysis of multiple casualty incidents - a prospective cohort study.多起伤亡事件分析——一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Nov;49(10):1527-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00761.x.
6
A case series analysis of mass casualty incidents.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000 Oct-Dec;4(4):299-304. doi: 10.1080/10903120090940985.
7
Mass casualty incident. Integration with prehospital care.大规模伤亡事件。与院前急救的整合。
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1990 Feb;8(1):163-75.