• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在多中心放射医学部门实施“禁飞”安全文化。

Implementation of a "No Fly" safety culture in a multicenter radiation medicine department.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Medicine, North Shore-LIJ Health System, New Hyde Park, New York.

Department of Radiation Medicine, North Shore-LIJ Health System, New Hyde Park, New York.

出版信息

Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jan-Mar;2(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.prro.2011.04.010
PMID:24674032
Abstract

PURPOSE

The safe delivery of radiation therapy requires multiple disciplines and interactions to perform flawlessly for each patient. Because treatment is individualized and every aspect of the patient's care is unique, it is difficult to regiment a delivery process that works flawlessly. The purpose of this study is to describe one safety-directed component of our quality program called the "No Fly Policy" (NFP).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Our quality assurance program for radiation therapy reviewed the entire process of care prior, during, and after a patient's treatment course. Each component of care was broken down and rebuilt within a matrix of multidisciplinary safety quality checklists (QCL). The QCL process map was subsequently streamlined with revised task due dates and stopping rules. The NFP was introduced to place a holding pattern on treatment initiation pending reconciliation of associated stopping events. The NFP was introduced in a pilot phase using a Six-Sigma process improvement approach. Quantitative analysis on the performance of the new QCLs was performed using crystal reports in the Oncology Information Systems. Root cause analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Notable improvements in QCL performance were observed. The variances among staff in completing tasks reduced by a factor of at least 3, suggesting better process control. Steady improvements over time indicated an increasingly compliant and controlled adoption of the new safety-oriented process map. Stopping events led to rescheduling treatments with average and maximum delays of 2 and 4 days, respectively, with no reported adverse effects. The majority of stopping events were due to incomplete plan approvals stemming from treatment planning delays. Whereas these may have previously solicited last-minute interventions, including intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance, the NFP enabled nonpunitive, reasonable schedule adjustments to mitigate compromises in safe delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the NFP has helped to mitigate risk from expedited care, convert reactive to proactive delays, and created a checklist, process driven, and variance-reducing culture in a large, multicenter department.

摘要

目的

放射治疗的安全实施需要多个学科和交互作用,以确保每个患者的治疗都能完美无缺。由于治疗是个体化的,患者护理的每个方面都是独特的,因此很难制定出完美无缺的交付流程。本研究的目的是描述我们质量计划中的一个安全导向组件,称为“禁飞政策”(NFP)。

方法和材料

我们的放射治疗质量保证计划审查了患者治疗过程前后的整个护理过程。护理的每个组成部分都在多学科安全质量检查表(QCL)的矩阵中进行了分解和重建。随后,通过修订任务的截止日期和停止规则,简化了 QCL 流程图。引入 NFP 是为了在治疗开始时暂停治疗,等待相关停止事件的协调。NFP 是在试点阶段引入的,采用六西格玛过程改进方法。使用 Oncology Information Systems 中的 Crystal Reports 对新 QCL 的性能进行了定量分析。进行了根本原因分析。

结果

观察到 QCL 性能的显著改进。员工完成任务的差异减少了至少 3 倍,表明过程控制得到了改善。随着时间的推移稳步改进表明,新的以安全为导向的流程图的采用越来越符合规定和受到控制。停止事件导致治疗重新安排,平均和最大延迟分别为 2 天和 4 天,没有报告不良影响。大多数停止事件是由于治疗计划延迟导致计划批准不完整。虽然这些事件以前可能需要进行最后一刻的干预,包括调强放射治疗质量保证,但 NFP 使非惩罚性、合理的日程调整成为可能,以减轻安全交付中的妥协。

结论

实施 NFP 有助于减轻加速护理的风险,将反应性延迟转化为主动性延迟,并在一个大型的多中心部门中创建了一个检查表、流程驱动、减少差异的文化。

相似文献

1
Implementation of a "No Fly" safety culture in a multicenter radiation medicine department.在多中心放射医学部门实施“禁飞”安全文化。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jan-Mar;2(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
2
Six sigma tools for a patient safety-oriented, quality-checklist driven radiation medicine department.六西格玛工具在以患者安全为导向、以质量检查表为驱动的放射医学部门中的应用。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012 Apr-Jun;2(2):86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
3
Practical implementation of quality improvement for high-dose-rate brachytherapy.高剂量率近距离放射治疗质量改进的实际实施
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jan-Feb;6(1):34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
4
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
5
The impact of new technologies on radiation oncology events and trends in the past decade: an institutional experience.过去十年中新技术对放射肿瘤学事件和趋势的影响:机构经验。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Nov 15;84(4):925-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.042. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
6
Quality assurance needs for modern image-based radiotherapy: recommendations from 2007 interorganizational symposium on "quality assurance of radiation therapy: challenges of advanced technology".现代基于图像的放射治疗的质量保证需求:来自2007年“放射治疗质量保证:先进技术挑战”跨组织研讨会的建议
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71(1 Suppl):S2-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.080.
7
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
8
Evaluation of a mandatory quality assurance data capture in anesthesia: a secure electronic system to capture quality assurance information linked to an automated anesthesia record.评估麻醉中的强制性质量保证数据采集:一个安全的电子系统,用于采集与自动化麻醉记录相关的质量保证信息。
Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1218-25. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821207f0. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
9
A comprehensive quality assurance program for personnel and procedures in radiation oncology: value of voluntary error reporting and checklists.放射肿瘤学中人员和流程的全面质量保证计划:自愿错误报告和检查表的价值。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jun 1;86(2):241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
10
A model for increasing patient safety in the intensive care unit: increasing the implementation rates of proven safety measures.一种提高重症监护病房患者安全的模式:提高已证实的安全措施的实施率。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18(1):74-80. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024844.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing initial plan check efficacy using TG 275 failure modes and incident reporting.利用 TG 275 失效模式和事件报告评估初步方案检查的效果。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Jun;23(6):e13640. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13640. Epub 2022 May 10.
2
Posttraumatic Growth in Radiation Medicine During the COVID-19 Outbreak.COVID-19疫情期间放射医学领域的创伤后成长
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jul-Aug;7(4):100975. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100975. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
3
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge on Radiation Treatment: Report From a Multicenter New York Area Institution.
新冠疫情高峰对放射治疗的影响:来自纽约地区多中心机构的报告
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Sep;17(9):e1270-e1277. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00619. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
4
The Resilience of Radiation Oncology in the COVID Era and Beyond.放射肿瘤学在新冠疫情时代及之后的适应力
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Oct 1;108(2):364-369. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.065.
5
Development and execution of a pandemic preparedness plan: Therapeutic medical physics and radiation dosimetry during the COVID-19 crisis.制定和执行大流行防范计划:COVID-19 危机期间的治疗医学物理和辐射剂量学。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Sep;21(9):259-265. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12971. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
6
Guidelines to Reduce Hospitalization Rates for Patients Receiving Curative-Intent Radiation Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Report From a Multicenter New York Area Institution.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间降低接受根治性放疗患者住院率的指南:纽约地区多中心机构报告
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 May 11;5(4):621-627. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.04.021. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
7
Application of an incident taxonomy for radiation therapy: Analysis of five years of data from three integrated cancer centres.放射治疗事件分类法的应用:对三个综合癌症中心五年数据的分析
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018 May-Jun;23(3):220-227. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 May 10.
8
Making molehills out of a mountain: experience with a new scheduling strategy to diminish workload variations in response to increased treatment demands.小题大做:一种新的调度策略的经验,以应对治疗需求增加时减少工作量变化的情况。
Curr Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(4):e369-76. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3090. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
9
Incident Learning and Failure-Mode-and-Effects-Analysis Guided Safety Initiatives in Radiation Medicine.辐射医学中的事故学习和失效模式与效应分析指导的安全措施。
Front Oncol. 2013 Dec 16;3:305. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00305. eCollection 2013.
10
Development, implementation, and compliance of treatment pathways in radiation medicine.放射医学中治疗路径的制定、实施和遵从。
Front Oncol. 2013 May 6;3:105. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00105. eCollection 2013.