Suppr超能文献

使用 45°C 的水清洁家禽加工厂屠宰区的输送带。

Cleaning conveyor belts in the chicken-cutting area of a poultry processing plant with 45°c water.

机构信息

Sao Paulo State University, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Botucatu Campus, PO Box 572, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Federal University of Pampa, Uruguaiana Campus, Rodovia BR 472, Km 592, CEP 97.500-970, Uruguaiana, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 2014 Mar;77(3):496-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-340.

Abstract

Conveyor belts are widely used in food handling areas, especially in poultry processing plants. Because they are in direct contact with food and it is a requirement of the Brazilian health authority, conveyor belts are required to be continuously cleaned with hot water under pressure. The use of water in this procedure has been questioned based on the hypothesis that water may further disseminate microorganisms but not effectively reduce the organic material on the surface. Moreover, reducing the use of water in processing may contribute to a reduction in costs and emission of effluents. However, no consistent evidence in support of removing water during conveyor belt cleaning has been reported. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to compare the bacterial counts on conveyor belts that were or were not continuously cleaned with hot water under pressure. Superficial samples from conveyor belts (cleaned or not cleaned) were collected at three different times during operation (T1, after the preoperational cleaning [5 a.m.]; T2, after the first work shift [4 p.m.]; and T3, after the second work shift [1:30 a.m.]) in a poultry meat processing facility, and the samples were subjected to mesophilic and enterobacterial counts. For Enterobacteriaceae, no significant differences were observed between the conveyor belts, independent of the time of sampling or the cleaning process. No significant differences were observed between the counts of mesophilic bacteria at the distinct times of sampling on the conveyor belt that had not been subjected to continuous cleaning with water at 45°C. When comparing similar periods of sampling, no significant differences were observed between the mesophilic counts obtained from the conveyor belts that were or were not subjected to continuous cleaning with water at 45°C. Continuous cleaning with water did not significantly reduce microorganism counts, suggesting the possibility of discarding this procedure in chicken processing.

摘要

输送带广泛应用于食品处理区域,特别是在家禽加工厂。由于它们与食品直接接触,并且这是巴西卫生当局的要求,因此需要用热水在压力下对输送带进行持续清洁。由于基于水可能进一步传播微生物但不能有效减少表面有机物质的假设,对该过程中使用水提出了质疑。此外,减少加工过程中的用水量可能有助于降低成本和减少废水排放。然而,尚未有一致的证据支持在输送带清洁过程中去除水。因此,本研究的目的是比较经或未经热水在压力下连续清洁的输送带的细菌计数。在家禽肉类加工厂的操作过程中,在三个不同时间点(T1,在操作前清洁后[上午 5 点];T2,在第一个工作班次后[下午 4 点];T3,在第二个工作班次后[凌晨 1:30])从输送带(清洁或未清洁)收集表面样本,并对其进行需氧菌和肠杆菌计数。对于肠杆菌科,无论采样时间或清洁过程如何,输送带之间均未观察到计数存在显著差异。在未经过 45°C 的热水连续清洁的输送带上,在不同采样时间点的需氧菌计数之间未观察到显著差异。当比较相似的采样时间段时,在经过或未经 45°C 的热水连续清洁的输送带上获得的需氧菌计数之间未观察到显著差异。连续用水清洁并未显著降低微生物计数,这表明在鸡肉加工中可能需要摒弃该程序。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验