Waljee Jennifer F, Zhong Lin, Shauver Melissa J, Chung Kevin C
Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI.
Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI.
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 May;39(5):844-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.12.035. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
This study attempted to determine the extent to which surgeon age influences treatment patterns for distal radius fractures (DRFs). We hypothesized that younger surgeons perform open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for DRFs among elderly individuals more frequently than older surgeons, who employ a wider range of treatment modalities.
We identified 61,314 Medicare beneficiaries who experienced DRFs and the 12,823 surgeons who performed ORIF, external fixation, pinning, or closed reduction on them during 2007. We examined the effect of surgeon age on DRF treatment pattern, controlling for patient characteristics and other surgeon factors using multinomial logistic regression. We then stratified our analysis by American Society for Surgery of the Hand membership to more closely examine the influence of surgeon specialization on the association between surgeon age and DRF treatment.
Surgeons aged 40 years and younger were more likely to perform ORIF and less likely to choose external fixation and percutaneous pinning to treat DRFs, compared with older surgeons. Surgeon specialization mitigated this relationship, and American Society for Surgery of the Hand members were more likely to choose ORIF compared with nonmembers. However, surgeon age remained a significant predictor of treatment choice after controlling for other factors and surgeon specialization.
Younger surgeons are more likely to perform ORIF for DRFs among Medicare beneficiaries over 65 years of age. Given the lack of evidence supporting any single treatment option for DRF, understanding the factors that drive dissemination of operative techniques may provide insight into treatment disparities within the Medicare population.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.
本研究试图确定外科医生年龄对桡骨远端骨折(DRF)治疗模式的影响程度。我们假设,与采用更广泛治疗方式的年长外科医生相比,年轻外科医生对老年患者的桡骨远端骨折更常采用切开复位内固定术(ORIF)。
我们确定了61314名患有桡骨远端骨折的医疗保险受益人,以及2007年期间对他们实施切开复位内固定术、外固定术、穿针固定术或闭合复位术的12823名外科医生。我们使用多项逻辑回归分析,在控制患者特征和其他外科医生因素的情况下,研究外科医生年龄对桡骨远端骨折治疗模式的影响。然后,我们按美国手外科协会会员身份对分析进行分层,以更深入地研究外科医生专业对外科医生年龄与桡骨远端骨折治疗之间关联的影响。
与年长外科医生相比,40岁及以下的外科医生更倾向于实施切开复位内固定术,而选择外固定术和经皮穿针固定术治疗桡骨远端骨折的可能性较小。外科医生的专业缓解了这种关系,与非会员相比,美国手外科协会会员更倾向于选择切开复位内固定术。然而,在控制了其他因素和外科医生专业后,外科医生年龄仍然是治疗选择的重要预测因素。
年轻外科医生对65岁以上医疗保险受益人的桡骨远端骨折更倾向于实施切开复位内固定术。鉴于缺乏支持桡骨远端骨折单一治疗方案的证据,了解推动手术技术传播的因素可能有助于洞察医疗保险人群中的治疗差异。
研究类型/证据水平:治疗性III级。