Suppr超能文献

如何解读胆道感染患者的胆汁培养结果。

How to interpret the bile culture results of patients with biliary tract infections.

作者信息

Park Ji Won, Lee Jong Kyun, Lee Kyu Taek, Lee Kwang Hyuk, Sung Young Kyung, Kang Cheol-In

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;38(3):300-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/GOALS: Bile is normally sterile, but the presence of organisms in the bile does not necessarily imply an active infection. We wonder what the significance of bile culture results on antibiotics choice in cholangitis with negative blood culture. The aim of this study was to compare organisms cultured from bile with those from blood in bacteremic biliary tract infection and to evaluate factors associated with concordance between blood and bile isolates.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2010, 266 positive blood cultures with concomitant bile culture in bacteremic biliary tract infection were identified. Follow-up bile specimens obtained after negative conversion of blood culture and clinical recovery from acute infection were collected for supplementary analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 266 events, 258 showed positive bile culture. Of the 258 bile samples, 80 yielded the same organisms with blood, 129 showed partial agreement and 49 yielded completely different organisms with blood. Only the number of organism was found to be independently associated with concordance. Of the 529 organisms isolated from bile, 227 were found in blood and gram-negative organisms showed higher rate of coincidence than gram-positive organisms. Of the 84 follow-up bile sample, 94% showed persistent positive culture and higher rate of antibiotics resistance than initial bile culture.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of the organisms isolated from bile, especially gram-positive organisms, are not likely to be true pathogens. But single organism cultured from bile has clinical significance. Routine follow-up bile culture in patients showing clinical improvement is not necessary.

摘要

背景/目的:胆汁通常是无菌的,但胆汁中存在微生物并不一定意味着存在活动性感染。我们想知道在血培养阴性的胆管炎中,胆汁培养结果对抗生素选择的意义。本研究的目的是比较菌血症性胆道感染中胆汁培养出的微生物与血培养出的微生物,并评估与血培养和胆汁培养分离菌一致性相关的因素。

方法

在2000年至2010年期间,共识别出266例菌血症性胆道感染且同时进行了胆汁培养的血培养阳性病例。收集血培养转阴且急性感染临床恢复后获得的后续胆汁标本进行补充分析。

结果

在这266例病例中,258例胆汁培养呈阳性。在这258份胆汁样本中,80份培养出的微生物与血培养相同,129份部分一致,49份培养出的微生物与血培养完全不同。仅发现微生物数量与一致性独立相关。从胆汁中分离出的529种微生物中,227种也在血液中被发现,革兰氏阴性菌的一致率高于革兰氏阳性菌。在84份后续胆汁样本中,94%培养持续呈阳性,且抗生素耐药率高于初始胆汁培养。

结论

从胆汁中分离出的微生物中,超过一半,尤其是革兰氏阳性菌,不太可能是真正的病原体。但从胆汁中培养出单一微生物具有临床意义。对于临床症状改善的患者,常规进行后续胆汁培养没有必要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验