Dabbah S, Komarov H, Marmor A, Assy N
Department of Cardiology, Ziv Medical Center and Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
Department of Cardiology, Ziv Medical Center and Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Aug;24(8):877-82. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.01.019. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
Epicardial and pericardial fat are separate fat depots surrounding the heart. Previous studies found epicardial fat to be associated with diastolic dysfunction, but they had some limitations. Pericardial fat association with diastolic dysfunction was not examined. Our aim was to assess the relation of epicardial and pericardial fat with diastolic filling.
In 73 volunteers without known heart disease or complaints, using echocardiography, we measured epicardial and pericardial fat thickness from long(LAX) and short(SAX) axis views and assessed diastolic filling: mitral inflow (E/A ratio, E wave deceleration time[DT]), pulmonary vein flow (systolic/diastolic ratio [S/D], systolic filling fraction[SFR], late retrograde velocity[Ar]), color M-mode flow propagation velocity [Vp], and tissue Doppler derived mitral early annular velocities at the septum [e' sep] and lateral wall [e'-lat]. By Spearman's correlation, epicardial fat from LAX had a weak, but statistically significant correlations with several diastolic filling indices (SFR{rs = 0.29, P = 0.02}, Ar{rs = 0.3, P = 0.01}, Vp{rs = -0.3, P = 0.01}, e' sep{rs = -0.23, P = 0.04}, e' lat{rs = -0.26, P = 0.03}). In multivariate logistic regression model adjusting for age, gender, diabetes, systolic blood pressure and left ventricle mass index, epicardial fat thickness from LAX (and not from SAX) was the only independent predictor of e' [e' sep < 8: OR = 1.8, 95%CI = 1.1-2.9; e' lat<10: OR = 1.6, 95%CI = 1.01-2.6]. After adjustment, Pericardial fat measured from LAX was independent predictor of e' lat only[e' lat < 10:OR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.03-1.6).
Epicardial fat measured from LAX is an independent predictor of myocardial relaxation. Pericardial fat independent association with diastolic filling is uncertain.
心外膜脂肪和心包脂肪是围绕心脏的不同脂肪库。既往研究发现心外膜脂肪与舒张功能障碍有关,但存在一些局限性。心包脂肪与舒张功能障碍的关系未得到研究。我们的目的是评估心外膜脂肪和心包脂肪与舒张期充盈的关系。
在73名无已知心脏病或不适症状的志愿者中,我们使用超声心动图从长轴(LAX)和短轴(SAX)视图测量心外膜和心包脂肪厚度,并评估舒张期充盈:二尖瓣血流(E/A比值、E波减速时间[DT])、肺静脉血流(收缩期/舒张期比值[S/D]、收缩期充盈分数[SFR]、晚期逆向速度[Ar])、彩色M型血流传播速度[Vp]以及组织多普勒测量的二尖瓣在室间隔[e' sep]和侧壁[e'-lat]的早期环向速度。通过Spearman相关性分析,LAX视图的心外膜脂肪与多个舒张期充盈指标存在微弱但具有统计学意义的相关性(SFR{rs = 0.29,P = 0.02},Ar{rs = 0.3,P = 0.01},Vp{rs = -0.3,P = 0.01},e' sep{rs = -0.23,P = 0.04},e' lat{rs = -0.26,P = 0.03})。在调整年龄、性别、糖尿病、收缩压和左心室质量指数的多因素逻辑回归模型中,LAX视图的心外膜脂肪厚度(而非SAX视图)是e'的唯一独立预测因素[e' sep < 8:OR = 1.8,95%CI = 1.1 - 2.9;e' lat<10:OR = 1.6,95%CI = 1.01 - 2.6]。调整后,LAX视图测量的心包脂肪仅是e' lat的独立预测因素[e' lat < 10:OR = 1.3,95%CI 1.03 - 1.6]。
LAX视图测量的心外膜脂肪是心肌松弛的独立预测因素。心包脂肪与舒张期充盈的独立关系尚不确定。