Rayner M D, Starkus J G
Department of Physiology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu 96822.
Biophys J. 1989 Jan;55(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82775-4.
Progressive shifts of holding potential (Vh) in crayfish giant axons, from -140 to -70 mV, reduce gating currents seen in depolarizing steps (to 0 mV test potential) while proportionately increasing gating currents in hyperpolarizing steps (to -240 mV). The resulting sigmoid equilibrium charge distribution (Q-Vh curve) shows an effective valence of 1.9e and a midpoint of -100 mV. By contrast, Q-V curves obtained using hyperpolarizing and/or depolarizing steps from a single holding potential, change their "shape" depending on the chosen holding potential. For holding potentials at the negative end of the Q-Vh distribution (e.g., -140 mV), negligible charge moves in hyperpolarizing pulses and the Q-V curve can be characterized entirely from depolarizing voltage steps. The slope of the resulting simple sigmoid Q-V curve also indicates an effective valence of 1.9e. When the axon is held at less negative potentials significant charge moves in hyperpolarizing voltage steps. The component of the Q-V curve collected using hyperpolarizing pulses shows a significantly reduced slope (approximately 0.75e) by comparison with the 1.9e slope found using depolarizing pulses or from the Q-Vh curve. As holding potential is shifted in the depolarizing direction along the Q-Vh curve, an increasing fraction of total charge movement must be assessed in hyperpolarizing voltage steps. Thus charge moving in the low slope component of the Q-V curve increases as holding potential is depolarized, while charge moving with high apparent valence decreases proportionately. Additional results, together with simulations based on a simple kinetic model, suggest that the reduced apparent valence of the low slope component of the Q-V curve results from gating charge immobilization occurring at holding potential. Immobilization selectively retards that fraction of total charge moving in hyperpolarizing pulses. Misleading conclusions, as to the number and valence of the gating particles, may therefore be derived from Q-V curves obtained by other than depolarizing pulses from negative saturated holding potentials.
小龙虾巨轴突中保持电位(Vh)从-140 mV逐步向-70 mV转变时,去极化步骤(至0 mV测试电位)中观察到的门控电流会减少,而超极化步骤(至-240 mV)中的门控电流会相应增加。由此产生的S形平衡电荷分布(Q-Vh曲线)显示有效价为1.9e,中点为-100 mV。相比之下,从单个保持电位使用超极化和/或去极化步骤获得的Q-V曲线,其“形状”会根据所选的保持电位而改变。对于Q-Vh分布负端的保持电位(例如,-140 mV),超极化脉冲中可忽略不计的电荷移动,并且Q-V曲线可以完全由去极化电压步骤来表征。所得简单S形Q-V曲线的斜率也表明有效价为1.9e。当轴突保持在负性较小的电位时,超极化电压步骤中会有大量电荷移动。与使用去极化脉冲或从Q-Vh曲线获得的1.9e斜率相比,使用超极化脉冲收集的Q-V曲线分量显示斜率显著降低(约为0.75e)。随着保持电位沿Q-Vh曲线向去极化方向移动,总电荷移动中越来越大的部分必须通过超极化电压步骤来评估。因此,随着保持电位去极化,在Q-V曲线低斜率分量中移动的电荷增加,而以高表观价移动的电荷相应减少。其他结果以及基于简单动力学模型的模拟表明,Q-V曲线低斜率分量表观价降低是由于在保持电位处发生门控电荷固定化所致。固定化选择性地延迟了在超极化脉冲中移动的总电荷的那一部分。因此,关于门控粒子的数量和价的误导性结论可能源于除了从负饱和保持电位进行去极化脉冲获得的Q-V曲线。