• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科住院疾病国家指南的方法学质量。

Methodological quality of national guidelines for pediatric inpatient conditions.

作者信息

Hester Gabrielle, Nelson Katherine, Mahant Sanjay, Eresuma Emily, Keren Ron, Srivastava Rajendu

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2014 Jun;9(6):384-90. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2187. Epub 2014 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1002/jhm.2187
PMID:24677729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4043870/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines help inform standardization of care for quality improvement (QI). The Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings network published a prioritization list of inpatient conditions with high prevalence, cost, and variation in resource utilization across children's hospitals. The methodological quality of guidelines for priority conditions is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To rate the methodological quality of national guidelines for 20 priority pediatric inpatient conditions.

DESIGN

We searched sources including PubMed for national guidelines published from 2002 to 2012. Guidelines specific to 1 organism, test or treatment, or institution were excluded. Guidelines were rated by 2 raters using a validated tool (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) with an overall rating on a 7-point scale (7 = the highest). Inter-rater reliability was measured with a weighted kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

Seventeen guidelines met inclusion criteria for 13 conditions; 7 conditions yielded no relevant national guidelines. The highest methodological-quality guidelines were for asthma, tonsillectomy, and bronchiolitis (mean overall rating 7, 6.5, and 6.5, respectively); the lowest were for sickle cell disease (2 guidelines) and dental caries (mean overall rating 4, 3.5, and 3, respectively). The overall weighted kappa was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.78-0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a group of moderate to high methodological-quality national guidelines for priority pediatric inpatient conditions. Hospitals should consider these guidelines to inform QI initiatives.

摘要

背景

指南有助于为质量改进(QI)的护理标准化提供信息。住院儿童研究网络发布了一份住院疾病优先级列表,这些疾病在儿童医院中具有高患病率、高成本且资源利用存在差异。优先级疾病指南的方法学质量尚不清楚。

目的

对20种优先儿科住院疾病的国家指南的方法学质量进行评分。

设计

我们检索了包括PubMed在内的来源,以查找2002年至2012年发布的国家指南。排除特定于1种生物体、测试或治疗或机构的指南。由2名评分者使用经过验证的工具(研究与评估指南评估)对指南进行评分,总体评分采用7分制(7分 = 最高)。使用加权kappa系数测量评分者间的可靠性。

结果

17项指南符合13种疾病的纳入标准;7种疾病未产生相关的国家指南。方法学质量最高的指南是关于哮喘、扁桃体切除术和细支气管炎(总体平均评分分别为7分、6.5分和6.5分);最低的是镰状细胞病(2项指南)和龋齿(总体平均评分分别为4分、3.5分和3分)。总体加权kappa为0.83(95%置信区间0.78 - 0.87)。

结论

我们确定了一组针对优先儿科住院疾病的方法学质量中等至高的国家指南。医院应考虑这些指南以指导质量改进举措。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/4043870/33d8043f6351/nihms573189f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/4043870/33d8043f6351/nihms573189f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ec8/4043870/33d8043f6351/nihms573189f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Methodological quality of national guidelines for pediatric inpatient conditions.儿科住院疾病国家指南的方法学质量。
J Hosp Med. 2014 Jun;9(6):384-90. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2187. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
2
Quality improvement research in pediatric hospital medicine and the role of the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings (PRIS) network.儿科医院医学中的质量改进研究以及住院患者环境下儿科研究(PRIS)网络的作用。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.006.
3
Novel Approach to Emergency Departments' Pediatric Readiness Across a Health System.医疗体系中急诊科儿科准备工作的新方法
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Jun;36(6):274-276. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001385.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Hospital-level compliance with asthma care quality measures at children's hospitals and subsequent asthma-related outcomes.儿童医院的哮喘护理质量措施的医院级别依从性与随后的哮喘相关结局。
JAMA. 2011 Oct 5;306(13):1454-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1385.
7
[Choosing wisely in pediatric hospital medicine: five opportunities for improved healthcare value].[儿科医院医学中的明智选择:提升医疗保健价值的五个机遇]
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2014 Jun;112(3):e120-1.
8
A Review of Best Practices for Monitoring and Improving Inpatient Pediatric Patient Experiences.《监测和改善住院儿科患者体验的最佳实践综述》
Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Mar;10(3):277-285. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2019-0243. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
9
Choosing wisely in pediatric hospital medicine: five opportunities for improved healthcare value.明智选择儿科医院医疗:提高医疗保健价值的五个机会。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Sep;8(9):479-85. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2064. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
10
Variation in Family Experience of Pediatric Inpatient Care As Measured by Child HCAHPS.通过儿童医疗保健消费者评估调查(Child HCAHPS)衡量的儿科住院护理家庭体验差异。
Pediatrics. 2017 Apr;139(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3372. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of reporting and evidence in American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines.美国儿科学会指南中的报告和证据质量。
Pediatrics. 2013 Apr;131(4):732-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2027. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
2
How to decide whether a clinical practice guideline is trustworthy.如何判断临床实践指南是否可信。
JAMA. 2013 Jan 9;309(2):139-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.156703.
3
Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual, Third Edition: a quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action.临床实践指南制定手册,第三版:一种将证据转化为行动的质量驱动方法。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jan;148(1 Suppl):S1-55. doi: 10.1177/0194599812467004.
4
Development of the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings (PRIS) Network: lessons learned.
J Hosp Med. 2012 Oct;7(8):661-4. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1972.
5
Prioritization of comparative effectiveness research topics in hospital pediatrics.医院儿科比较效果研究主题的优先排序
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Dec;166(12):1155-64. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1266.
6
Male circumcision.男性割礼。
Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):e756-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1990. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
7
The Joint Commission Children's Asthma Care quality measures and asthma readmissions.联合委员会儿童哮喘护理质量措施和哮喘再入院。
Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):482-91. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3318. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
8
Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus.癫痫持续状态的评估和管理指南。
Neurocrit Care. 2012 Aug;17(1):3-23. doi: 10.1007/s12028-012-9695-z.
9
Effectiveness of antimicrobial guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia in children.抗菌指南对儿童社区获得性肺炎的疗效。
Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):e1326-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2412. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
10
The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America.儿童社区获得性肺炎管理:儿童传染病学会和美国传染病学会临床实践指南(适用于 3 个月以上的婴儿和儿童)。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;53(7):e25-76. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir531. Epub 2011 Aug 31.