Departments of Urology, University Hospital "Carl Gustav Carus", Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany.
BMC Urol. 2014 Mar 29;14:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-28.
In patients with early prostate cancer, stratification by comorbidity could be of importance in clinical decision making as well as in characterizing patients enrolled into clinical trials. In this study, we investigated several comorbidity classifications as predictors of overall mortality after radical prostatectomy, searching for measures providing complementary prognostic information which could be combined into a single score.
The study sample consisted of 2205 consecutive patients selected for radical prostatectomy with a mean age of 64 years and a mean follow-up of 9.2 years (median: 8.6). Seventy-four patients with incomplete tumor-related data were excluded. In addition to age and tumor-related parameters, six comorbidity classifications and the body mass index were assessed as possible predictors of overall mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves and Mantel-Haenszel hazard ratios were used for univariate analysis. The impact of different causes of death was analyzed by competing risk analysis. Cox proportional hazard models were calculated to analyze combined effects of variables.
Age, Gleason score, tumor stage, Charlson score, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class and body mass index were identified a significant predictors of overall mortality in the multivariate analysis regardless whether two-sided and three-sided stratifications were used. Competing risk analysis revealed that the excess mortality in patients with a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher was attributable to competing mortality including second cancers, but not to prostate cancer mortality.
Stratifying patients by a combined consideration of the comorbidity measures Charlson score, ASA classification and body mass index may assist clinical decision making in elderly candidates for radical prostatectomy.
在早期前列腺癌患者中,根据合并症进行分层对于临床决策以及描述入组临床试验的患者都很重要。在这项研究中,我们研究了几种合并症分类作为根治性前列腺切除术后总死亡率的预测因素,寻找能提供互补预后信息的指标,将其组合成一个单一的评分。
研究样本由 2205 例连续选择接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者组成,平均年龄为 64 岁,平均随访时间为 9.2 年(中位数:8.6 年)。排除了 74 例肿瘤相关数据不完整的患者。除了年龄和肿瘤相关参数外,还评估了 6 种合并症分类和体重指数作为总死亡率的可能预测因素。Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Mantel-Haenszel 风险比用于单变量分析。通过竞争风险分析分析不同死亡原因的影响。计算 Cox 比例风险模型以分析变量的综合效应。
在多变量分析中,年龄、Gleason 评分、肿瘤分期、Charlson 评分、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况分类和体重指数被确定为总死亡率的显著预测因素,无论使用双侧和三边分层。竞争风险分析显示,体重指数为 30 kg/m2 或更高的患者的超额死亡率归因于包括第二癌症在内的竞争死亡,但与前列腺癌死亡率无关。
综合考虑合并症指标 Charlson 评分、ASA 分类和体重指数对患者进行分层可能有助于老年根治性前列腺切除术候选者的临床决策。